Comparison of Partial Nephrectomy and Percutaneous Ablation for cT1 Renal Masses

被引:318
|
作者
Thompson, R. Houston [1 ,2 ]
Atwell, Tom [2 ,3 ]
Schmit, Grant [2 ,3 ]
Lohse, Christine M. [2 ,4 ]
Kurup, A. Nicholas [2 ,3 ]
Weisbrod, Adam [2 ,3 ]
Psutka, Sarah P. [1 ,2 ]
Stewart, Suzanne B. [1 ,2 ]
Callstrom, Matthew R. [2 ,3 ]
Cheville, John C. [2 ,5 ]
Boorjian, Stephen A. [1 ,2 ]
Leibovich, Bradley C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Urol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Mayo Med Sch, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Dept Radiol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Dept Hlth Sci, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[5] Mayo Clin, Dept Pathol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
Kidney neoplasms; Partial nephrectomy; Cryosurgery; Ablation techniques; RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; CELL CARCINOMA; RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY; ONCOLOGIC OUTCOMES; LAPAROSCOPIC CRYOABLATION; THERMAL ABLATION; FOLLOW-UP; TUMORS; EXPERIENCE; KIDNEY;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2014.07.021
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Partial nephrectomy (PN) is a preferred treatment for cT1 renal masses, whereas thermal ablation represents an alternative nephron-sparing option, albeit with higher reported rates of recurrence. Objective: To review our experience with PN, percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and percutaneous cryoablation for cT1 renal masses. Design, setting, and participants: A total of 1803 patients with primary cT1N0M0 renal masses treated between 2000 and 2011 were identified from the prospectively maintained Mayo Clinic Renal Tumor Registry. Intervention: PN compared with percutaneous ablation. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Local recurrence-free, metastases-free, and overall survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with log-rank tests. Results and limitations: Of the 1424 cT1a patients, 1057 underwent PN, 180 underwent RFA, and 187 underwent cryoablation. In this cohort, local recurrence-free survival was similar among the three treatments (p = 0.49), whereas metastases-free survival was significantly better after PN (p = 0.005) and cryoablation (p = 0.021) when compared with RFA. Of the 379 cT1b patients, 326 patients underwent PN, and 53 patients were managed with cryoablation (8 RFA patients were excluded). In this cohort, local recurrence-free survival (p = 0.81) and metastases-free survival (p = 0.45) were similar between PN and cryoablation. In both the cT1a and cT1b groups, PN patients were significantly younger, with lower Charlson scores and had superior overall survival (p < 0.001 for all). Limitations include retrospective review and selection bias. Conclusions: In a large cohort of sporadic cT1 renal masses, we observed that recurrence-free survival was similar for PN and percutaneous ablation patients. Metastases-free survival was superior for PN and cryoablation patients when compared with RFA for cT1a patients. Overall survival was superior after PN, likely because of selection bias. If these results were validated, an update to clinical guidelines would be warranted. Patient summary: Partial nephrectomy and percutaneous ablation for small (<7-cm) and localized renal masses are associated with similar rates of local recurrence. (C) 2014 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:252 / 259
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Re: Comparison of Partial Nephrectomy and Percutaneous Ablation for cT1 Renal Masses
    Kordan, Yakup
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGICAL SURGERY, 2015, 2 (01): : 45 - 45
  • [2] Re: Comparison of Partial Nephrectomy and Percutaneous Ablation for cT1 Renal Masses Editorial Comment
    Laguna, M. Pilar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 194 (02): : 331 - 331
  • [3] Oncologic Outcomes Following Partial Nephrectomy and Percutaneous Ablation for cT1 Renal Masses
    Andrews, Jack R.
    Atwell, Thomas
    Schmit, Grant
    Lohse, Christine M.
    Kurup, A. Nicholas
    Weisbrod, Adam
    Callstrom, Matthew R.
    Cheville, John C.
    Boorjian, Stephen A.
    Leibovich, Bradley C.
    Thompson, R. Houston
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2019, 76 (02) : 244 - 251
  • [4] Re: Oncologic Outcomes following Partial Nephrectomy and Percutaneous Ablation for cT1 Renal Masses
    Laguna, M. Pilar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 (01): : 27 - 28
  • [5] PERCUTANEOUS ABLATION OFFERS COMPARABLE ONCOLOGIC CONTROL COMPARED WITH PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY FOR CT1 RENAL MASSES
    Andrews, Jack
    Atwell, Tom
    Schmit, Grant
    Lohse, Christine
    Kurup, Nicholas
    Weisbrod, Adam
    Callstrom, Matthew
    Cheville, John
    Boorjian, Stephen
    Leibovich, Bradley
    Thompson, R. Houston
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (04): : E918 - E918
  • [6] Comparison of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy and percutaneous ablation for ct1 renal masses: Mid term outcome analysis
    Carbonara, U.
    Beksac, A. T.
    Larcher, A.
    Basile, G.
    Crocerossa, F.
    Celia, A.
    Montorsi, F.
    Derweesh, I.
    Capitanio, U.
    Kaouk, J. K.
    Autorino, R.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2021, 79 : S766 - S766
  • [7] COMPARISON OF ROBOT-ASSISTED PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY AND PERCUTANEOUS ABLATION FOR CT1 RENAL MASSES: MID TERM OUTCOME ANALYSIS
    Carbonara, Umberto
    Beksac, Alp Tuna
    Larcher, Alessandro
    Crocerossa, Fabio
    Hampton, Lance
    Derweesh, Ithaar
    Capitanio, Umberto
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Kaouk, Jihad
    Autorino, Riccardo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 206 : E882 - E882
  • [8] Trends in Utilization of Robotic and Open Partial Nephrectomy for Management of cT1 Renal Masses
    Alameddine, Mahmoud
    Koru-Sengul, Tulay
    Moore, Kevin J.
    Miao, Feng
    Savio, Luis Felipe
    Nahar, Bruno
    Prakash, Nachiketh Soodana
    Venkatramani, Vivek
    Jue, Joshua S.
    Punnen, Sanoj
    Parekh, Dipen J.
    Ritch, Chad R.
    Gonzalgo, Mark L.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2019, 5 (03): : 482 - 487
  • [9] LONG TERM TRIFECTA OUTCOMES OF PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY VERSUS PERCUTANEOUS ABLATION IN CT1A RENAL MASSES
    Covin, Bertrand
    Benoit, Thibaut
    Delchier, Marie Charlotte
    Lagarde, Severine
    Roumiguie, Mathieu
    Doumerc, Nicolas
    Thoulouzan, Matthieu
    Huyghe, Eric
    Game, Xavier
    Soulie, Michel
    Beauval, Jean Baptiste
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (04): : E610 - E610
  • [10] UTILIZATION OF ROBOTIC VERSUS OPEN PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY FOR MANAGEMENT OF CT1 AND CT2 RENAL MASSES
    Alameddine, Mahmoud
    Koru-Sengul, Tulay
    Miao, Feng
    Savio, Luis Felipe
    Zheng, Ian
    Venkatramani, Vivek
    Prakash, Nachiketh Soodana
    Jue, Joshua S.
    Nahar, Bruno
    Ritch, Chad
    Punnen, Sanoj
    Parekh, Dipen J.
    Gonzalgo, Mark L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E1275 - E1275