Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer: A Dosimetric and Treatment Planning Comparison with Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy Techniques

被引:0
|
作者
Goswami, Brijesh [1 ]
Yadav, Suresh [2 ]
Jain, Rakesh Kumar [1 ]
Goswami, Pradeep [3 ]
机构
[1] Shobhit Inst Engn & Technol, Dept Phys, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India
[2] Gandhi Med Coll, Dept Radiat Oncol, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
[3] Inst Nucl Med & Allied Sci INMAS, Dept Radiol, Phys & Internal Dosimetry Grp, DRDO, New Delhi, India
关键词
Conformity index; Dosimetric comparison; Homogenity index; Monitor units; RapidArc; DOSE CALCULATION ALGORITHMS; QUANTITATIVE-EVALUATION; IMRT; DELIVERY; RAPIDARC; IMPLEMENTATION; XEROSTOMIA;
D O I
10.7860/JCDR/2021/47503.14661
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Traditional Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) techniques used many beam angles; the result of this is significant increase in beam on time as well as Monitor Units (MU) also. Due to all of these there is a need of faster treatment modality to increase the patient comfort and lesser organ movement. Aim: To compare the triple arc RapidArc technique with nine field IMRT techniques for different head and neck cancer, focusing on target coverage and dose received by the Organs At Risk (OARs). Materials and Methods: Retrospectively, Computed Tomography (CT) datasets of 20 patients of Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) of the Oro-pharynx and Hypo-pharynx treated during January 2019 to December 2019 were chosen for this study. For every patient, two different treatment plans were created, one by using the triple arc RapidArc technique and others by using nine fixed fields IMRT technique. For Planning Target Volume (PTV), the dose volume parameters D98% and D2% (dose received by the 98%, and 2% of the volume), homogeneity index, and Conformity Index (CI) were evaluated for dosimetric comparison. For OARs, the analysis included the mean dose, the maximum dose expressed as D2%. Additionally, the Beam On Time (BOT) and the number of MUs were analysed. A paired two-tailed t-test was performed to compare the RapidArc technique with the IMRT technique for radiotherapy treatment of different head and neck cancers. The p-value < 0.05 was considered for the significance of statistical inferences. Results: Comparable target coverage and better sparing of OARs were achieved with the RapidArc technique in comparison to IMRT. Homogeneity and conformity were also in favour of the RapidArc plan. The dosimetric results with I'MatriXX measurements of RapidArc plans were similar to IMRT Plans. All detector points passed 3 mm and 3% gamma criteria for IMRT plans and also for RapidArc plans. Conclusion: RapidArc is a faster and precise treatment technique. RapidArc provides better target coverage with good OARs sparing. Most significant change occurs in the number of MUs and treatment time, which is much lesser in RapidArc.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases: A Dosimetric and Treatment Efficiency Comparison between Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy and Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy
    Ma, Y.
    Yu, J.
    Li, M.
    Yin, Y.
    Kong, L.
    Sun, X.
    Lin, X.
    Yang, Y.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 78 (03): : S837 - S837
  • [22] Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases: A Dosimetric and Treatment Efficiency Comparison Between Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy and Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy
    Ma, Yidong
    Li, Minghuan
    Yin, Yong
    Kong, Li
    Sun, Xindong
    Lin, Xiutong
    Yu, Jinming
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2010, 9 (05) : 499 - 507
  • [23] A Dosimetric Comparison of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy and Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy in Patients Treated with Post-Mastectomy Radiotherapy
    Adeneye, Samuel
    Akpochafor, Michael
    Adedewe, Nusirat
    Habeebu, Muhammad
    Jubril, Ramotallah
    Adebayo, Abe
    Salako, Omolola
    Joseph, Adedayo
    Ariyo, Inioluwa
    Awhariado, Eseoghene
    Lawal, Rasak
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF BREAST HEALTH, 2023, 19 (01) : 92 - 98
  • [24] Dosimetric comparison of intensity modulated and volumetric arc radiation therapy for gastric cancer
    Li, Zhiping
    Zeng, Jianshuang
    Wang, Zi
    Zhu, Hong
    Wei, Yuquan
    [J]. ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2014, 8 (04) : 1427 - 1434
  • [25] RETRACTED: Dosimetric Comparison between Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) for Dental Structures of Head and Neck Cancer Patients (Retracted Article)
    Ma, Yan
    Zhou, Jianfeng
    Wang, Hongyong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE ENGINEERING, 2022, 2022
  • [26] Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Head & Neck Cancer
    Afghan, M. K. N.
    Cao, D.
    Mehta, V.
    Shepard, D.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (06) : 2901 - +
  • [27] Dosimetric comparison of head and neck cancer patients planned with multivendor volumetric modulated arc therapy technology
    Kathirvel, Murugesan
    Subramani, Vellaiyan
    Subramanian, V. S.
    Swamy, Shanmugam Thirumalai
    Arun, Gandhi
    Kala, Subramanian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2017, 13 (01) : 122 - 130
  • [28] Adaptive Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer Using Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy
    Buciuman, Nikolett
    Marcu, Loredana G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2022, 12 (05):
  • [29] Is volumetric modulated arc therapy (RapidArc) better than intensity modulated radiotherapy for gynecological malignancies A dosimetric comparison
    Sharma, Manoj Kumar
    Mitra, Swarupa
    Saxena, Upasna
    Bhushan, Manindra
    Shrivastava, Himanshu
    Simson, David K.
    Dewan, Abhinav
    Chauhan, Deepika
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2014, 10 (04) : 883 - 888
  • [30] Dosimetric comparison of coplanar and non-coplanar volumetric-modulated arc therapy in head and neck cancer treated with radiotherapy
    Gayen, Sanjib
    Kombathula, Harsha
    Manna, Sumanta
    Varshney, Sonal
    Pareek, Puneet
    [J]. RADIATION ONCOLOGY JOURNAL, 2020, 38 (02): : 138 - 147