Testing for measurement equivalence of human values across online and paper-and-pencil surveys

被引:0
|
作者
Eldad Davidov
Felix Depner
机构
[1] University of Cologne,Research Institute for Sociology
[2] University of Zurich,Institute of Sociology
[3] University of Mannheim,undefined
来源
Quality & Quantity | 2011年 / 45卷
关键词
Online survey; Paper-and-pencil survey; Measurement invariance; Multiple group confirmatory factor analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The following study investigates the measurement equivalence of an online and paper-and-pencil (PAP) survey of human values. For this purpose, a total of 250 respondents completed the 21-item version of the Portrait Value Questionnaire either online (n = 125) or by PAP (n = 125). This questionnaire was developed by Schwartz (Advances in experimental social psychology, Academic Press, New York, 1992) and has been included in the European Social Survey since 2002 to test his theory of basic human values. Measurement invariance was tested via a multiple group confirmatory factor analysis. The assessment of invariance included the three levels of configural, metric, and scalar invariance, and the latent means of the values between both samples were compared. Results of this study show that the measurements are invariant at the three levels (configural, metric, and scalar), but there are latent mean differences between the values across the surveys. These differences may be partly explained by age and level of education differences between the two samples. Based on these findings we conclude that the methods of measurement are essentially invariant.
引用
收藏
页码:375 / 390
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Testing for measurement equivalence of human values across online and paper-and-pencil surveys
    Davidov, Eldad
    Depner, Felix
    [J]. QUALITY & QUANTITY, 2011, 45 (02) : 375 - 390
  • [2] testing for measurement invariance by detecting local misspecification and an illustration across online and paper-and-pencil samples
    Cieciuch, Jan
    Davidov, Eldad
    Oberski, Daniel I.
    Algesheimer, Rene
    [J]. EUROPEAN POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2015, 14 (04) : 521 - 538
  • [3] testing for measurement invariance by detecting local misspecification and an illustration across online and paper-and-pencil samples
    jan cieciuch
    eldad davidov
    daniel l oberski
    rené algesheimer
    [J]. European Political Science, 2015, 14 : 521 - 538
  • [4] PCs or paper-and-pencil: Online surveys for data collection
    Wharton, CM
    Hampl, JS
    Hall, R
    Winham, DM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DIETETIC ASSOCIATION, 2003, 103 (11) : 1458 - +
  • [5] Measurement Equivalence of Paper-and-Pencil and Internet Organisational Surveys: A Large Scale Examination in 16 Countries
    De Beuckelaer, Alain
    Lievens, Filip
    [J]. APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW-PSYCHOLOGIE APPLIQUEE-REVUE INTERNATIONALE, 2009, 58 (02): : 336 - 361
  • [6] Insuring sample equivalence across internet and paper-and-pencil assessments
    Epstein, J
    Klinkenberg, WD
    Wiley, D
    McKinley, L
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2001, 17 (03) : 339 - 346
  • [7] Equivalence of unproctored internet testing and proctored paper-and-pencil testing of the Big Five
    Le Corff, Yann
    Gingras, Veronique
    Busque-Carrier, Mathieu
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT, 2017, 25 (02) : 154 - 160
  • [8] Equivalence of paper-and-pencil and computerized self-report surveys in older adults
    Weigold, Arne
    Weigold, Ingrid K.
    Drakeford, Naomi M.
    Dykema, Stephanie A.
    Smith, Charity A.
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2016, 54 : 407 - 413
  • [9] Response Rates for Surveys Completed With Paper-and-Pencil and Computers: Using Meta-Analysis to Assess Equivalence
    Weigold, Arne
    Weigold, Ingrid K.
    Natera, Sara N.
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW, 2019, 37 (05) : 649 - 668
  • [10] Equivalence of Paper-and-Pencil and Online Administration Modes of the Statewide English Test for Students With and Without Disabilities
    Kim, Do-Hong
    Huynh, Huynh
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT, 2010, 15 (02) : 107 - 121