3D printable biomaterials for orthopedic implants: Solution for sustainable and circular economy

被引:55
|
作者
Yadav, Dinesh [1 ]
Garg, Ramesh Kumar [1 ]
Ahlawat, Akash [2 ]
Chhabra, Deepak [2 ]
机构
[1] Deenbandhu Chhotu Ram Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Sonepat, Haryana, India
[2] Maharshi Dayanand Univ, Univ Inst Engn & Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Rohtak, Haryana, India
关键词
Biomaterials; 3D printable; Bioresorbable; Metallic; Sustainable; BETA-TRICALCIUM PHOSPHATE; OF-THE-ART; IN-VIVO; BIOACTIVE GLASSES; NANOCRYSTALLINE DIAMOND; BIODEGRADABLE POLYMERS; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; PROCESS PARAMETERS; BONE; HYDROXYAPATITE;
D O I
10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101767
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the last few years, 3d printable biomaterials has been tremendously utilized in the fabrication of orthopaedic implants because of its light weight, minimum material wastage, porous structure for tissue growth, ease of making patient specific and any complex topology implants. The sustainability of 3D printing technique along with using sustainable biomaterials made the development of implants more accurate, compatible with human body along with 3 R's i.e. reduce, reuse and recyclable. This R-framework includes three methods of rising circular economy which make orthopedics healthcare more capable beyond the limits of traditional strategies and results on demand patient specific implant production with increased durability Operation Management apart from 3R concept also use ReSOLVE framework i.e. Regenerate, Share, Optimize, Loop, Virtualize and Exchange to organize circularity principles in business model. In this work, 3D printable and traditional materials are classified on the basis of sustainability and circularity concept. The permanent metallic biomaterials and the resorbables biomaterials have been comprehensively reviewed with the emphasis on reutilization, biocompatibility and mechanical properties. The 95% of the orthopaedic implants still using metallic biomaterials because of their high ultimate tensile strength (UTS), fatigue strength, durability and toughness. Advance surface treatments are needed to make metallic materials implants biocompatible. It is observed that bioresorbable implants are the solution for sustainability as compare to permanent biomaterials. The main concern of the bioresorbable implants is the low UTS, which limits its usage only for soft bones and not for long bones where higher UTS is a necessity. The 3D printed implants have low fatigue strength because of imperfections. For longer bones, more 3D printable bioresorbable materials need to be developed with higher UTS, toughness and fatigue strength so as to broaden their application base. These 3D printable bioresorbable materials will make orthopaedic industry more sustainable and oriented towards circular economy.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A 3D PRINTABLE CEMENT FOR BONE REGENERATION
    Germaini, Marie-Michele
    Germaini, Marie-Michele
    Weiss, Pierre
    Belhabib, Sofiane
    Guessasma, Sofiane
    Veziers, Joelle
    Nedellec, Steven
    Gautier, Helene
    Halgand, Boris
    Furet, Benoit
    Deterre, Remi
    Rouillon, Thierry
    Corre, Pierre
    TISSUE ENGINEERING PART A, 2022, 28 : S64 - S65
  • [42] Mechanical characterization of 3D printable concrete
    Rahul, A., V
    Santhanam, Manu
    Meena, Hitesh
    Ghani, Zimam
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2019, 227
  • [44] 3D Printable Antimicrobial Polymer Blend
    Daniels, Miche
    Rautenbach, Marina
    du Plessis, Anton
    Pfukwa, Rueben
    MACROMOLECULAR MATERIALS AND ENGINEERING, 2024, 309 (08)
  • [45] 3D Printable Vapochromic Sensing Materials
    Stevens, David M.
    Gray, Bonnie L.
    Leznoff, Daniel B.
    Furukawa, Hidemitsu
    Khosla, Ajit
    JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2020, 167 (16)
  • [46] The Development of 3D Printable Stretch Bioreactors
    Howell, Andrew
    Fischer, Kristin
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2020, 34
  • [47] Iodine-Doped 3D Print Ti Alloy for Antibacterial Therapy on Orthopedic Implants
    Hu, Xiaodong
    Zhong, Jiaqi
    Ao, Haiyong
    Wu, Xinhui
    Chen, Yujiong
    Peng, Zhaoxiang
    ACS OMEGA, 2023, 8 (36): : 32990 - 32997
  • [48] Covalent heparin immobilization on new developed 3D-printable biomaterials
    Novosel, Esther
    Meyer, Wolfdietrich
    Wegener, Michael
    Krueger, Hartmut
    Borchers, Kirsten
    Kluger, Petra
    Tovar, Guenter
    Walles, Heike
    Hirth, Thomas
    TISSUE ENGINEERING PART A, 2011, 17 (3-4) : 568 - 568
  • [49] Designing Biomaterials for 3D Printing
    Guvendiren, Murat
    Molde, Joseph
    Soares, Rosane M. D.
    Kohn, Joachim
    ACS BIOMATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, 2016, 2 (10): : 1679 - 1693
  • [50] 3D Bioprinting of Lignocellulosic Biomaterials
    Shavandi, Amin
    Hosseini, Soraya
    Okoro, Oseweuba Valentine
    Nie, Lei
    Eghbali Babadi, Farahnaz
    Melchels, Ferry
    ADVANCED HEALTHCARE MATERIALS, 2020, 9 (24)