Survival Following Detection of Stage I Lung Cancer by Screening in the National Lung Screening Trial

被引:19
|
作者
Gierada, David S. [1 ]
Pinsky, Paul F. [2 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Mallinckrodt Inst Radiol, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] NCI, Canc Prevent Div, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
关键词
early detection cancer; imaging; lung cancer;
D O I
10.1016/j.chest.2020.08.2048
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: There is limited information about survival of stage I lung cancer diagnosed by screening. RESEARCH QUESTION: What was the survival rate of screen-detected stage I lung cancer in the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST), and was it affected by screening method, patient or tumor characteristics, or treatment method? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The study cohort consisted of all NLST participants with screen-detected stage I lung cancer. Lung cancer-specific survival for stage I overall and for IA and IB substages were compared in the low-dose CT and chest radiography (CXR) screening randomization arms and with an analogous cohort from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program of the National Cancer Institute; the cumulative incidence competing risk method was used for analysis. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the association between lung cancer-specific survival and screening arm, patient factors, primary tumor size, and treatment. RESULTS: There were 324 screen-detected stage I lung cancers in the low-dose CT arm and 125 in the CXR arm. The 10-year survival in the low-dose CT arm was greater than in the CXR arm (73.4% vs 64.6%; P =.05), and both were greater than in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cohort (55.6%; P <.001 vs low-dose CT arm, P =.04 vs CXR arm). Proportional hazards models revealed a greater likelihood of survival in the low-dose CT arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.5-0.98) and with primary tumor size below the median of 17 mm (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.42-0.88). There was no survival difference between treatment with limited resection vs full resection (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.6-1.9), whereas nonsurgical treatment was associated with a reduced likelihood of survival compared with full resection (HR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.6-6.0). INTERPRETATION: Long-term lung cancer-specific survival of stage I lung cancer was greater with low-dose CT imaging than with CXR screening or in the general population, for smaller primary tumor size, and with surgical treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:862 / 869
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Screening for early stage lung cancer and its correlation with lung nodule detection
    Qian, Fangfei
    Yang, Wenjia
    Chen, Qunhui
    Zhang, Xueyan
    Han, Baohui
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2018, 10 : S846 - S859
  • [42] The National Lung Cancer Screening Trial: The Ripple Effect Begins?
    Whitson, Bryan A.
    D'Cunha, Jonathan
    SEMINARS IN THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2010, 22 (04) : 274 - 275
  • [43] Uneven Distribution of Cancer Histology in the National Lung Screening Trial
    Dillard, Thomas A.
    Patel, Raxit R.
    Schroeder, Carsten
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2015, 350 (03): : 219 - 221
  • [44] Cancer Risk in Subsolid Nodules in the National Lung Screening Trial
    Hammer, Mark M.
    Palazzo, Lauren L.
    Kong, Chung Yin
    Hunsaker, Andetta R.
    RADIOLOGY, 2019, 293 (02) : 441 - 448
  • [45] Outcomes From a Minority-Based Lung Cancer Screening Program vs the National Lung Screening Trial
    Pasquinelli, Mary M.
    Kovitz, Kevin L.
    Koshy, Matthew
    Menchaca, Martha G.
    Liu, Li
    Winn, Robert
    Feldman, Lawrence E.
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2018, 4 (09) : 1291 - 1293
  • [46] Factors Associated With Smoking Cessation Attempts in Lung Cancer Screening A Secondary Analysis of the National Lung Screening Trial
    Thomas, Nina A.
    Ward, Ralph
    Tanner, Nichole T.
    Rojewski, Alana M.
    Toll, Benjamin
    Gebregziabher, Mulugeta
    Silvestri, Gerard A.
    CHEST, 2023, 163 (02) : 433 - 443
  • [47] Effect of screening CT results and features on lung cancer risk prediction within the National Lung Screening Trial
    Robbins, Hilary A.
    Berg, Christine D.
    Cheung, Li C.
    Chaturvedi, Anil K.
    Katki, Hormuzd A.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 77
  • [48] Microsimulation modeling of extended annual CT screening among lung cancer cases in the National Lung Screening Trial
    Schreuder, Anton
    Mets, Onno M.
    Schaefer-Prokop, Cornelia M.
    Jacobs, Colin
    Prokop, Mathias
    LUNG CANCER, 2021, 156 : 5 - 11
  • [49] Lung cancer survival and comorbidities in lung cancer screening participants of the Gdansk screening cohort
    Ostrowski, Marcin
    Marczyk, Michal
    Dziedzic, Robert
    Jelitto-Gorska, Malgorzata
    Marjanski, Tomasz
    Pisiak, Sylwia
    Jedrzejczyk, Tadeusz
    Polanska, Joanna
    Zdrojewski, Tomasz
    Wojtyniak, Bogdan
    Rzyman, Witold
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 29 (06): : 1114 - 1117
  • [50] CT SCREENING FOR LUNG CANCER: DEFINITION OF POSITIVE TEST RESULT IN THE NATIONAL LUNG SCREENING TRIAL CT COHORT COMPARED WITH I-ELCAP
    Yip, Rowena
    Yankelevitz, David F.
    Henschke, Claudia I.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2013, 8 : S326 - S326