Prediction of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy using simple electrocardiographic and echocardiographic tools

被引:45
|
作者
Bonakdar, Hamid Reza [1 ]
Jorat, Mohammad Vahid [1 ]
Fazelifar, Amir Farjam [1 ]
Alizadeh, Abolfath [1 ]
Givtaj, Nozar [2 ]
Sameie, Niloofar [3 ]
Sadeghpour, Anita [3 ]
Haghjoo, Majid [1 ]
机构
[1] Iran Univ Med Sci, Dept Pacemaker & Electrophysiol, Rajaie Cardiovasc Med & Res Ctr, Tehran 1996911151, Iran
[2] Iran Univ Med Sci, Dept Res Lab, Rajaie Cardiovasc Med & Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[3] Iran Univ Med Sci, Dept Echocardiog, Rajaie Cardiovasc Med & Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
来源
EUROPACE | 2009年 / 11卷 / 10期
关键词
Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Heart failure; Response; Electrocardiography; Echocardiography; VENTRICULAR CONDUCTION DELAY; CONGESTIVE-HEART-FAILURE; QRS DURATION; DILATED CARDIOMYOPATHY; POSITIVE RESPONSE; DYSSYNCHRONY; DEFIBRILLATOR; IMPROVEMENT; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1093/europace/eup258
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
To predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with heart failure (HF) and intraventricular conduction delay. The study population consisted of 82 consecutive HF patients with standard CRT indications. Patients were classified as responders, if they were alive without cardiac decompensation and experienced >= 15% decrease in left ventricular end-systolic volume. Sixty-eight percent of the enrolled patients responded to CRT. When compared with non-responders, responders had a wider baseline QRS width (P = 0.001), more marked QRS shortening (delta QRS) immediately after CRT (P = 0.001), and a better improvement in aortic velocity time integral (VTI) 24 h after CRT (P = 0.02). Moreover, there was a trend towards a greater baseline intraventricular dyssynchrony in the responder group (P = 0.07). By multivariable logistic regression, the baseline QRS width (OR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.90-0.97, P = 0.001), delta QRS (OR: 1.038, 95% CI: 1.012-1.064, P = 0.003), and acute aortic VTI (OR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.68-0.96, P = 0.017) emerged as independent predictors of response to CRT. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified a QRS width > 145 ms, delta QRS > 20 ms, and aortic VTI > 14 cm to predict responders. A positive response to CRT was observed in 68% of the patients. Cardiac resynchronization therapy response is predictable using simple electrocardiographic and echocardiographic data.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:1330 / 1337
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Electrocardiographic and echocardiographic dyssynchrony parameters that might better predict the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy than QRS morphology and duration
    András Vereckei
    Journal of Geriatric Cardiology, 2022, (02) : 98 - 100
  • [22] Electrocardiographic and echocardiographic dyssynchrony parameters that might better predict the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy than QRS morphology and duration
    András Vereckei
    Journal of Geriatric Cardiology, 2022, 19 (02) : 98 - 100
  • [23] Electrocardiographic parameters predict super-response in cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Cvijic, Marta
    Zizek, David
    Antolic, Bor
    Zupan, Igor
    JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2015, 48 (04) : 593 - 600
  • [24] Electrocardiographic Optimization of Cardiac Resynchronization Devices: Simple, but Not So Simple!
    Mont, Lluis
    Sitges, Marta
    Delgado, Victoria
    Vidal, Barbara
    Tamborero, David
    Brugada, Josep
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 103 (06): : A14 - A14
  • [25] Electrocardiographic versus Echocardiographic Optimization of the Interventricular Pacing Delay in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
    Tamborero, David
    Vidal, Barbara
    Maria Tolosana, Jose
    Sitges, Marta
    Berruezo, Antonio
    Silva, Etelvino
    Castel, Mangeles
    Matas, Mariona
    Arbelo, Elena
    Rios, Jose
    Villacastin, Julian
    Brugada, Josep
    Mont, Lluis
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 22 (10) : 1129 - 1134
  • [26] Effect of etiology of heart failure on patterns of electrocardiographic and echocardiographic changes after cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Bedi, Maninder S.
    Suffoletto, Matthew
    Tanabe, Masaki
    Gorcsan, John
    Saba, Samir
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2006, 12 (06) : S65 - S65
  • [27] Clinical outcomes and predictors of delayed echocardiographic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Tsurumi, Naoki
    Inden, Yasuya
    Yanagisawa, Satoshi
    Hiramatsu, Kei
    Yamauchi, Ryota
    Watanabe, Ryo
    Suzuki, Noriyuki
    Shimojo, Masafumi
    Suga, Kazumasa
    Tsuji, Yukiomi
    Murohara, Toyoaki
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2024, 35 (01) : 97 - 110
  • [28] AGREEMENT BETWEEN CLINICAL, ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC AND NEUROHORMONAL RESPONSE TO CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY
    Hoogslag, Georgette E.
    Hoke, Ulas
    Verwey, Harriette
    Thijssen, Joep
    Auger, Dominique
    Marsan, Nina Ajmone
    van der Wall, Ernst
    Schalij, Martin
    Bax, Jeroen
    Delgado, Victoria
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 59 (13) : E912 - E912
  • [29] Clinical versus echocardiographic parameters to assess response to cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Bleeker, GB
    Bax, JJ
    Fung, JWH
    van der Wall, EE
    Zhang, Q
    Schalij, MJ
    Chan, JYS
    Yu, CM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 97 (02): : 260 - 263
  • [30] Nuclear Cardiology for the Prediction of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
    Patel C.D.
    Mukherjee A.
    Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports, 2017, 10 (2)