Source apportionment of PM2.5 in top polluted cities in Hebei, China using the CMAQ model

被引:103
|
作者
Wang, Litao [1 ,2 ]
Wei, Zhe [1 ]
Wei, Wei [3 ]
Fu, Joshua S. [2 ]
Meng, Chenchen [1 ]
Ma, Simeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Hebei Univ Engn, Sch City Construct, Dept Environm Engn, Handan 056038, Hebei, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Tennessee, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
[3] Beijing Univ Technol, Dept Environm Sci, Beijing 100124, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
PM2.5; Source apportionment; MM5-CMAQ; Hebei; Secondary aerosol; PARTICULATE MATTER; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; JANUARY; 2013; AIR-QUALITY; MESOSCALE MODEL; SOUTHERN HEBEI; EASTERN CHINA; HAZE EPISODE; NORTH CHINA; PART I;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.10.041
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Hebei has been recognized as one of the most polluted provinces in China, characterized by extremely high concentrations of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in many of its cities, especially those located in the southern area of the province and highly potentially northward transported to Beijing. Source apportionment of PM2.5 is the basis and prerequisite of an effective control strategy. In this study, the Mesoscale Modeling System Generation 5 (MM5) and the Models-3/Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system are applied to East Asia and North China at 36- and 12-km horizontal grid resolutions, and the source apportionment of PM2.5 in the three top polluted cities in Hebei, i.e., Shijiazhuang, Xingtai, and Handan, is performed using the Brute-Force method. It is concluded that the regional source contributions to PM2.5 are 27.9% in Shijiazhuang, 46.6% in Xingtai, and 40.4% in Handan. The major local contributors are industrial, domestic and agricultural sources in all the three cities with the contributions of 39.8%, 15.8%, and 10.6% in Shijiazhuang, 30.5%, 13.6%, and 6.9% in Xingtai, 35.9%, 13.5%, and 6.2% in Handan, respectively. As to the secondary aerosols of sulfate (SO42-), nitrate (NO3-), and ammonium (NH4+) in PM2.5, which are important chemical species in PM2.5 (about 30-40% in PM2.5) and cannot be further apportioned by receptor models, the regional source contributions to the total concentrations of SO42-, NO3-, and NH4+ are 40.9%, 62.0%, and 59.1% in Shijiazhuang, Xingtai, and Handan, respectively. The local industrial, domestic and agricultural contributions to those are 23.7%, 6.6%, and 29.8% in total in Shijiazhuang, 17.5%, 5.0%, and 17.7% in Xingtai, and 20.6%, 4.8%, and 17.8% in Handan, respectively. The regional joint controls of air pollution are more important in Xingtai and Handan than in Shijiazhuang, and the emission controls of agricultural sources need to be further considered in the future policy. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:723 / 736
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Source Apportionment of PM2.5 in Gyeongsan Using the PMF Model
    Jeong, YeongJin
    Hwang, InJo
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN SOCIETY FOR ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 31 (06) : 508 - 519
  • [2] The 2013 severe haze over the Southern Hebei, China: PM2.5 composition and source apportionment
    Wei, Zhe
    Wang, Li-Tao
    Chen, Ming-Zhang
    Zheng, Yan
    ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2014, 5 (04) : 759 - 768
  • [3] Characteristics and source apportionment of PM2.5 in Jiaxing, China
    Zhipeng Zhao
    Sheng Lv
    Yihua Zhang
    Qianbiao Zhao
    Lin Shen
    Shi Xu
    Jianqiang Yu
    Jingwen Hou
    Chengyu Jin
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2019, 26 : 7497 - 7511
  • [4] Source apportionment of PM2.5 and visibility in Jinan,China
    Mengtian Cheng
    Guiqian Tang
    Bo Lv
    Xingru Li
    Xinrui Wu
    Yiming Wang
    Yuesi Wang
    Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2021, (04) : 207 - 215
  • [5] Source apportionment of PM2.5 and visibility in Jinan, China
    Cheng, Mengtian
    Tang, Guiqian
    Lv, Bo
    Li, Xingru
    Wu, Xinrui
    Wang, Yiming
    Wang, Yuesi
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2021, 102 : 207 - 215
  • [6] Characteristics and source apportionment of PM2.5 in Jiaxing, China
    Zhao, Zhipeng
    Lv, Sheng
    Zhang, Yihua
    Zhao, Qianbiao
    Shen, Lin
    Xu, Shi
    Yu, Jianqiang
    Hou, Jingwen
    Jin, Chengyu
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2019, 26 (08) : 7497 - 7511
  • [7] Source Apportionment of PM2.5 in Delhi, India Using PMF Model
    S. K. Sharma
    T. K. Mandal
    Srishti Jain
    A. Saraswati
    Mohit Sharma
    Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 2016, 97 : 286 - 293
  • [8] PM2.5 Source Apportionment Using a Hybrid Environmental Receptor Model
    Chen, L-W Antony
    Cao, Junji
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 52 (11) : 6357 - 6369
  • [9] Source Apportionment of PM2.5 in Delhi, India Using PMF Model
    Sharma, S. K.
    Mandal, T. K.
    Jain, Srishti
    Saraswati
    Sharma, A.
    Saxena, Mohit
    BULLETIN OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION AND TOXICOLOGY, 2016, 97 (02) : 286 - 293
  • [10] Comparative source apportionment of ambient PM2.5 in two European cities
    Vallius, M
    Janssen, NAH
    Lanki, T
    deHartog, J
    Tiittanen, P
    Hoek, G
    Brunekreef, B
    Pekkanen, J
    EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 13 (04) : S237 - S237