Equivalence of paper-and-pencil and computerized self-report surveys in older adults

被引：14

作者：

Weigold, Arne ^{[1
]}

Weigold, Ingrid K. ^{[2
]}

Drakeford, Naomi M. ^{[2
]}

Dykema, Stephanie A. ^{[2
]}

Smith, Charity A. ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Notre Dame Coll, Dept Psychol, South Euclid, OH 44121 USA

[2] Univ Akron, Sch Counseling, Akron, OH 44325 USA

来源：

COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR | 2016年 / 54卷

关键词：

Older adult; Computer; Quantitative equivalence; Qualitative equivalence; Auxiliary equivalence; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY SCALE; CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS; AGE-DIFFERENCES; EFFICACY SCALE; SHORT FORMS; INTERNET; PERSONALITY; TECHNOLOGY; PEOPLE; ONLINE;

D O I：

10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.033

中图分类号：

B84 [心理学];

学科分类号：

04 ; 0402 ;

摘要：

Research is lacking on the equivalence of paper-and-pencil and computer-administered surveys in older adult samples. In addition, few comparability studies have used best practices for examining equivalence. The current study investigated quantitative (means), qualitative (internal consistency and intercorrelations), and auxiliary (missing items, completion time, and comfort) equivalence for completing self-report surveys in paper-and-pencil or computerized conditions in an older adult sample. One hundred and eight older adults ages 60 and over were randomly assigned to a paper-and-pencil or computer condition and completed questionnaires assessing personality, social desirability, and computer self-efficacy. Results generally showed qualitative equivalence, with some notable differences for quantitative and auxiliary equivalence. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：407 / 413

页数：7

共 50 条

[1] Mean scores for self-report surveys completed using paper-and-pencil and computers: A meta-analytic test of equivalence
Weigold, Arne
Weigold, Ingrid K.
Natera, Sara N.
[J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2018, 86 : 153 - 164
[2] Computer-assisted versus paper-and-pencil self-report delinquency surveys: Results of an experimental study
Baier, Dirk
[J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGY, 2018, 15 (04) : 385 - 402
[3] Examination of the Equivalence of Self-Report Survey-Based Paper-and-Pencil and Internet Data Collection Methods
Weigold, Arne
Weigold, Ingrid K.
Russell, Elizabeth J.
[J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2013, 18 (01) : 53 - 70
[4] The equivalence and the predictive validity of the paper-and-pencil and computerized adaptive formats
Alkhadher, OH
Anderson, N
Clarke, D
[J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 31 (3-4) : 3163 - 3163
[5] Computerized Device Equivalence: A Comparison of Surveys Completed Using A Smartphone, Tablet, Desktop Computer, and Paper-and-Pencil
Weigold, Arne
Weigold, Ingrid K.
Dykema, Stephanie A.
Drakeford, Naomi M.
Martin-Wagar, Caitlin A.
[J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 2021, 37 (08) : 803 - 814
[6] EQUIVALENCE OF COMPUTERIZED AND PAPER-AND-PENCIL COGNITIVE-ABILITY TESTS - A METAANALYSIS
MEAD, AD
DRASGOW, F
[J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1993, 114 (03) : 449 - 458
[7] The score equivalence of paper-and-pencil and computerized versions of a speeded test of reading comprehension
Pomplun, M
Frey, S
Becker, DF
[J]. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2002, 62 (02) : 337 - 354
[8] The equivalence of computerized and paper-and-pencil psychological instruments: Implications for measures of negative affect
Schulenberg, SE
Yutrzenka, BA
[J]. BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS INSTRUMENTS & COMPUTERS, 1999, 31 (02): : 315 - 321
[9] Testing for measurement equivalence of human values across online and paper-and-pencil surveys
Eldad Davidov
Felix Depner
[J]. Quality & Quantity, 2011, 45 : 375 - 390
[10] Testing for measurement equivalence of human values across online and paper-and-pencil surveys
Davidov, Eldad
Depner, Felix
[J]. QUALITY & QUANTITY, 2011, 45 (02) : 375 - 390

← 1 2 3 4 5 →