3D printable biomaterials for orthopedic implants: Solution for sustainable and circular economy

被引:55
|
作者
Yadav, Dinesh [1 ]
Garg, Ramesh Kumar [1 ]
Ahlawat, Akash [2 ]
Chhabra, Deepak [2 ]
机构
[1] Deenbandhu Chhotu Ram Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Sonepat, Haryana, India
[2] Maharshi Dayanand Univ, Univ Inst Engn & Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Rohtak, Haryana, India
关键词
Biomaterials; 3D printable; Bioresorbable; Metallic; Sustainable; BETA-TRICALCIUM PHOSPHATE; OF-THE-ART; IN-VIVO; BIOACTIVE GLASSES; NANOCRYSTALLINE DIAMOND; BIODEGRADABLE POLYMERS; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; PROCESS PARAMETERS; BONE; HYDROXYAPATITE;
D O I
10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101767
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the last few years, 3d printable biomaterials has been tremendously utilized in the fabrication of orthopaedic implants because of its light weight, minimum material wastage, porous structure for tissue growth, ease of making patient specific and any complex topology implants. The sustainability of 3D printing technique along with using sustainable biomaterials made the development of implants more accurate, compatible with human body along with 3 R's i.e. reduce, reuse and recyclable. This R-framework includes three methods of rising circular economy which make orthopedics healthcare more capable beyond the limits of traditional strategies and results on demand patient specific implant production with increased durability Operation Management apart from 3R concept also use ReSOLVE framework i.e. Regenerate, Share, Optimize, Loop, Virtualize and Exchange to organize circularity principles in business model. In this work, 3D printable and traditional materials are classified on the basis of sustainability and circularity concept. The permanent metallic biomaterials and the resorbables biomaterials have been comprehensively reviewed with the emphasis on reutilization, biocompatibility and mechanical properties. The 95% of the orthopaedic implants still using metallic biomaterials because of their high ultimate tensile strength (UTS), fatigue strength, durability and toughness. Advance surface treatments are needed to make metallic materials implants biocompatible. It is observed that bioresorbable implants are the solution for sustainability as compare to permanent biomaterials. The main concern of the bioresorbable implants is the low UTS, which limits its usage only for soft bones and not for long bones where higher UTS is a necessity. The 3D printed implants have low fatigue strength because of imperfections. For longer bones, more 3D printable bioresorbable materials need to be developed with higher UTS, toughness and fatigue strength so as to broaden their application base. These 3D printable bioresorbable materials will make orthopaedic industry more sustainable and oriented towards circular economy.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] 3D Printable Graphene Composite
    Wei, Xiaojun
    Li, Dong
    Jiang, Wei
    Gu, Zheming
    Wang, Xiaojuan
    Zhang, Zengxing
    Sun, Zhengzong
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2015, 5
  • [22] 3D Printable Graphene Composite
    Xiaojun Wei
    Dong Li
    Wei Jiang
    Zheming Gu
    Xiaojuan Wang
    Zengxing Zhang
    Zhengzong Sun
    Scientific Reports, 5
  • [23] A 3D printable tissue adhesive
    Sarah J. Wu
    Jingjing Wu
    Samuel J. Kaser
    Heejung Roh
    Ruth D. Shiferaw
    Hyunwoo Yuk
    Xuanhe Zhao
    Nature Communications, 15
  • [24] Design of sustainable 3D printable polylactic acid composites with high lignin content
    Ren, Zechun
    Zhou, Xinyuan
    Ding, Kejiao
    Ji, Tong
    Sun, Hao
    Chi, Xiang
    Wei, Yunzhao
    Xu, Min
    Cai, Liping
    Xia, Changlei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL MACROMOLECULES, 2023, 253
  • [25] Waste materials utilization in 3D printable concrete for sustainable construction applications: a review
    Irshidat, Mohammad
    Cabibihan, John-John
    Fadli, Fodil
    Al-Ramahi, Siraj
    Saadeh, Marwa
    EMERGENT MATERIALS, 2024,
  • [26] 3D printing of biomaterials
    Amit Bandyopadhyay
    Susmita Bose
    Suman Das
    MRS Bulletin, 2015, 40 : 108 - 115
  • [27] Influence of mixture composition and carbonation curing on properties of sustainable 3D printable mortars
    Srinivas, Dodda
    Panda, Biranchi
    Suraneni, Prannoy
    Sitharam, T. G.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2025, 492
  • [28] 3D printing of biomaterials
    Bandyopadhyay, Amit
    Bose, Susmita
    Das, Suman
    MRS BULLETIN, 2015, 40 (02) : 108 - 112
  • [29] Awareness of 3D Printing for Sustainable Construction in an Emerging Economy
    Oke, Ayodeji Emmanuel
    Atofarati, John Oluwatosin
    Bello, Sherifat Folasade
    CONSTRUCTION ECONOMICS AND BUILDING, 2022, 22 (02): : 52 - 68
  • [30] Tunable scaffolds from novel, 3D-printable biomaterials
    Guvendiren, Murat
    Dube, Koustubh
    Molde, Joseph
    Kohn, Joachim
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2016, 251