Source Apportionment of PM2.5 Using a CMB Model for a Centrally Located Indian City

被引:26
|
作者
Pipalatkar, Pradeep [1 ]
Khaparde, Vaishali V. [1 ]
Gajghate, Daulat G. [1 ]
Bawase, Mouktik A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Environm Engn Res Inst, Air Pollut Control Div, Nagpur 440020, Maharashtra, India
[2] Automot Res Assoc India, Automot Mat Lab, Pune 411038, Maharashtra, India
关键词
PM2.5; Metals; Anions-Cations; OC-EC; Source apportionment; CMB; DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS; PARTICULATE MATTER; AEROSOL EMISSIONS; ELEMENTAL CARBON; LOS-ANGELES; FINE; REFLECTANCE; MORTALITY; AIRBORNE;
D O I
10.4209/aaqr.2013.04.0130
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Samples of PM2.5 were collected sequentially for 24 hours during the last week of September to mid February 2009-10 at three locations representing residential (R), commercial (C) and industrial (I) sites in Nagpur city to determine their chemical composition and estimations of the sources contributing to them. Two receptor models were used for the source apportionment viz. enrichment factors (EF) to differentiate crustal and non-crustal sources, whereas chemical mass balance (CMB 8.2) was used to identify and quantify the major sources contributing to PM2.5. The ambient mass concentrations and chemical compositions of PM2.5 with respect to ionic species (Na+, NH4+, K+, Ca2+, F-, Cl-, NO3- and SO42-); carbonaceous species (organic and elemental carbon) and trace metals (Al, Ba, Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mg, Mn, Ni, Pb, Si and Zn) were determined. The most abundant chemical species were OC, EC, SO42-, NO3-, NH4+, K+ and trace metals (Al, Fe, Si, Mg, and Cu) at all the sites. Findings of EF showed the anthropogenic origin of Cd, Ni, Pb, Cu, Fe and Zn, whereas Ba, Cr, Mg, Mn, and Si were contributed from crustal sources. On the other hand, results of CMB using source profiles developed in India for non-vehicular and vehicular sources revealed that vehicular emissions were major contributing sources 57, 62 and 65%; followed by secondary inorganic aerosol 16, 12, 16%; biomass burning 15, 11, 9% and then by re-suspended dust 6,10, 7% at R, C and I sites, respectively. This study showed that while the sources at all three sites were mostly consistent, the percent contributions of these varied among the sites as per the intensity of ongoing activities at the receptor sites.
引用
收藏
页码:1089 / U1105
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Source apportionment of PM2.5 in Shenzhen based on receptor model with SOA tracer
    Su, Cui-Ping
    Sun, Yi-Fei
    Cao, Li-Ming
    Wang, Chuan
    Huang, Xiao-Feng
    He, Ling-Yan
    [J]. Zhongguo Huanjing Kexue/China Environmental Science, 2020, 40 (12): : 5124 - 5132
  • [42] Development of PM2.5 source impact spatial fields using a hybrid source apportionment air quality model
    Ivey, C. E.
    Holmes, H. A.
    Hu, Y. T.
    Mulholland, J. A.
    Russell, A. G.
    [J]. GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 8 (07) : 2153 - 2165
  • [43] Source apportionment of PM2.5 nitrate and sulfate in China using a source-oriented chemical transport model
    Zhang, Hongliang
    Li, Jingyi
    Ying, Qi
    Yu, Jian Zhen
    Wu, Dui
    Cheng, Yuan
    He, Kebin
    Jiang, Jingkun
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 62 : 228 - 242
  • [44] Source apportionment of PM2.5 across China using LOTOS-EUROS
    Timmermans, R.
    Kranenburg, R.
    Manders, A.
    Hendriks, C.
    Segers, A.
    Dammers, E.
    Zhang, Q.
    Wang, L.
    Liu, Z.
    Zeng, L.
    van der Gon, H. Denier
    Schaap, M.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 164 : 370 - 386
  • [45] Source apportionment of PM10 in Mumbai, India using CMB model
    Chelani, A. B.
    Gajghate, D. G.
    Devotta, S.
    [J]. BULLETIN OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION AND TOXICOLOGY, 2008, 81 (02) : 190 - 195
  • [46] Source apportionment of PM10 and PM2.5 in Milan (Italy) using receptor modelling
    Marcazzan, GM
    Ceriani, M
    Valli, G
    Vecchi, R
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 317 (1-3) : 137 - 147
  • [47] Speciation of ambient fine organic carbon particles and source apportionment of PM2.5 in Indian cities
    Chowdhury, Zohir
    Zheng, Mei
    Schauer, James J.
    Sheesley, Rebecca J.
    Salmon, Lynn G.
    Cass, Glen R.
    Russell, Armistead G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2007, 112 (D15)
  • [48] Source Apportionment of PM10 in Mumbai, India Using CMB Model
    A. B. Chelani
    D. G. Gajghate
    S. Devotta
    [J]. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 2008, 81 : 190 - 195
  • [49] Spatial and temporal characteristics of PM2.5 and source apportionment in Wuhan
    Hao, Hanzhou
    Guo, Qianqian
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (EEEP2017), 2018, 121
  • [50] Isotopic signatures and source apportionment of Pb in ambient PM2.5
    Jung, Chien-Cheng
    Chou, Charles C-K
    Huang, Yi-Tang
    Chang, Shih-Yu
    Lee, Chung-Te
    Lin, Chuan-Yao
    Cheung, Hing-Cho
    Kuo, Wei-Chen
    Chang, Chih-Wei
    Chang, Shuenn-Chin
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)