Equivalence of paper-and-pencil and computerized self-report surveys in older adults

被引：14

作者：

Weigold, Arne ^{[1
]}

Weigold, Ingrid K. ^{[2
]}

Drakeford, Naomi M. ^{[2
]}

Dykema, Stephanie A. ^{[2
]}

Smith, Charity A. ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Notre Dame Coll, Dept Psychol, South Euclid, OH 44121 USA

[2] Univ Akron, Sch Counseling, Akron, OH 44325 USA

来源：

COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR | 2016年 / 54卷

关键词：

Older adult; Computer; Quantitative equivalence; Qualitative equivalence; Auxiliary equivalence; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY SCALE; CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS; AGE-DIFFERENCES; EFFICACY SCALE; SHORT FORMS; INTERNET; PERSONALITY; TECHNOLOGY; PEOPLE; ONLINE;

D O I：

10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.033

中图分类号：

B84 [心理学];

学科分类号：

04 ; 0402 ;

摘要：

Research is lacking on the equivalence of paper-and-pencil and computer-administered surveys in older adult samples. In addition, few comparability studies have used best practices for examining equivalence. The current study investigated quantitative (means), qualitative (internal consistency and intercorrelations), and auxiliary (missing items, completion time, and comfort) equivalence for completing self-report surveys in paper-and-pencil or computerized conditions in an older adult sample. One hundred and eight older adults ages 60 and over were randomly assigned to a paper-and-pencil or computer condition and completed questionnaires assessing personality, social desirability, and computer self-efficacy. Results generally showed qualitative equivalence, with some notable differences for quantitative and auxiliary equivalence. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：407 / 413

页数：7

共 50 条

[31] Computerized versus paper-and-pencil assessment of self-concept: Score comparability and respondent preferences
Vispoel, WP
[J]. MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION IN COUNSELING AND DEVELOPMENT, 2000, 33 (03) : 130 - 143
[32] Equivalence of the paper-and-pencil and the computerised administration of the WB-Q and the DTSQ
Pouwer, F
Snoek, FJ
Heine, RJ
vanderPloeg, HM
[J]. DIABETOLOGIA, 1997, 40 : 2493 - 2493
[33] Comparison of paper-and-pencil vs. computerized administration of the Leistungsprufsystem (LPS)
Troche, S
Rammstedt, B
Rammsayer, T
[J]. DIAGNOSTICA, 2002, 48 (03): : 115 - 120
[34] Computer-administered versus paper-and-pencil mental health surveys
Eisen, SV
Toche-Manley, LL
Grissom, GR
[J]. PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2004, 55 (11) : 1316 - 1317
[35] PAPER-AND-PENCIL VERSUS PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANT ENABLED SURVEYS: A COMPARISON
Kochan, B.
Bellemans, T.
Janssens, D.
Wets, G.
Timmermans, H. J. P.
[J]. TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS: ENGINEERING & MANAGEMENT, 2007, : 565 - 574
[36] THE EFFECTS OF COMPUTERIZED VERSUS PAPER-AND-PENCIL ADMINISTRATION ON MEASURES OF NEGATIVE AFFECT
GEORGE, CE
LANKFORD, JS
WILSON, SE
[J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 1992, 8 (2-3) : 203 - 209
[37] Comparison of Performance-Based Observed Assessment, Self-Report, and Paper–Pencil Measures of Everyday Problem Solving in Chinese Older Adults
Bo Chen
Yifan Huang
Dahua Wang
Wengen Deng
[J]. Journal of Adult Development, 2019, 26 : 129 - 138
[38] Middle-aged and older Black adults' experiences completing a traditional paper-and-pencil cognitive battery and two contemporary computerized cognitive batteries
Dobbs, Debra
Sadeq, Nasreen A.
Peterson, Lindsay
Sardina, Angela
Tan, Shyuan Ching
Brown-Hughes, Travonia
Andel, Ross
Gamaldo, Alyssa
[J]. AGING NEUROPSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITION, 2021, 28 (04) : 600 - 615
[39] Equivalence of unproctored internet testing and proctored paper-and-pencil testing of the Big Five
Le Corff, Yann
Gingras, Veronique
Busque-Carrier, Mathieu
[J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT, 2017, 25 (02) : 154 - 160
[40] The quick development of equivalence classes in a paper-and-pencil format through written instructions
Svein Eikeseth
Jesus Rosales-Ruiz
Angela Duarte
Donald M. Baer
[J]. The Psychological Record, 1997, 47 : 275 - 284

← 1 2 3 4 5 →