Biological mechanisms of marine invasions

被引:53
|
作者
Papacostas, Katherine J. [1 ]
Rielly-Carroll, Elizabeth W. [1 ]
Georgian, Samuel E. [1 ]
Long, Dustin J. [1 ]
Princiotta, Sarah D. [1 ]
Quattrini, Andrea M. [1 ]
Reuter, Kim E. [1 ]
Freestone, Amy L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Temple Univ, Dept Biol, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Species invasion; Non-native; Negative interactions; Competition; Consumer pressure; Positive interactions; Invader traits; Evolution; DARWINS NATURALIZATION HYPOTHESIS; ALGA CAULERPA-TAXIFOLIA; BIOTIC RESISTANCE; PROPAGULE PRESSURE; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS; FUNCTIONAL DIVERSITY; RECONCILING PATTERN; SPECIES RICHNESS; NONNATIVE OYSTER; CARCINUS-MAENAS;
D O I
10.3354/meps12001
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
With expanding trade resulting in increased global transport of non-native species, a broader understanding of the mechanisms of marine invasions is becoming increasingly crucial. Yet our understanding of marine invasions lags behind that of terrestrial invasions, and this includes our understanding of fundamental biological mechanisms that influence marine invasion success. We used a systematic search of over 3000 peer-reviewed papers to review the marine invasion literature, identify overarching patterns, and help direct future research. We focus on 4 biological mechanisms: negative interactions (e.g. limiting similarity, biotic resistance, enemy release, novel weapons), positive interactions, invader traits, and post-introduction evolution, as they relate to understanding marine invasion success. A total of 470 studies (264 non-native species) were reviewed, resulting in the largest review of biological mechanisms of marine invasions to date. Negative interactions and invader traits received the majority of attention in the literature. Most negative interaction studies documented an increase in invasion success resulting from avoidance or release from competitors or consumer pressure. Consumer pressure, and predation in particular, compared to competition was more commonly documented as a mechanism that can limit invasion success. Despite limited evaluation, positive interactions and post-introduction evolution showed potential for enhancing invasion success. Invader trait studies highlighted the importance of life history and stress tolerance traits. Future studies that examine interactions at multiple scales and utilize multi-faceted approaches, molecular techniques, and predictive modeling will enhance our knowledge and ability to develop strategies to protect native ecosystems.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 268
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] An evolutionary perspective on marine invasions
    Blakeslee, April M. H.
    Manousaki, Tereza
    Vasileiadou, Katerina
    Tepolt, Carolyn K.
    EVOLUTIONARY APPLICATIONS, 2020, 13 (03): : 479 - 485
  • [42] "Nested" cryptic diversity in a widespread marine ecosystem engineer: a challenge for detecting biological invasions
    Teske, Peter R.
    Rius, Marc
    McQuaid, Christopher D.
    Styan, Craig A.
    Piggott, Maxine P.
    Benhissoune, Said
    Fuentes-Gruenewald, Claudio
    Walls, Kathy
    Page, Mike
    Attard, Catherine R. M.
    Cooke, Georgina M.
    McClusky, Claire F.
    Banks, Sam C.
    Barker, Nigel P.
    Beheregaray, Luciano B.
    BMC EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2011, 11
  • [43] MARINE BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS AS MODELS OF DISPERSAL - TRACKING SECONDARY SPREAD AND INTROGRESSIVE GENE FLOW
    GELLER, JB
    CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE OCEANIC FISHERIES INVESTIGATIONS REPORTS, 1994, 35 : 68 - 72
  • [44] "Nested" cryptic diversity in a widespread marine ecosystem engineer: a challenge for detecting biological invasions
    Peter R Teske
    Marc Rius
    Christopher D McQuaid
    Craig A Styan
    Maxine P Piggott
    Saïd Benhissoune
    Claudio Fuentes-Grünewald
    Kathy Walls
    Mike Page
    Catherine RM Attard
    Georgina M Cooke
    Claire F McClusky
    Sam C Banks
    Nigel P Barker
    Luciano B Beheregaray
    BMC Evolutionary Biology, 11
  • [45] Recommendations for developing and applying genetic tools to assess and manage biological invasions in marine ecosystems
    Darling, John A.
    Galil, Bella S.
    Carvalho, Gary R.
    Rius, Marc
    Viard, Frederique
    Piraino, Stefano
    MARINE POLICY, 2017, 85 : 54 - 64
  • [46] Collateral damage: military invasions beget biological invasions
    Santini, Alberto
    Maresi, Giorgio
    Richardson, David M.
    Liebhold, Andrew M.
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 21 (10) : 469 - 478
  • [47] Microbial ecology of biological invasions
    van der Putten, Wim H.
    Klironomos, John N.
    Wardle, David A.
    ISME JOURNAL, 2007, 1 (01): : 28 - 37
  • [49] The journal Biological Invasions evolves
    Laura A. Meyerson
    Daniel Simberloff
    Biological Invasions, 2022, 24 : 319 - 320
  • [50] A Standardized Response to Biological Invasions
    Rashid, Irfan
    Sharma, Gyan Prakash
    Esler, Karen J.
    Reshi, Zafar A.
    Khuroo, Anzar A.
    Simpson, Annie
    SCIENCE, 2009, 325 (5937) : 146 - 146