Trends in Utilization of Robotic and Open Partial Nephrectomy for Management of cT1 Renal Masses

被引:46
|
作者
Alameddine, Mahmoud [1 ]
Koru-Sengul, Tulay [2 ,3 ]
Moore, Kevin J. [2 ]
Miao, Feng [3 ]
Savio, Luis Felipe [1 ]
Nahar, Bruno [1 ]
Prakash, Nachiketh Soodana [1 ]
Venkatramani, Vivek [1 ]
Jue, Joshua S. [1 ]
Punnen, Sanoj [1 ,3 ]
Parekh, Dipen J. [1 ,3 ]
Ritch, Chad R. [1 ,3 ]
Gonzalgo, Mark L. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Dept Urol, 1120 NW 14th St, Miami, FL 33136 USA
[2] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Miami, FL 33136 USA
[3] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Sylvester Comprehens Canc Ctr, Miami, FL 33136 USA
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS | 2019年 / 5卷 / 03期
关键词
Nephrectomy; Robotic surgical procedure; Kidney neoplasm; Healthcare disparities; Trends; RACIAL DISPARITIES; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; CANCER; CARE; SURGERY; QUALITY; ACCESS; TUMORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.euf.2017.12.006
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Partial nephrectomy is widely used for surgical management of small renal masses. Use of robotic (RPN) versus open partial nephrectomy (OPN) among various populations is not well characterized. Objective: To analyze trends in utilization of RPN and disparities that may be associated with this procedure for management of cT1 renal masses in the USA. Design, setting, and participants: Patients who underwent RPN or OPN for clinical stage T1N0M0 renal masses in the USA from 2010 to 2013 were identified in the National Cancer Data Base. A total of 23 154 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate differences in receiving RPN or OPN across various patient groups. Results and limitations: Utilization of RPN increased from 41% in 2010 to 63% in 2013. Black patients (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-0.98) and Hispanic patients (aOR 0.85, 95% CI 0.77-0.95) were less likely to undergo RPN. RPN was less likely to be performed in rural counties (aOR 0.80, 95% CI 0.66-0.98) and in patients with no insurance (aOR 0.52, 95% CI 0.44-0.61) or patients covered by Medicaid (aOR 0.81, 95% CI 0.73-0.90). There was no significant difference in RPN utilization between academic and non-academic facilities. Patients with higher clinical stage (aOR 0.58, 95% CI 0.55-0.62) and comorbidities (aOR 0.79, 95% CI 0.71-0.88) were also less likely to undergo RPN. Conclusions: Utilization of RPN has continued to increase over time; however, there are significant disparities in its utilization according to race and socioeconomic status. Black and Hispanic patients and patients in rural communities and with limited insurance were more likely to be treated with OPN instead of RPN. Patient summary: The use of robotic surgery in partial nephrectomy for management of small renal masses has increased over time. We found a significant disparity across different racial and socioeconomic groups in use of robotic partial nephrectomy compared to open surgery. Patients living in rural areas, with limited insurance, and multiple medical comorbidities were more likely to undergo open than robotic partial nephrectomy. (c) 2017 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:482 / 487
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Outcomes of Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Masses With Nephrometry Score of ≥ 7
    White, Michael A.
    Haber, Georges-Pascal
    Autorino, Riccardo
    Khanna, Rakesh
    Hernandez, Adrian V.
    Forest, Sylvain
    Yang, Bo
    Altunrende, Fatih
    Stein, Robert J.
    Kaouk, Jihad H.
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2011, 77 (04) : 809 - 813
  • [42] IDENTIFYING THE OPTIMAL WARM ISCHEMIA TIME CUT-OFF DURING ROBOT-ASSISTED PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY FOR CT1 RENAL MASSES
    Nocera, Luigi
    Mottaran, Angelo
    Bravi, Carlo
    Piro, Adele
    Sarchi, Luca
    Paciotti, Marco
    Lores, Maria Peraire
    Balestrazzi, Eleonora
    Piramide, Federico
    De Groote, Ruben
    De Naeyer, Geert
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 209 : E799 - E800
  • [43] CURRENT TRENDS AND DISPARITIES IN USE OF PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY FOR T1A RENAL MASSES
    May, Allison
    Guduru, Anirudh
    Syed, Johar
    Davaro, Facundo
    Siddiqui, Sameer
    Hamilton, Zachary
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (04): : E522 - E522
  • [44] WHICH PATIENT AND TUMOR FACTORS MAKE RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY APPROPRIATE TREATMENT FOR SUSPICIOUS CT1 RENAL MASSES?
    Semerjian, Alice
    Matthew, Fischer
    Johnson, Anna
    Noyes, Sabrina
    Qi, Ji
    Hafron, Jason
    Johnston, William
    Maatman, Thomas
    Patel, Amit
    Siefman, Brian
    Rogers, Craig
    Lane, Brian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 206 : E779 - E780
  • [45] Evaluation of national trends in the utilization of partial nephrectomy in relation to the publication of the American Urologic Association guidelines for the management of clinical T1 renal masses
    Michael A Liss
    Song Wang
    Kerrin Palazzi
    Ramzi Jabaji
    Nishant Patel
    Hak J Lee
    J Kellogg Parsons
    Ithaar H Derweesh
    [J]. BMC Urology, 14
  • [46] Evaluation of national trends in the utilization of partial nephrectomy in relation to the publication of the American Urologic Association guidelines for the management of clinical T1 renal masses
    Liss, Michael A.
    Wang, Song
    Palazzi, Kerrin
    Jabaji, Ramzi
    Patel, Nishant
    Lee, Hak J.
    Parsons, J. Kellogg
    Derweesh, Ithaar H.
    [J]. BMC UROLOGY, 2014, 14
  • [47] Robotic versus open partial nephrectomy for highly complex renal masses: Comparison of perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes
    Garisto, Juan
    Bertolo, Riccardo
    Dagenais, Julien
    Sagalovich, Daniel
    Fareed, Khaled
    Fergany, Amr
    Stein, Robert
    Kaouk, Jihad
    [J]. UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2018, 36 (10) : 471.e1 - 471.e9
  • [48] Management of renal masses during pregnancy: the role of partial nephrectomy
    Yates, J. K.
    King, N.
    Alter, R.
    Lombardo, S.
    Munver, R.
    Jain, S.
    Sawczuk, I.
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 109 : 14 - 14
  • [49] Complex renal masses: partial or no partial nephrectomy?
    Lombardo, Riccardo
    Leonardo, Costantino
    Zarraonandia, Anton
    Tubaro, Andrea
    De Nunzio, Cosimo
    [J]. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2019, 7
  • [50] OUTCOMES OF ROBOTIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY FOR COMPLEX RENAL MASSES WITH A NEPHROMETRY SCORE ≥ 7
    White, M. A.
    Haber, G. P.
    Autorino, R.
    Khanna, R.
    Forest, S.
    Altunrende, F.
    Yang, B.
    Kaouk, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2010, 24 : A237 - A238