Validation of current procedural terminology codes for surgical stabilization of rib fractures

被引:0
|
作者
Leasia, K. [1 ]
Douglas, I [1 ]
Lawless, R. [1 ]
Burlew, C. C. [1 ]
Platnick, K. B. [1 ]
Moore, E. E. [1 ]
Pieracci, F. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Denver Hlth & Hosp Author, 777 Bannock St MC 0206, Denver, CO 80204 USA
关键词
Rib fractures; Surgical stabilization of rib fractures; Current procedural terminology;
D O I
10.1016/j.injury.2020.09.004
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction: Current procedural terminology (CPT) codes for surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) are based solely on the number of ribs fixed, tricotomized at 1-3, 4-6, and >= 7. Our objective was to validate CPT codes against operative time at our institution, as well as further stratify complexity by rib fracture location and surgical approach. The purpose of this study is to validate the current CPT coding schema for SSRF, and to identify potential modifiers that are associated with increased case complexity. We hypothesized that operative time is associated with CPT code, number of fractures repaired, exposure technique, and fracture location. Methods: Retrospective review of SSRF cases from October 2010 to March 2020. The primary outcome was the length of the operation (minutes). Predictor variables were CPT code, number of fractures repaired (grouped similarly to CPT codes), fractures repaired:ribs repaired ratio > 1, fracture location (subscapular vs. other), and positioning/exposure (supine, lateral, prone, and multiple). Kaplan-Meier time-to-event analyses were used to assess relationship with operative time. Results: 188 patients underwent repair of 904 fractures. Operative time was significantly associated with both number of ribs repaired and number of fractures repaired (p<0.01). Although operative time varied significantly by CPT group (p<0.01), there was no significant difference between the 4-6 rib and the = 7 rib groups (p = 0.33). By contrast, each group was significantly different from the others when organized by number of fractures repaired (p = 0.04). Operative time was significantly longer when the fractures repaired:ribs repaired ratio was > 1 (p<0.01), even after stratifying by number of ribs repaired. Both multiple positions/exposures (p<0.01), and repair of >= 1 sub-scapular fracture (p<0.01) were significantly associated with operative time. Conclusion: Number of fractures repaired provided a more accurate estimation of operative time as compared to number of ribs repaired. Based on these data, we recommend altering the CPT schema for SSRF to involve number of fractures repaired, with modifiers for both multiple positions/exposures and repair of sub-scapular fractures. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:2500 / 2506
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Surgical stabilization of iatrogenic rib fractures following cardiopulmonary resuscitation
    Spardy, Jeffrey
    Kornblith, Lucy
    Elkbuli, Adel
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 59 : 195 - 197
  • [42] Surgical stabilization of posterior rib fractures involving the costotransverse joint
    alvarez-Ortega, Astrid Carolina
    Posso-Nunez, Jose Alejandro
    Torres-Espana, Nicolas Felipe
    Garcia-Gonzalez, Carlos Alejandro
    Sanchez-Ortiz, alvaro I.
    Velasquez-Galvis, Mauricio
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2025, 51 (01)
  • [43] Educational assessment of intrathoracic and extrathoracic surgical stabilization of rib fractures
    Frank, Madelyn
    Sargent, Brynn
    Tay-Lasso, Erika
    Hovis, Gabrielle
    Kincaid, Colin
    Grant, William
    Alaniz, Leonardo
    Yi, Justin
    Chin, Theresa L.
    Barrios, Cristobal
    Nahmias, Jeffry
    Pieracci, Fredric
    Schubl, Sebastian
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2023, 54 (01): : 63 - 69
  • [44] Time to surgical stabilization of rib fractures: does it impact outcomes?
    Forrester, Joseph D.
    Sarani, Babak
    Forssten, Maximilian Peter
    Cao, Yang
    Hildebrand, Frank
    Ismail, Ahmad Mohammad
    Ribeiro Jr., Marcelo A. F.
    Mohseni, Shahin
    TRAUMA SURGERY & ACUTE CARE OPEN, 2024, 9 (01)
  • [45] Intercostal nerve cryoablation during surgical stabilization of rib fractures
    Choi, Jeff
    Min, Jung Gi
    Jopling, Jeffrey K.
    Meshkin, Sean
    Bessoff, Kovi E.
    Forrester, Joseph D.
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2021, 91 (06): : 976 - 980
  • [46] Surgical Site Infection after Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures: Rare but Morbid
    Prins, Jonne T. H.
    Leasia, Kiara
    Dull, Matthew B.
    Lawless, Ryan A.
    Platnick, K. Barry
    Werner, Nicole L.
    Wijffels, Mathieu M. E.
    Moore, Ernest E.
    Pieracci, Fredric M.
    SURGICAL INFECTIONS, 2022, 23 (01) : 5 - 11
  • [47] Variability in Current Procedural Terminology Codes for Craniomaxillofacial Trauma Reconstruction: A National Survey
    Jazayeri, Hossein E.
    Khavanin, Nima
    Yu, Jason W.
    Wu, Brendan
    Payne, Eric
    Mundinger, Gerhard S.
    Patel, Kamlesh B.
    Peacock, Zachary S.
    Villa, Mark T.
    Dorafshar, Amir H.
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2020, 31 (04) : 996 - 999
  • [48] Reliability of assigning correct current procedural terminology - 4 E/M codes
    Bentley, PN
    Wilson, AG
    Derwin, ME
    Scodellaro, R
    Jackson, RE
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2002, 40 (03) : 269 - 274
  • [49] Differentiating abdominal procedures in pediatric surgery: The inadequacy of current procedural terminology codes
    Li, Yiping
    Shaul, Donald B.
    Sydorak, Roman M.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2018, 53 (09) : 1811 - 1814
  • [50] The Full Scope of Family Physicians' Work Is Not Reflected by Current Procedural Terminology Codes
    Young, Richard A.
    Burge, Sandy
    Kumar, Kaparaboyna Ashok
    Wilson, Jocelyn
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2017, 30 (06) : 724 - +