Adolescent indirect reciprocity: Evidence from incentivized economic paradigms

被引:3
|
作者
Hu, Yang [1 ]
Ma, Jichang [1 ]
Luan, Ziyan [2 ]
Dubas, Judith Semon [2 ]
Xi, Juzhe [3 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Sch Psychol & Cognit Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Utrecht, Dept Dev Psychol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] East China Normal Univ, Sch Psychol & Cognit Sci, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
adolescents; Indirect reciprocity; Fairness; Strangers; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; 3RD-PARTY PUNISHMENT; EVOLUTION; BEHAVIOR; ADULTHOOD; IDENTITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.06.010
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Introduction: Indirect reciprocity serves as a crucial component of how we interact with strangers. Two types of indirect reciprocity can be distinguished: pay-it-forward reciprocity and third party reciprocity. Pay-it-forward reciprocity refers to behaviors where people who have been treated well by others (either fairly or generously), extend that fairness or generosity to a stranger. Third-party reciprocity refers to behaviors where third-party bystanders altruistically punish those who transgress against others or kindly help the victims. The expansion of adolescents' social world increases opportunities to exercise indirect reciprocity yet very little research has focused on this topic in this age group. The current research addresses this lacuna and investigates how younger adolescents differ from older adolescents in pay-it-forward and third party reciprocity. Methods: With incentivized economic paradigms, we investigated both types of indirect reciprocity in younger (n = 50) and older adolescents (n = 46). Results: The pay-it-forward task revealed that receiving an equal (vs. unequal) distribution led both younger and older adolescents to become fairer to a third person. In the third-party task, older adolescents were more likely to devote their own resources to enforce fairness norms than younger adolescents. Conclusion: Our results shed light on how adolescents perceive and act in complex social settings where direct reciprocity is unrealistic. Both younger and older adolescents are capable of engaging in both forms of indirect reciprocity with older adolescents being more discriminative in their norm-enforcing behaviors.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:221 / 228
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Indirect Reciprocity, Resource Sharing, and Environmental Risk: Evidence from Field Experiments in Siberia
    Howe, E. Lance
    Murphy, James J.
    Gerkey, Drew
    West, Colin Thor
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (07):
  • [12] Does prior knowledge of food fraud affect consumer behavior? Evidence from an incentivized economic experiment
    Meerza, Syed Imran Ali
    Gustafson, Christopher R.
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (12):
  • [13] Selective Cooperation in the Supermarket Field Experimental Evidence for Indirect Reciprocity
    Lange, Florian
    Eggert, Frank
    HUMAN NATURE-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY BIOSOCIAL PERSPECTIVE, 2015, 26 (04): : 392 - 400
  • [14] On the nature of reciprocity: Evidence from the ultimatum reciprocity measure
    Nicklisch, Andreas
    Wolff, Irenaeus
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2012, 84 (03) : 892 - 905
  • [15] Evidence of direct reciprocity, but not of indirect and generalized reciprocity, in the grooming exchanges of wild Barbary macaques (Macaca sylvanus)
    Molesti, Sandra
    Majolo, Bonaventura
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PRIMATOLOGY, 2017, 79 (09)
  • [16] Trust, reciprocity, and a preference for economic freedom: experimental evidence
    Mccannon, Bryan C.
    JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 10 (03) : 451 - 470
  • [17] The broken chain: Evidence against emotionally driven upstream indirect reciprocity
    Schnedler, Wendelin
    GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2022, 136 : 542 - 558
  • [18] The effect of voice on indirect reciprocity: Results from the lab
    Li, Jingping
    Cheo, Roland
    Xiao, Erte
    ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2020, 189
  • [19] Should managers be incentivized with stock or options? Evidence from China
    Chen, Fang
    Jia, Jianjun
    Lin, Yuen
    Xiang, George
    PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2022, 75
  • [20] Incentivized Peer Referrals for Tuberculosis Screening: Evidence from India
    Goldberg, J. E. S. S. I. C. A.
    Macis, M. A. R. I. O.
    Chintagunta, P. R. A. D. E. E. P.
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2023, 15 (01) : 259 - 291