Prioritizing ecosystem services in rapidly urbanizing river basins: A spatial multi-criteria analytic approach

被引:58
|
作者
Vollmer, Derek [1 ,2 ]
Pribadi, Didit Okta [3 ]
Remondi, Federica [1 ,4 ]
Rustiadi, Ernan [5 ]
Gret-Regamey, Adrienne [2 ]
机构
[1] Singapore ETH Ctr Global Environm Sustainabil, Future Cities Lab, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Planning Landscape & Urban Syst, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Tech Univ Munich, Strateg Planning & Landscape Management, D-80290 Munich, Germany
[4] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Environm Engn, Zurich, Switzerland
[5] Bogor Agr Univ, Ctr Reg Syst Anal Planning & Dev, Bogor, Indonesia
关键词
Multi-criteria analysis; Ecosystem services; Regional planning; Tradeoffs; Land use; Hydrologic services; DECISION-ANALYSIS; CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK; TRADE-OFFS; MANAGEMENT; SUPPORT; CONSERVATION; EXPERIENCES; RECREATION; VALUATION; LANDSCAPE;
D O I
10.1016/j.scs.2015.10.004
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Spatially explicit information on ecosystem services can be an important input to regional spatial planning, but must be framed in a particular social context in order to be useful. We present a case study in metropolitan Jakarta, Indonesia, where stakeholders are discussing a spatial plan to help mitigate flooding risk, conserve scarce agricultural land, and restore forests in the upper catchment areas. We demonstrate an application of a four-step spatial multi-criteria analytical (MCA) approach that involves scenario development, ecosystem service quantification and mapping, preference weighting, and optimization to maximize preferred ecosystem services while minimizing cost. We improve upon similarly-oriented MCAs by incorporating information on ecosystem service potential, supply, beneficiaries, and likely costs to conserve them, with the aim of assisting stakeholders in negotiating future land development. Stakeholder-weighted preferences provide information on potential areas of conflict or agreement, but the aggregated weights do not have a significant impact on the optimization model's outputs. Our results also reveal possible synergies between, for example, biodiversity conservation and erosion control, which are typically considered and planned for by separate stakeholder groups. We also find that if we include monetary estimates of flood damages by sub-basin and population data by groundwater basin, optimal solutions include more expensive interventions when compared to a model omitting this information. Overall, our approach offers a transparent way to collect and process relevant information on regional ecosystem services, and can be particularly useful in areas where land use is changing rapidly and land use controls are either weak or decentralized. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 252
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Prioritizing pedestrian needs using a multi-criteria decision approach for a sustainable built environment in the Indian context
    G. R. Bivina
    Manoranjan Parida
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2020, 22 : 4929 - 4950
  • [42] An Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Approach for Prioritizing Failures That Cause Overproduction: A Case Study in Process Manufacturing
    Sudzum, Ranka
    Nestic, Snezana
    Komatina, Nikola
    Kraisnik, Milija
    AXIOMS, 2024, 13 (06)
  • [43] Prioritizing the barriers to tourism growth in rural India: an integrated multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) approach
    Jena, R. K.
    Dwivedi, Yogesh
    JOURNAL OF TOURISM FUTURES, 2023, 9 (03) : 393 - 416
  • [44] Quantitative Multi-Criteria Decision Support Approach for Prioritizing Grade Crossings to Address the Problem of Blocked Crossings
    Prodan, Aleksandr
    Sakhrani, Vivek
    Roy, Marc-Andre
    Dietrich, Matthew
    Phinney, Scott N.
    McClory, Megan
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2022, 2676 (01) : 142 - 151
  • [45] Prioritizing pedestrian needs using a multi-criteria decision approach for a sustainable built environment in the Indian context
    Bivina, G. R.
    Parida, Manoranjan
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 22 (05) : 4929 - 4950
  • [46] A multi-criteria approach for prioritizing advanced public transport modes (APTM) considering urban types in Korea
    Lee, Deok-Joo
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2018, 111 : 148 - 161
  • [47] A multi-criteria spatial approach for determination of the logistics center locations in metropolitan areas
    Onden, Ismail
    Eldemir, Fahrettin
    RESEARCH IN TRANSPORTATION BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 44
  • [48] Environmental Location Assessment for Seaweed Cultivation in Ghana: A Spatial Multi-Criteria Approach
    Segbefia, Alexander Yao
    Barnes, Victor Rex
    Akpalu, Lawrence Atsu
    Mensah, Moses
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOSPATIAL RESEARCH, 2018, 9 (01) : 51 - 64
  • [49] Multi-criteria Assessment of Potential Check Dam Location for Sustainable Development in Urban River Basins of the Eastern Mediterranean
    Abdo, Hazem Ghassan
    Richi, Sahar Mohammed
    Alshayeb, Mohammed J.
    Prasad, Pankaj
    Zeng, Taorui
    Halder, Bijay
    Alharbi, Maged Muteb
    Hang, Hoang Thi
    Albanai, Jasem A.
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2025, : 2149 - 2175
  • [50] Multi-criteria site selection for fire services: the interaction with analytic hierarchy process and geographic information systems
    Erden, T.
    Coskun, M. Z.
    NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2010, 10 (10) : 2127 - 2134