Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer: A Dosimetric and Treatment Planning Comparison with Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy Techniques

被引:0
|
作者
Goswami, Brijesh [1 ]
Yadav, Suresh [2 ]
Jain, Rakesh Kumar [1 ]
Goswami, Pradeep [3 ]
机构
[1] Shobhit Inst Engn & Technol, Dept Phys, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India
[2] Gandhi Med Coll, Dept Radiat Oncol, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
[3] Inst Nucl Med & Allied Sci INMAS, Dept Radiol, Phys & Internal Dosimetry Grp, DRDO, New Delhi, India
关键词
Conformity index; Dosimetric comparison; Homogenity index; Monitor units; RapidArc; DOSE CALCULATION ALGORITHMS; QUANTITATIVE-EVALUATION; IMRT; DELIVERY; RAPIDARC; IMPLEMENTATION; XEROSTOMIA;
D O I
10.7860/JCDR/2021/47503.14661
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Traditional Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) techniques used many beam angles; the result of this is significant increase in beam on time as well as Monitor Units (MU) also. Due to all of these there is a need of faster treatment modality to increase the patient comfort and lesser organ movement. Aim: To compare the triple arc RapidArc technique with nine field IMRT techniques for different head and neck cancer, focusing on target coverage and dose received by the Organs At Risk (OARs). Materials and Methods: Retrospectively, Computed Tomography (CT) datasets of 20 patients of Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) of the Oro-pharynx and Hypo-pharynx treated during January 2019 to December 2019 were chosen for this study. For every patient, two different treatment plans were created, one by using the triple arc RapidArc technique and others by using nine fixed fields IMRT technique. For Planning Target Volume (PTV), the dose volume parameters D98% and D2% (dose received by the 98%, and 2% of the volume), homogeneity index, and Conformity Index (CI) were evaluated for dosimetric comparison. For OARs, the analysis included the mean dose, the maximum dose expressed as D2%. Additionally, the Beam On Time (BOT) and the number of MUs were analysed. A paired two-tailed t-test was performed to compare the RapidArc technique with the IMRT technique for radiotherapy treatment of different head and neck cancers. The p-value < 0.05 was considered for the significance of statistical inferences. Results: Comparable target coverage and better sparing of OARs were achieved with the RapidArc technique in comparison to IMRT. Homogeneity and conformity were also in favour of the RapidArc plan. The dosimetric results with I'MatriXX measurements of RapidArc plans were similar to IMRT Plans. All detector points passed 3 mm and 3% gamma criteria for IMRT plans and also for RapidArc plans. Conclusion: RapidArc is a faster and precise treatment technique. RapidArc provides better target coverage with good OARs sparing. Most significant change occurs in the number of MUs and treatment time, which is much lesser in RapidArc.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Is there a dosimetric advantage of volumetric modulated arc therapy over intensity modulated radiotherapy in head and neck cancer?
    Buciuman, Nikolett
    Marcu, Loredana G.
    [J]. EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2022, 279 (11) : 5311 - 5321
  • [2] Is there a dosimetric advantage of volumetric modulated arc therapy over intensity modulated radiotherapy in head and neck cancer?
    Nikolett Buciuman
    Loredana G. Marcu
    [J]. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2022, 279 : 5311 - 5321
  • [3] Dosimetric Comparison of Volumetric Arc Therapy and Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy for Glioblastoma Treatment
    Kaptan, I.
    Ugurluer, G.
    Ispir, B.
    Akdeniz, Y.
    Serin, M.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06)
  • [4] Volumetric modulated arc therapy in differentiated thyroid cancer: a treatment planning comparison with intensity-modulated radiotherapy
    Chan, Wing Lok
    Ng, Sherry C. Y.
    Law, Martin W. M.
    Lee, Victor H. F.
    Wan, K. Y.
    Leung, T. W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2015, 4 (04) : 417 - 422
  • [5] Dosimetric impact of dental metallic crown on intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy for head and neck cancer
    Kamomae, Takeshi
    Itoh, Yoshiyuki
    Okudaira, Kuniyasu
    Nakaya, Takayoshi
    Tomida, Masashi
    Miyake, Yoshikazu
    Oguchi, Hiroshi
    Shiinoki, Takehiro
    Kawamura, Mariko
    Yamamoto, Noriyuki
    Naganawa, Shinji
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 17 (01): : 234 - 245
  • [6] Dosimetric Comparison of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Volumetric Arc Therapy for Rectal Cancer
    Oskeroglu Kaplan, Sedenay
    Akboru, Halil
    Sarali, Yunus
    Altin, Suleyman
    Unsal, Mustafa
    [J]. TURK ONKOLOJI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2019, 34 (02): : 59 - 65
  • [7] Radiotherapy of prostate and head-and-neck tumour: An optimal treatment planning comparison for intensity modulated radiotherapy and volumetric modulated arctherapy techniques
    Murtaza, Ghulam
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2024, 74 (01) : 16 - 20
  • [8] Comparative dosimetric analysis of intensity modulated radiotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy
    Ali, M. Athar
    Babaiah, M.
    George, G.
    Madhusudhan, N.
    Ramalingam, K.
    Kumar, S. Ashok
    Karthikeyan, K.
    Anantharaman, A.
    Shanu, J.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 111 : S188 - S188
  • [9] Dosimetric and Volumetric impact of Intensity Modulated Adaptive Radiotherapy in Head Neck Cancer
    Mitra, S.
    Dewan, A.
    Aggarwal, S.
    Wahi, I. Singh
    Barik, S.
    Dobriyal, K.
    Mukhee, J.
    Dewan, A. K.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 152 : S917 - S917
  • [10] Dosimetric comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy for anal cancer
    Chiang, Bing-Hao
    Hibbitts, Kerry
    Ortega, Heather
    Herman, Terence
    Ahmad, Salahuddin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2020, 19 (02) : 190 - 192