A comparative analysis of the effects of economic policy instruments in promoting environmentally sustainable transport

被引:12
|
作者
Elvik, Rune [1 ,2 ]
Ramjerdi, Farideh [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Transport Econ, NO-0349 Oslo, Norway
[2] Dept Civil Engn, Traff Res Grp, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark
关键词
Economic policy instrument; Environmentally sustainable transport; Elasticity; Review; Meta-analysis; PUBLICATION BIAS; GASOLINE DEMAND; LONDON; METAANALYSIS; SCHEME; SPEED; COST; FILL; TRIM; PAY;
D O I
10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.02.025
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper presents a comparative analysis of the effects of economic policy instruments in promoting environmentally sustainable transport. Promoting environmentally sustainable transport is defined as follows: (1) Reducing the volume of motorised travel; (2) Transferring travel to modes generating less external effects, and (3) Modifying road user behaviour in a way that will reduce external effects of transport. External effects include accidents, congestion, traffic noise and emissions to air. Four economic policy instruments are compared: (1) Prices of motor fuel; (2) Congestion charges; (3) Toll schemes; (4) Reward systems giving incentives to reduce driving or change driver behaviour. The effects of these policy instruments are stated in terms of elasticities. All four economic policy instruments have negative elasticities, which means that they do promote environmentally sustainable transport. Long-term elasticities tend to be larger than short term elasticities. The long-term elasticities of reward systems are unknown. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 95
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Informational Policy Instruments for Environmentally Sustainable Buildings: A comparative study on HK-BEAM and LEED
    Qian, K. Queena
    Chan, H. W. Edwin
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF CRIOCM 2008 INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH SYMPOSIUM ON ADVANCES OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND REAL ESTATE, 2008, : 293 - 299
  • [2] The impact of economic policy instruments on the conditions of sustainable economic growth
    Altunyan, Armen
    Kotcofana, Tatiana
    Bazzhina, Viktoria
    [J]. 19TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE GLOBALIZATION AND ITS SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES 2019 - SUSTAINABILITY IN THE GLOBAL-KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, 2020, 74
  • [3] Bicycle superhighway: An environmentally sustainable policy for urban transport
    Agarwal, Amit
    Ziemke, Dominik
    Nagel, Kai
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2020, 137 : 519 - 540
  • [4] Policy Planning for Environmentally Sustainable Transport in Beijing, China
    Wang, Zhen
    Yu, Shuxia
    [J]. MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, PTS 1-3, 2011, 295-297 : 2374 - +
  • [5] The Effects of Economic Policy Instruments of Diffuse Water Pollution from Agriculture: A Comparative Analysis of China and the UK
    Zou, Jinpeng
    Chen, Xiaodong
    Liu, Fang
    Wang, Fang
    Du, Mingling
    Wu, Bin
    Yang, Ni
    [J]. WATER, 2023, 15 (04)
  • [6] Effects and success factors of sustainable consumption policy instruments: a comparative assessment across Europe
    Wolff, Franziska
    Schoenherr, Norma
    Heyen, Dirk Arne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY & PLANNING, 2017, 19 (04) : 457 - 472
  • [7] HOW GREEN ARE CONGESTION CHARGES - ECONOMIC INSTRUMENTS AND SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT
    NEALE, A
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF URBAN AND REGIONAL RESEARCH, 1995, 19 (03) : 447 - 455
  • [8] Effectiveness and macroeconomic impact analysis of policy instruments for sustainable transport in Korea: A CGE modeling approach
    Lee, S
    Lim, J
    [J]. URBAN TRANSPORT VIII: URBAN TRANSPORT AND THE ENVIRONMENT IN THE 21ST CENTURY, 2002, 12 : 721 - 732
  • [9] Towards sustainable urban transport in Singapore: Policy instruments and mobility trends
    Diao, Mi
    [J]. TRANSPORT POLICY, 2019, 81 : 320 - 330
  • [10] Sustainable tramway, techno-economic analysis and environmental effects in an urban public transport. A comparative study
    Cano, Antonio
    Arevalo, Paul
    Benavides, Dario
    Jurado, Francisco
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE ENERGY GRIDS & NETWORKS, 2021, 26