Biological mechanisms of marine invasions

被引:53
|
作者
Papacostas, Katherine J. [1 ]
Rielly-Carroll, Elizabeth W. [1 ]
Georgian, Samuel E. [1 ]
Long, Dustin J. [1 ]
Princiotta, Sarah D. [1 ]
Quattrini, Andrea M. [1 ]
Reuter, Kim E. [1 ]
Freestone, Amy L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Temple Univ, Dept Biol, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Species invasion; Non-native; Negative interactions; Competition; Consumer pressure; Positive interactions; Invader traits; Evolution; DARWINS NATURALIZATION HYPOTHESIS; ALGA CAULERPA-TAXIFOLIA; BIOTIC RESISTANCE; PROPAGULE PRESSURE; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS; FUNCTIONAL DIVERSITY; RECONCILING PATTERN; SPECIES RICHNESS; NONNATIVE OYSTER; CARCINUS-MAENAS;
D O I
10.3354/meps12001
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
With expanding trade resulting in increased global transport of non-native species, a broader understanding of the mechanisms of marine invasions is becoming increasingly crucial. Yet our understanding of marine invasions lags behind that of terrestrial invasions, and this includes our understanding of fundamental biological mechanisms that influence marine invasion success. We used a systematic search of over 3000 peer-reviewed papers to review the marine invasion literature, identify overarching patterns, and help direct future research. We focus on 4 biological mechanisms: negative interactions (e.g. limiting similarity, biotic resistance, enemy release, novel weapons), positive interactions, invader traits, and post-introduction evolution, as they relate to understanding marine invasion success. A total of 470 studies (264 non-native species) were reviewed, resulting in the largest review of biological mechanisms of marine invasions to date. Negative interactions and invader traits received the majority of attention in the literature. Most negative interaction studies documented an increase in invasion success resulting from avoidance or release from competitors or consumer pressure. Consumer pressure, and predation in particular, compared to competition was more commonly documented as a mechanism that can limit invasion success. Despite limited evaluation, positive interactions and post-introduction evolution showed potential for enhancing invasion success. Invader trait studies highlighted the importance of life history and stress tolerance traits. Future studies that examine interactions at multiple scales and utilize multi-faceted approaches, molecular techniques, and predictive modeling will enhance our knowledge and ability to develop strategies to protect native ecosystems.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 268
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Biological invasions drive size increases in marine and estuarine invertebrates
    Grosholz, ED
    Ruiz, GM
    ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2003, 6 (08) : 700 - 705
  • [12] Marine biological invasions in waters of the port of Novorossiysk in the Black Sea
    Selifonova, Zh. P.
    RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF MARINE BIOLOGY, 2009, 35 (03) : 242 - 249
  • [13] PATTERNS OF TRANSOCEANIC MARINE BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS IN THE PACIFIC-OCEAN
    CARLTON, JT
    BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, 1987, 41 (02) : 452 - 465
  • [14] Rate of biological invasions is lower in coastal marine protected areas
    Ardura, A.
    Juanes, F.
    Planes, S.
    Garcia-Vazquez, E.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2016, 6
  • [15] Latitudinal Patterns of Biological Invasions in Marine Ecosystems: A Polar Perspective
    Ruiz, Gregory M.
    Hewitt, Chad L.
    SMITHSONIAN AT THE POLES: CONTRIBUTIONS TO INTERNATIONAL POLAR YEAR SCIENCE: A SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTION TO KNOWLEDGE, 2009, : 347 - 358
  • [16] Assessing the Effects of Marine Protected Areas on Biological Invasions: A Global Review
    Giakoumi, Sylvaine
    Pey, Alexis
    FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2017, 4
  • [17] Biological Invasions
    Daniel Simberloff
    Biodiversity & Conservation, 1998, 7 (5) : 697 - 699
  • [18] Biological invasions
    Carvallo, G. O.
    ECOSISTEMAS, 2009, 18 (01): : 95 - 96
  • [19] Biological invasions
    Windle, PN
    ISSUES IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 18 (02) : 19 - 20
  • [20] Biological invasions
    Levine, Jonathan M.
    CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2008, 18 (02) : R57 - R60