Survival Following Detection of Stage I Lung Cancer by Screening in the National Lung Screening Trial

被引:19
|
作者
Gierada, David S. [1 ]
Pinsky, Paul F. [2 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Mallinckrodt Inst Radiol, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] NCI, Canc Prevent Div, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
关键词
early detection cancer; imaging; lung cancer;
D O I
10.1016/j.chest.2020.08.2048
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: There is limited information about survival of stage I lung cancer diagnosed by screening. RESEARCH QUESTION: What was the survival rate of screen-detected stage I lung cancer in the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST), and was it affected by screening method, patient or tumor characteristics, or treatment method? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The study cohort consisted of all NLST participants with screen-detected stage I lung cancer. Lung cancer-specific survival for stage I overall and for IA and IB substages were compared in the low-dose CT and chest radiography (CXR) screening randomization arms and with an analogous cohort from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program of the National Cancer Institute; the cumulative incidence competing risk method was used for analysis. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the association between lung cancer-specific survival and screening arm, patient factors, primary tumor size, and treatment. RESULTS: There were 324 screen-detected stage I lung cancers in the low-dose CT arm and 125 in the CXR arm. The 10-year survival in the low-dose CT arm was greater than in the CXR arm (73.4% vs 64.6%; P =.05), and both were greater than in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cohort (55.6%; P <.001 vs low-dose CT arm, P =.04 vs CXR arm). Proportional hazards models revealed a greater likelihood of survival in the low-dose CT arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.5-0.98) and with primary tumor size below the median of 17 mm (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.42-0.88). There was no survival difference between treatment with limited resection vs full resection (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.6-1.9), whereas nonsurgical treatment was associated with a reduced likelihood of survival compared with full resection (HR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.6-6.0). INTERPRETATION: Long-term lung cancer-specific survival of stage I lung cancer was greater with low-dose CT imaging than with CXR screening or in the general population, for smaller primary tumor size, and with surgical treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:862 / 869
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Characterizing Screen-Detected Small Cell Lung Cancer in a Lung Cancer Screening Program and in the National Lung Screening Trial
    Ruane, B. M.
    Shusted, C. S.
    Muse, E.
    Emeigh-McBride, L.
    Jackson, B.
    Kane, G. C.
    Evans, N. R., III
    McIntire, R.
    Zeigler-Johnson, C.
    Juon, H.
    Barta, J. A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2022, 205
  • [22] Computed Tomography Screening for Lung Cancer: Has It Finally Arrived? Implications of the National Lung Screening Trial
    Aberle, Denise R.
    Abtin, Fereidoun
    Brown, Kathleen
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (08) : 1002 - 1008
  • [23] Moving Beyond the National Lung Screening Trial: Discussing Strategies for Implementation of Lung Cancer Screening Programs
    Goulart, Bernardo H. L.
    Ramsey, Scott D.
    ONCOLOGIST, 2013, 18 (08): : 941 - 946
  • [24] Gender, Competing Deaths and Outcomes from Lung Cancer Screening in the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST)
    Young, R. P.
    Scott, R. J.
    Gamble, G. D.
    Silvestri, G. A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 201
  • [25] Computed Tomography Screening for Lung Cancer in the National Lung Screening Trial A Cost-effectiveness Analysis
    Black, William C.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC IMAGING, 2015, 30 (02) : 79 - 87
  • [26] Effect Of Screening CT Findings On Lung Cancer Risk Prediction Within The National Lung Screening Trial
    Robbins, H. A.
    Berg, C.
    Cheung, L. C.
    Chaturvedi, A.
    Katki, H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2017, 195
  • [27] Economic, legal, and ethical rationales for the ACRIN National Lung Screening Trial of CT screening for lung cancer
    Hillman, BJ
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2003, 10 (03) : 349 - 350
  • [28] Lung Cancer Screening With Low-Dose Computed Tomography Beyond the National Lung Screening Trial
    Jacobson, Francine L.
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2015, 107 (11):
  • [29] Incidence Lung Cancer after a Negative CT Screening in the National Lung Screening Trial: Deep Learning-Based Detection of Missed Lung Cancers
    Cho, Jungheum
    Kim, Jihang
    Lee, Kyong Joon
    Nam, Chang Mo
    Yoon, Sung Hyun
    Song, Hwayoung
    Kim, Junghoon
    Choi, Ye Ra
    Lee, Kyung Hee
    Lee, Kyung Won
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (12) : 1 - 9
  • [30] Image quality assurance in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian cancer screening trial network of the National Lung Screening Trial
    Moore, SM
    Gierada, DS
    Clark, KW
    Blaine, J
    JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2005, 18 (03) : 242 - 250