Prioritizing ecosystem services in rapidly urbanizing river basins: A spatial multi-criteria analytic approach

被引:58
|
作者
Vollmer, Derek [1 ,2 ]
Pribadi, Didit Okta [3 ]
Remondi, Federica [1 ,4 ]
Rustiadi, Ernan [5 ]
Gret-Regamey, Adrienne [2 ]
机构
[1] Singapore ETH Ctr Global Environm Sustainabil, Future Cities Lab, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Planning Landscape & Urban Syst, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Tech Univ Munich, Strateg Planning & Landscape Management, D-80290 Munich, Germany
[4] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Environm Engn, Zurich, Switzerland
[5] Bogor Agr Univ, Ctr Reg Syst Anal Planning & Dev, Bogor, Indonesia
关键词
Multi-criteria analysis; Ecosystem services; Regional planning; Tradeoffs; Land use; Hydrologic services; DECISION-ANALYSIS; CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK; TRADE-OFFS; MANAGEMENT; SUPPORT; CONSERVATION; EXPERIENCES; RECREATION; VALUATION; LANDSCAPE;
D O I
10.1016/j.scs.2015.10.004
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Spatially explicit information on ecosystem services can be an important input to regional spatial planning, but must be framed in a particular social context in order to be useful. We present a case study in metropolitan Jakarta, Indonesia, where stakeholders are discussing a spatial plan to help mitigate flooding risk, conserve scarce agricultural land, and restore forests in the upper catchment areas. We demonstrate an application of a four-step spatial multi-criteria analytical (MCA) approach that involves scenario development, ecosystem service quantification and mapping, preference weighting, and optimization to maximize preferred ecosystem services while minimizing cost. We improve upon similarly-oriented MCAs by incorporating information on ecosystem service potential, supply, beneficiaries, and likely costs to conserve them, with the aim of assisting stakeholders in negotiating future land development. Stakeholder-weighted preferences provide information on potential areas of conflict or agreement, but the aggregated weights do not have a significant impact on the optimization model's outputs. Our results also reveal possible synergies between, for example, biodiversity conservation and erosion control, which are typically considered and planned for by separate stakeholder groups. We also find that if we include monetary estimates of flood damages by sub-basin and population data by groundwater basin, optimal solutions include more expensive interventions when compared to a model omitting this information. Overall, our approach offers a transparent way to collect and process relevant information on regional ecosystem services, and can be particularly useful in areas where land use is changing rapidly and land use controls are either weak or decentralized. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 252
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A multi-criteria approach to construction site spatial analysis and simulation
    Tawfik, Hissam
    Fernando, Terrence
    Nagar, Atulya K.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 15TH IASTED INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED SIMULATION AND MODELLING, 2006, : 423 - +
  • [22] Spatial and temporal characteristics and driving mechanisms of recreational ecosystem services supply-demand mismatch in rapidly urbanizing areas: Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta
    Tang, Ruien
    Hou, Guolin
    Chen, Yueyi
    Liu, Xiao
    Chu, Shaoying
    Li, Li
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2025, 171
  • [23] Application of the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process in multi-criteria decision in noise action plans: Prioritizing road stretches
    Ruiz-Padillo, Alejandro
    Torija, Antonio J.
    Ramos-Ridao, A. F.
    Ruiz, Diego P.
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2016, 81 : 45 - 55
  • [24] Ecosystem services-based multi-criteria assessment for ecologically sensitive watershed management
    Tezer, Azime
    Turkay, Zeynep
    Uzun, Osman
    Terzi, Fatih
    Koylu, Pinar
    Karacor, Elif
    Okay, Nilgun
    Kaya, Melek
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 22 (03) : 2431 - 2450
  • [25] Ecosystem services-based multi-criteria assessment for ecologically sensitive watershed management
    Azime Tezer
    Zeynep Turkay
    Osman Uzun
    Fatih Terzi
    Pinar Koylu
    Elif Karacor
    Nilgun Okay
    Melek Kaya
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2020, 22 : 2431 - 2450
  • [26] Multi-criteria supplier selection model using the analytic hierarchy process approach
    Yadav, Vinod
    Sharma, Milind Kumar
    JOURNAL OF MODELLING IN MANAGEMENT, 2016, 11 (01) : 326 - 354
  • [27] Walking as soft mobility: A multi-criteria GIS-based approach for prioritizing tourist routes
    Ghazal Hassanshahi
    Ali Soltani
    Maryam Roosta
    Sajad Askari
    Frontiers of Architectural Research, 2023, 12 (06) : 1080 - 1096
  • [28] A multi-criteria approach for an integrated land-cover-based assessment of ecosystem services provision to support landscape planning
    Koschke, Lars
    Fuerst, Christine
    Frank, Susanne
    Makeschin, Franz
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2012, 21 : 54 - 66
  • [29] Walking as soft mobility: A multi-criteria GIS-based approach for prioritizing tourist routes
    Hassanshahi, Ghazal
    Soltani, Ali
    Roosta, Maryam
    Askari, Sajad
    FRONTIERS OF ARCHITECTURAL RESEARCH, 2023, 12 (06) : 1080 - 1096
  • [30] EVALUATION OF THE LOGISTICS CENTER LOCATIONS USING A MULTI-CRITERIA SPATIAL APPROACH
    Onden, Ismail
    Acar, Avni Zafer
    Eldemir, Fahrettin
    TRANSPORT, 2018, 33 (02) : 322 - 334