Trends in Utilization of Robotic and Open Partial Nephrectomy for Management of cT1 Renal Masses

被引:46
|
作者
Alameddine, Mahmoud [1 ]
Koru-Sengul, Tulay [2 ,3 ]
Moore, Kevin J. [2 ]
Miao, Feng [3 ]
Savio, Luis Felipe [1 ]
Nahar, Bruno [1 ]
Prakash, Nachiketh Soodana [1 ]
Venkatramani, Vivek [1 ]
Jue, Joshua S. [1 ]
Punnen, Sanoj [1 ,3 ]
Parekh, Dipen J. [1 ,3 ]
Ritch, Chad R. [1 ,3 ]
Gonzalgo, Mark L. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Dept Urol, 1120 NW 14th St, Miami, FL 33136 USA
[2] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Miami, FL 33136 USA
[3] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Sylvester Comprehens Canc Ctr, Miami, FL 33136 USA
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS | 2019年 / 5卷 / 03期
关键词
Nephrectomy; Robotic surgical procedure; Kidney neoplasm; Healthcare disparities; Trends; RACIAL DISPARITIES; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; CANCER; CARE; SURGERY; QUALITY; ACCESS; TUMORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.euf.2017.12.006
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Partial nephrectomy is widely used for surgical management of small renal masses. Use of robotic (RPN) versus open partial nephrectomy (OPN) among various populations is not well characterized. Objective: To analyze trends in utilization of RPN and disparities that may be associated with this procedure for management of cT1 renal masses in the USA. Design, setting, and participants: Patients who underwent RPN or OPN for clinical stage T1N0M0 renal masses in the USA from 2010 to 2013 were identified in the National Cancer Data Base. A total of 23 154 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate differences in receiving RPN or OPN across various patient groups. Results and limitations: Utilization of RPN increased from 41% in 2010 to 63% in 2013. Black patients (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-0.98) and Hispanic patients (aOR 0.85, 95% CI 0.77-0.95) were less likely to undergo RPN. RPN was less likely to be performed in rural counties (aOR 0.80, 95% CI 0.66-0.98) and in patients with no insurance (aOR 0.52, 95% CI 0.44-0.61) or patients covered by Medicaid (aOR 0.81, 95% CI 0.73-0.90). There was no significant difference in RPN utilization between academic and non-academic facilities. Patients with higher clinical stage (aOR 0.58, 95% CI 0.55-0.62) and comorbidities (aOR 0.79, 95% CI 0.71-0.88) were also less likely to undergo RPN. Conclusions: Utilization of RPN has continued to increase over time; however, there are significant disparities in its utilization according to race and socioeconomic status. Black and Hispanic patients and patients in rural communities and with limited insurance were more likely to be treated with OPN instead of RPN. Patient summary: The use of robotic surgery in partial nephrectomy for management of small renal masses has increased over time. We found a significant disparity across different racial and socioeconomic groups in use of robotic partial nephrectomy compared to open surgery. Patients living in rural areas, with limited insurance, and multiple medical comorbidities were more likely to undergo open than robotic partial nephrectomy. (c) 2017 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:482 / 487
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] UTILIZATION OF ROBOTIC VERSUS OPEN PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY FOR MANAGEMENT OF CT1 AND CT2 RENAL MASSES
    Alameddine, Mahmoud
    Koru-Sengul, Tulay
    Miao, Feng
    Savio, Luis Felipe
    Zheng, Ian
    Venkatramani, Vivek
    Prakash, Nachiketh Soodana
    Jue, Joshua S.
    Nahar, Bruno
    Ritch, Chad
    Punnen, Sanoj
    Parekh, Dipen J.
    Gonzalgo, Mark L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E1275 - E1275
  • [2] Comparison of Partial Nephrectomy and Percutaneous Ablation for cT1 Renal Masses
    Thompson, R. Houston
    Atwell, Tom
    Schmit, Grant
    Lohse, Christine M.
    Kurup, A. Nicholas
    Weisbrod, Adam
    Psutka, Sarah P.
    Stewart, Suzanne B.
    Callstrom, Matthew R.
    Cheville, John C.
    Boorjian, Stephen A.
    Leibovich, Bradley C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 67 (02) : 252 - 259
  • [3] Re: Comparison of Partial Nephrectomy and Percutaneous Ablation for cT1 Renal Masses
    Kordan, Yakup
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGICAL SURGERY, 2015, 2 (01): : 45 - 45
  • [4] Oncologic Outcomes Following Partial Nephrectomy and Percutaneous Ablation for cT1 Renal Masses
    Andrews, Jack R.
    Atwell, Thomas
    Schmit, Grant
    Lohse, Christine M.
    Kurup, A. Nicholas
    Weisbrod, Adam
    Callstrom, Matthew R.
    Cheville, John C.
    Boorjian, Stephen A.
    Leibovich, Bradley C.
    Thompson, R. Houston
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2019, 76 (02) : 244 - 251
  • [5] Analyzing National Incidences and Predictors of Open Conversion During Minimally Invasive Partial Nephrectomy for cT1 Renal Masses
    Klein, Geraldine
    Wang, Hanzhang
    Elshabrawy, Ahmed
    Nashawi, Mouhamed
    Gourley, Eric
    Liss, Michael
    Kaushik, Dharam
    Wu, Shenghui
    Rodriguez, Ronald
    Mansour, Ahmed M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2021, 35 (01) : 30 - 38
  • [6] Re: Comparison of Partial Nephrectomy and Percutaneous Ablation for cT1 Renal Masses Editorial Comment
    Laguna, M. Pilar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 194 (02): : 331 - 331
  • [7] Re: Oncologic Outcomes following Partial Nephrectomy and Percutaneous Ablation for cT1 Renal Masses
    Laguna, M. Pilar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 (01): : 27 - 28
  • [8] Open Partial Nephrectomy in the Management of Small Renal Masses
    Kirkali, Ziya
    Canda, A. Erdem
    [J]. ADVANCES IN UROLOGY, 2008, 2008
  • [9] Robotic assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for incidental renal masses: Comparison to open partial nephrectomy
    Michli, Eddie
    Parra, Raul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (04): : 213 - 214
  • [10] PERCUTANEOUS ABLATION OFFERS COMPARABLE ONCOLOGIC CONTROL COMPARED WITH PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY FOR CT1 RENAL MASSES
    Andrews, Jack
    Atwell, Tom
    Schmit, Grant
    Lohse, Christine
    Kurup, Nicholas
    Weisbrod, Adam
    Callstrom, Matthew
    Cheville, John
    Boorjian, Stephen
    Leibovich, Bradley
    Thompson, R. Houston
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (04): : E918 - E918