Validation of current procedural terminology codes for surgical stabilization of rib fractures

被引:0
|
作者
Leasia, K. [1 ]
Douglas, I [1 ]
Lawless, R. [1 ]
Burlew, C. C. [1 ]
Platnick, K. B. [1 ]
Moore, E. E. [1 ]
Pieracci, F. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Denver Hlth & Hosp Author, 777 Bannock St MC 0206, Denver, CO 80204 USA
关键词
Rib fractures; Surgical stabilization of rib fractures; Current procedural terminology;
D O I
10.1016/j.injury.2020.09.004
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction: Current procedural terminology (CPT) codes for surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) are based solely on the number of ribs fixed, tricotomized at 1-3, 4-6, and >= 7. Our objective was to validate CPT codes against operative time at our institution, as well as further stratify complexity by rib fracture location and surgical approach. The purpose of this study is to validate the current CPT coding schema for SSRF, and to identify potential modifiers that are associated with increased case complexity. We hypothesized that operative time is associated with CPT code, number of fractures repaired, exposure technique, and fracture location. Methods: Retrospective review of SSRF cases from October 2010 to March 2020. The primary outcome was the length of the operation (minutes). Predictor variables were CPT code, number of fractures repaired (grouped similarly to CPT codes), fractures repaired:ribs repaired ratio > 1, fracture location (subscapular vs. other), and positioning/exposure (supine, lateral, prone, and multiple). Kaplan-Meier time-to-event analyses were used to assess relationship with operative time. Results: 188 patients underwent repair of 904 fractures. Operative time was significantly associated with both number of ribs repaired and number of fractures repaired (p<0.01). Although operative time varied significantly by CPT group (p<0.01), there was no significant difference between the 4-6 rib and the = 7 rib groups (p = 0.33). By contrast, each group was significantly different from the others when organized by number of fractures repaired (p = 0.04). Operative time was significantly longer when the fractures repaired:ribs repaired ratio was > 1 (p<0.01), even after stratifying by number of ribs repaired. Both multiple positions/exposures (p<0.01), and repair of >= 1 sub-scapular fracture (p<0.01) were significantly associated with operative time. Conclusion: Number of fractures repaired provided a more accurate estimation of operative time as compared to number of ribs repaired. Based on these data, we recommend altering the CPT schema for SSRF to involve number of fractures repaired, with modifiers for both multiple positions/exposures and repair of sub-scapular fractures. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:2500 / 2506
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A new instrument for surgical stabilization of multiple rib fractures
    Xiong Jian
    Wu Lei
    Pi Yuyang
    Xu Yongdong
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 48 (02)
  • [22] Surgical stabilization of severe rib fractures: Several caveats
    Mayberry, John
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2015, 79 (03): : 515 - 515
  • [23] SURGICAL STABILIZATION OF RIB FRACTURES Indications, Techniques, and Pitfalls
    Fokin, Alexander A.
    Hus, Nir
    Wycech, Joanna
    Rodriguez, Eugenio
    Puente, Ivan
    JBJS ESSENTIAL SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 10 (02):
  • [24] Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures: A Single Institution Experience
    Kane, Erica D.
    Jeremitsky, Elan
    Bittner, Katharine R.
    Kartiko, Susan
    Doben, Andrew R.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2018, 226 (06) : 961 - 966
  • [25] Benchmarking Anesthesia and Surgical Control Times by Common Procedural Terminology Codes
    Alvey, Nicholas
    Simmons, Colby
    Weitzel, Nathaen
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2020, 130 : 750 - 753
  • [26] Validation of current procedural terminology codes for rotavirus vaccination among infants in two commercially insured US populations
    Hoffman, Veena
    Everage, Nicholas J.
    Quinlan, Scott C.
    Skerry, Kathleen
    Esposito, Daina
    Praet, Nicolas
    Rosillon, Dominique
    Holick, Crystal N.
    Dore, David D.
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2016, 25 (12) : 1465 - 1469
  • [27] Current Procedural Terminology Codes for Medication Therapy Management in Administrative Data
    Axon, David R.
    Chinthammit, Chanadda
    Tate, Jared
    Taylor, Ann M.
    Leal, Sandra
    Pickering, Matthew
    Black, Heather
    Warholak, Terri
    Campbell, Patrick J.
    JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE & SPECIALTY PHARMACY, 2020, 26 (10): : 1297 - 1300
  • [28] Developing current procedural terminology codes that describe the work performed by machines
    Richard A. Frank
    Robert Jarrin
    Jordan Pritzker
    Michael D. Abramoff
    Michael X. Repka
    Pat D. Baird
    S. Marlene Grenon
    Megan Ruth Mahoney
    John E. Mattison
    Ezequiel Silva
    npj Digital Medicine, 5
  • [29] Developing current procedural terminology codes that describe the work performed by machines
    Frank, Richard A. A.
    Jarrin, Robert
    Pritzker, Jordan
    Abramoff, Michael D. D.
    Repka, Michael X. X.
    Baird, Pat D. D.
    Grenon, S. Marlene
    Mahoney, Megan Ruth
    Mattison, John E. E.
    Silva III, Ezequiel
    NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE, 2022, 5 (01)
  • [30] New Current Procedural Terminology Category III Codes Generate Questions
    Schaum, Kathleen D.
    ADVANCES IN SKIN & WOUND CARE, 2021, 34 (09) : 458 - 460