Comparative Analysis of the Chemical Composition and Microstructure Conformation Between Different Dental Implant Bone Drills

被引:5
|
作者
Marenzi, Gaetano [1 ]
Sammartino, Jose Camilla [2 ]
Scherillo, Fabio [3 ]
Rengo, Carlo [4 ]
De Rosa, Alfredo [5 ]
Graziano, Vincenzo [6 ]
Spagnuolo, Gianrico [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Neurosci Reprod & Odontostomatol Sci, Via Pansini 5, I-80131 Naples, Italy
[2] Univ Pavia, Dept Biol & Biotechnol Lazzaro Spallanzani, Via Ferrata 9, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
[3] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Chem Mat & Ind Prod Engn, Piazzale Tecchio 80, I-80125 Naples, Italy
[4] Univ Siena, Sch Dent Med, Dept Prosthodont & Dent Mat, I-53100 Siena, Italy
[5] Univ Campania L Vanvitelli, Dept Odontol & Surg, Via S Andrea Dame 6, I-80138 Naples, Italy
[6] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Adv Biomed Sci, Via Pansini 5, I-80131 Naples, Italy
[7] IM Sechenov First Moscow State Med Univ, Inst Dent, Moscow 119146, Russia
关键词
dental implant drill; microstructural surface analysis; bone drill chemical composition; drill hardness; HEAT-GENERATION; IN-VITRO; SITE PREPARATION; STAINLESS-STEEL; OSTEOTOMY; WEAR; TEMPERATURE; DEFORMATION; IRRIGATION; ROUGHNESS;
D O I
10.3390/ma12111866
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Background: Hardness is considered an important parameter for evaluating the clinical performance of dental implant bone drills. It is connected to the chemical composition, microstructure conformation and manufacture of the surgical drills. Methods: Microstructure of five dental implant drills using scanning electronic microscopy (SEM) integrated with energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry. Vickers microhardness was measured using a CV 2000 microhardness tester with an indentation force of 500 g. Results: Composition of the implant drills was typical of martensitic stainless steel (MSS). The drills contained 13%-17% of Cr; Mo, Si and Mn were present as minor ligands. The examined bone drills showed different external surface conformation and hardness in relation to the different industrial production processes. A rougher external surface and a higher hardness value are characteristics of the surgical bone drills produced by hot forming; the implant drills produced by machining showed mailing lines on their external surface and a lower hardness. Conclusions: Different compositions and treatments were used by the manufacturers to improve the hardness of the external layer of the dental implant drills making them prone to a diverse heat generation during the implant site preparation.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical Influence of Micromorphological Structure of Dental Implant Bone Drills
    Marenzi, Gaetano
    Sammartino, Jose Camilla
    Quaremba, Giuseppe
    Graziano, Vincenzo
    El Hassanin, Andrea
    Qorri, Med Erda
    Sammartino, Gilberto
    Iorio-Siciliano, Vincenzo
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 2018
  • [2] Assessment of the Chemical Composition in Different Dental Implant Types: An Analysis through EDX System
    Jose Dias, Fernando
    Fuentes, Ramon
    Navarro, Pablo
    Weber, Benjamin
    Borie, Eduardo
    COATINGS, 2020, 10 (09)
  • [3] Comparative Analysis of Cutting Efficiency and Surface Maintenance Between Different Types of Implant Drills: An In Vitro Study
    Hochscheidt, Celso Joao
    Shimizu, Roberto Hideo
    Andrighetto, Augusto Ricardo
    Pierezan, Rodrigo
    Thome, Geninho
    Salatti, Rafael
    IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2017, 26 (05) : 723 - 729
  • [4] Cell Behavior Related to Implant Surfaces with Different Microstructure and Chemical Composition: An In Vitro Analysis
    Conserva, Enrico
    Lanuti, Anna
    Menini, Maria
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2010, 25 (06) : 1099 - 1107
  • [5] Correlation between radiographic analysis of alveolar bone density around dental implant and resonance frequency of dental implant
    Prawoko, S. S.
    Nelwan, L. C.
    Odang, R. W.
    Kusdhany, L. S.
    1ST PHYSICS AND TECHNOLOGIES IN MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY SYMPOSIUM, 2017, 884
  • [6] Comparison of the Bone Harvesting Capacity of an Intraoral Bone Harvesting Device and Three Different Implant Drills
    Lim, Hyun-Chang
    Ha, Kyung-In
    Hong, Ji-Youn
    Han, Ji-Young
    Shin, Seung-Il
    Shin, Seung-Yun
    Herr, Yeek
    Chung, Jong-Hyuk
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 2017
  • [7] Primary Implant Stability Analysis of Different Dental Implant Connections and Designs-An In Vitro Comparative Study
    Raz, Perry
    Meir, Haya
    Levartovsky, Shifra
    Sebaoun, Alon
    Beitlitum, Ilan
    MATERIALS, 2022, 15 (09)
  • [8] Thermal Variation During Osteotomy With Different Dental Implant Drills: A Standardized Study in Bovine Ribs
    Hochscheidt, Celso Joao
    Shimizu, Roberto Hideo
    Andrighetto, Augusto Ricardo
    Moura, Luis Mauro
    Golin, Alexsander Luiz
    Hochscheidt, Regina Celia
    IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2017, 26 (01) : 73 - 79
  • [9] THE EVALUATION OF THE INTERFACE BETWEEN BONE AND A BIOCERAMIC DENTAL IMPLANT
    GATTI, AM
    ZAFFE, D
    POLI, GP
    GALETTI, R
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH, 1987, 21 (08): : 1005 - 1011
  • [10] Chemical Evaluation of Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy Analysis of Different Failing Dental Implant Surfaces: A Comparative Clinical Trial
    Guler, Berceste
    Uraz, Ahu
    Hatipoglu, Hasan
    Yalim, Mehmet
    MATERIALS, 2021, 14 (04) : 1 - 13