Latent Factors in Student-Teacher Interaction Factor Analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Le, Thu [1 ]
Bolt, Daniel [2 ]
Camburn, Eric [3 ]
Goff, Peter [3 ]
Rohe, Karl [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Stat, 1300 Univ Ave, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Educ Psychol, 1025 W Johnson St, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Educ Leadership & Policy Anal, 1000 Bascom Mall, Madison, WI 53706 USA
关键词
achievement; individual differences; teacher characteristics; tracking; factor analysis; MATRIX COMPLETION; ACADEMIC-ACHIEVEMENT; SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS; GENDER; ENTRIES; RANK;
D O I
10.3102/1076998616676407
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Classroom interactions between students and teachers form a two-way or dyadic network. Measurements such as days absent, test scores, student ratings, or student grades can indicate the quality of the interaction. Together with the underlying bipartite graph, these values create a valued student-teacher dyadic interaction network. To study the broad structure of these values, we propose using interaction factor analysis (IFA), a recently developed statistical technique that can be used to investigate the hidden factors underlying the quality of student-teacher interactions. Our empirical study indicates there are latent teacher (i.e., teaching style) and student (i.e., preference for teaching style) types that influence the quality of interactions. Students and teachers of the same type tend to have more positive interactions, and those of differing types tend to have more negative interactions. IFA has the advantage of traditional factor analysis in that the types are not presupposed; instead, the types are identified by IFA and can be interpreted in post hoc analysis. Whereas traditional factor analysis requires one to observe all interactions, IFA performs well even when only a small fraction of potential interactions are actually observed.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 144
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] STUDENT-TEACHER INTERACTION
    WULFMAN, CE
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1972, 177 (4047) : 386 - &
  • [2] TRANSFERENCE - STUDENT-TEACHER INTERACTION
    HARGADON, BK
    [J]. SCHOOL REVIEW, 1966, 74 (04): : 446 - 452
  • [3] Emotion Analysis Platform to Investigate Student-Teacher Interaction
    Generosi, Andrea
    Ceccacci, Silvia
    D'Angelo, Ilaria
    Del Bianco, Noemi
    Cimini, Gianluca
    Mengoni, Maura
    Giaconi, Catia
    [J]. UNIVERSAL ACCESS IN HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION: USER AND CONTEXT DIVERSITY, UAHCI 2022, PT II, 2022, 13309 : 35 - 48
  • [4] EVALUATING STUDENT-TEACHER INTERACTION IN ENGLISH
    BUTLER, RJ
    KANTOR, KJ
    [J]. ENGLISH EDUCATION, 1979, 11 (01) : 32 - 40
  • [5] Developing an ethical basis for student-teacher interaction
    Wehrwein, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROFESSIONAL NURSING, 1996, 12 (05) : 297 - 302
  • [6] LIVE VERSUS VIDEOTAPED STUDENT-TEACHER INTERACTION
    TAYLOR, DR
    LIPSCOMB, E
    ROSEMIER, R
    [J]. AV COMMUNICATION REVIEW, 1969, 17 (01) : 47 - 51
  • [7] EFFECTS OF TEACHERS EXPECTANCY ON STUDENT-TEACHER INTERACTION
    ROTHBART, M
    DALFEN, S
    BARRETT, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1971, 62 (01) : 49 - &
  • [8] Supporting Student-Teacher Interaction Through a Chatbot
    Mendoza, Sonia
    Hernandez-Leon, Manuel
    Sanchez-Adame, Luis Martin
    Rodriguez, Jose
    Decouchant, Dominique
    Meneses-Viveros, Amilcar
    [J]. LEARNING AND COLLABORATION TECHNOLOGIES. HUMAN AND TECHNOLOGY ECOSYSTEMS, LCT 2020, PT II, 2020, 12206 : 93 - 107
  • [9] Expert golf instructors' student-teacher interaction patterns
    Schempp, P
    McCullick, B
    St Pierre, P
    Woorons, S
    You, J
    Clark, B
    [J]. RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT, 2004, 75 (01) : 60 - 70
  • [10] Classroom power relations: Understanding student-teacher interaction
    Tai, BHK
    [J]. HARVARD EDUCATIONAL REVIEW, 1998, 68 (03) : 426 - 436