Latent Factors in Student-Teacher Interaction Factor Analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Le, Thu [1 ]
Bolt, Daniel [2 ]
Camburn, Eric [3 ]
Goff, Peter [3 ]
Rohe, Karl [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Stat, 1300 Univ Ave, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Educ Psychol, 1025 W Johnson St, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Educ Leadership & Policy Anal, 1000 Bascom Mall, Madison, WI 53706 USA
关键词
achievement; individual differences; teacher characteristics; tracking; factor analysis; MATRIX COMPLETION; ACADEMIC-ACHIEVEMENT; SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS; GENDER; ENTRIES; RANK;
D O I
10.3102/1076998616676407
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Classroom interactions between students and teachers form a two-way or dyadic network. Measurements such as days absent, test scores, student ratings, or student grades can indicate the quality of the interaction. Together with the underlying bipartite graph, these values create a valued student-teacher dyadic interaction network. To study the broad structure of these values, we propose using interaction factor analysis (IFA), a recently developed statistical technique that can be used to investigate the hidden factors underlying the quality of student-teacher interactions. Our empirical study indicates there are latent teacher (i.e., teaching style) and student (i.e., preference for teaching style) types that influence the quality of interactions. Students and teachers of the same type tend to have more positive interactions, and those of differing types tend to have more negative interactions. IFA has the advantage of traditional factor analysis in that the types are not presupposed; instead, the types are identified by IFA and can be interpreted in post hoc analysis. Whereas traditional factor analysis requires one to observe all interactions, IFA performs well even when only a small fraction of potential interactions are actually observed.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 144
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Classroom power relations. Understanding student-teacher interaction
    Ivinson, G
    [J]. BRITISH EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2000, 26 (02) : 293 - 294
  • [22] Student-Teacher Interaction on Facebook: What Students Find Appropriate
    Teclehaimanot, Berhane
    Hickman, Torey
    [J]. TECHTRENDS, 2011, 55 (03) : 19 - 30
  • [23] A REVIEW OF A STUDENT-TEACHER INTERACTION IN ONLINE LEARNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION
    Uotinen, S.
    Tyrvainen, H.
    Valkonen, L.
    [J]. INTED2016: 10TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE, 2016, : 7096 - 7096
  • [24] EDUCATION FOR SLOW-LEARNERS - STUDENT-TEACHER INTERACTION PROCESS
    COCHRAN, MM
    [J]. SOCIOLOGICAL FOCUS, 1973, 6 (03) : 100 - 110
  • [25] PUPILS EXPECTATIONS OF STUDENT-TEACHER
    CAMERONJ.M
    MCDADE, DF
    [J]. DURHAM RESEARCH REVIEW, 1972, 6 (29): : 695 - 700
  • [26] SURVEY OF STUDENT-TEACHER RELATIONSHIPS
    Michael, William B.
    Herrold, Earle E.
    Cryan, Eugene W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 1951, 44 (09): : 657 - 673
  • [27] EVALUATING STUDENT-TEACHER EXPERIENCES
    Inlow, Gail M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 1952, 45 (09): : 705 - 714
  • [28] Teacher, Learner and Student-Teacher Identity in TESOL
    Richards, Jack C.
    [J]. RELC JOURNAL, 2023, 54 (01) : 252 - 266
  • [29] RECIPROCAL STUDENT-TEACHER QUESTIONING
    HELFELDT, JP
    LALIK, R
    [J]. READING TEACHER, 1976, 30 (03): : 283 - 287
  • [30] A STUDY OF STUDENT-TEACHER RELATIONSHIPS
    Bush, Robert Nelson
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 1942, 35 (09): : 645 - 656