A comparative analysis of the effects of economic policy instruments in promoting environmentally sustainable transport

被引:12
|
作者
Elvik, Rune [1 ,2 ]
Ramjerdi, Farideh [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Transport Econ, NO-0349 Oslo, Norway
[2] Dept Civil Engn, Traff Res Grp, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark
关键词
Economic policy instrument; Environmentally sustainable transport; Elasticity; Review; Meta-analysis; PUBLICATION BIAS; GASOLINE DEMAND; LONDON; METAANALYSIS; SCHEME; SPEED; COST; FILL; TRIM; PAY;
D O I
10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.02.025
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper presents a comparative analysis of the effects of economic policy instruments in promoting environmentally sustainable transport. Promoting environmentally sustainable transport is defined as follows: (1) Reducing the volume of motorised travel; (2) Transferring travel to modes generating less external effects, and (3) Modifying road user behaviour in a way that will reduce external effects of transport. External effects include accidents, congestion, traffic noise and emissions to air. Four economic policy instruments are compared: (1) Prices of motor fuel; (2) Congestion charges; (3) Toll schemes; (4) Reward systems giving incentives to reduce driving or change driver behaviour. The effects of these policy instruments are stated in terms of elasticities. All four economic policy instruments have negative elasticities, which means that they do promote environmentally sustainable transport. Long-term elasticities tend to be larger than short term elasticities. The long-term elasticities of reward systems are unknown. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 95
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Sustainable Transport Infrastructure and Economic Returns: A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis
    Badassa, Bayissa Badada
    Sun, Baiqing
    Qiao, Lixin
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (05)
  • [42] Organic Analysis and Policy Suggestions on Technical Innovation in Promoting Economic Growth
    Liu Aiqin
    [J]. ADVANCES IN MANAGEMENT OF TECHNOLOGY, PT 1, 2008, : 90 - 96
  • [43] Agrarian policies for sustainable land use: Bio-economic modelling to assess the effectiveness of policy instruments
    Kruseman, G
    Bade, J
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 1998, 58 (03) : 465 - 481
  • [44] Actualizing sustainable transport: the interplay between public policy instruments and shared mobility providers' business models
    Kriukelyte, Erika
    Sochor, Jana
    Kramers, Anna
    [J]. EUROPEAN TRANSPORT RESEARCH REVIEW, 2024, 16 (01)
  • [45] Actualizing sustainable transport: the interplay between public policy instruments and shared mobility providers’ business models
    Erika Kriukelyte
    Jana Sochor
    Anna Kramers
    [J]. European Transport Research Review, 16
  • [46] Effects of public policy interventions for environmentally sustainable food consumption: a systematic map of available evidence
    Ran, Ylva
    Van Rysselberge, Pierre
    Macura, Biljana
    Persson, U. Martin
    Abu Hatab, Assem
    Jonell, Malin
    Lindahl, Therese
    Roos, Elin
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL EVIDENCE, 2024, 13 (01)
  • [47] Policy instruments for soil protection among the EU member states: A comparative analysis
    Ronchi, Silvia
    Salata, Stefano
    Arcidiacono, Andrea
    Piroli, Erika
    Montanarella, Luca
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2019, 82 : 763 - 780
  • [48] Comparative Analysis of Economic Instruments in Intersection Operation: A User-Based Perspective
    Lin, Dianchao
    Jabari, Saif Eddin
    [J]. 2020 IEEE 23RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITSC), 2020,
  • [49] Passenger transport in Nigeria: Environmental and economic analysis with policy recommendations
    Gujba, H.
    Mulugetta, Y.
    Azapagic, A.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 55 : 353 - 361
  • [50] Competence distribution and policy implementation efficiency towards sustainable urban transport: A comparative study
    Shibayama, Takeru
    [J]. RESEARCH IN TRANSPORTATION ECONOMICS, 2020, 83