Adolescent indirect reciprocity: Evidence from incentivized economic paradigms

被引:3
|
作者
Hu, Yang [1 ]
Ma, Jichang [1 ]
Luan, Ziyan [2 ]
Dubas, Judith Semon [2 ]
Xi, Juzhe [3 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Sch Psychol & Cognit Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Utrecht, Dept Dev Psychol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] East China Normal Univ, Sch Psychol & Cognit Sci, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
adolescents; Indirect reciprocity; Fairness; Strangers; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; 3RD-PARTY PUNISHMENT; EVOLUTION; BEHAVIOR; ADULTHOOD; IDENTITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.06.010
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Introduction: Indirect reciprocity serves as a crucial component of how we interact with strangers. Two types of indirect reciprocity can be distinguished: pay-it-forward reciprocity and third party reciprocity. Pay-it-forward reciprocity refers to behaviors where people who have been treated well by others (either fairly or generously), extend that fairness or generosity to a stranger. Third-party reciprocity refers to behaviors where third-party bystanders altruistically punish those who transgress against others or kindly help the victims. The expansion of adolescents' social world increases opportunities to exercise indirect reciprocity yet very little research has focused on this topic in this age group. The current research addresses this lacuna and investigates how younger adolescents differ from older adolescents in pay-it-forward and third party reciprocity. Methods: With incentivized economic paradigms, we investigated both types of indirect reciprocity in younger (n = 50) and older adolescents (n = 46). Results: The pay-it-forward task revealed that receiving an equal (vs. unequal) distribution led both younger and older adolescents to become fairer to a third person. In the third-party task, older adolescents were more likely to devote their own resources to enforce fairness norms than younger adolescents. Conclusion: Our results shed light on how adolescents perceive and act in complex social settings where direct reciprocity is unrealistic. Both younger and older adolescents are capable of engaging in both forms of indirect reciprocity with older adolescents being more discriminative in their norm-enforcing behaviors.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 228
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evidence of direct and indirect reciprocity in network-structured economic games
    Daniel Redhead
    Matthew Gervais
    Kotrina Kajokaite
    Jeremy Koster
    Arlenys Hurtado Manyoma
    Danier Hurtado Manyoma
    Richard McElreath
    Cody T. Ross
    [J]. Communications Psychology, 2 (1):
  • [2] Indirect reciprocity and tradeoff paradigms in the wake of violent intergroup conflict
    Skoog, Eric
    [J]. EVOLUTION AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2021, 42 (03) : 230 - 238
  • [3] Indirect Reciprocity and Prosocial Behaviour: Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment
    Mujcic, Redzo
    Leibbrandt, Andreas
    [J]. ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2018, 128 (611): : 1683 - 1699
  • [4] Indirect Reciprocity and Charitable Giving-Evidence from a Field Experiment
    Khadjavi, Menusch
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2017, 63 (11) : 3708 - 3717
  • [5] Selective Cooperation in the SupermarketField Experimental Evidence for Indirect Reciprocity
    Florian Lange
    Frank Eggert
    [J]. Human Nature, 2015, 26 : 392 - 400
  • [6] The impact of honey fraud information on the valuation of honey origin: Evidence from an incentivized economic experiment
    Gustafson, Christopher R.
    Champetier, Antoine
    Tuyizere, Olivier
    Gitungwa, Henriette
    [J]. FOOD CONTROL, 2024, 155
  • [7] Stochasticity in economic losses increases the value of reputation in indirect reciprocity
    Miguel dos Santos
    Sarah Placì
    Claus Wedekind
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 5
  • [8] Stochasticity in economic losses increases the value of reputation in indirect reciprocity
    dos Santos, Miguel
    Placi, Sarah
    Wedekind, Claus
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2015, 5
  • [9] The impact of social comparison and (un)fairness on upstream indirect reciprocity: Evidence from ERP
    Liu, Min
    Zhou, Jiong
    Liu, Yaozhong
    Liu, Shanshi
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2022, 177
  • [10] How altruistic is indirect reciprocity? - Evidence from gift-exchange games in the lab
    Hopp, Daniel
    Suess, Karolin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2024, 108