Reliability and Utility of the Surprise Question in CKD Stages 4 to 5

被引:44
|
作者
Javier, Andrei D. [1 ,2 ]
Figueroa, Rocio [3 ]
Siew, Edward D. [1 ,2 ]
Salat, Huzaifah [1 ,2 ]
Morse, Jennifer [4 ]
Stewart, Thomas G. [4 ]
Malhotra, Rakesh [5 ]
Jhamb, Manisha [6 ]
Schell, Jane O. [6 ,7 ]
Cardona, Cesar Y. [8 ]
Maxwell, Cathy A. [9 ]
Ikizler, T. Alp [1 ,2 ]
Abdel-Kader, Khaled [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Div Nephrol & Hypertens, 1161 21st Ave S,MCN S-3223, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Ctr Kidney Dis, Nashville, TN USA
[3] Univ New Mexico, Div Nephrol, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
[4] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Biostat, 1161 21st Ave S,MCN S-3223, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
[5] Univ Calif San Diego, Div Nephrol, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[6] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Renal Electrolyte Div, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[7] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Sect Palliat Care & Med Eth, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[8] Meharry Med Coll, Div Nephrol, Nashville, TN 37208 USA
[9] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Nursing, 1161 21st Ave S,MCN S-3223, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Chronic kidney disease (CKD); non-dialysis-dependent CKD; advanced CKD; subjective health measure; clinical prediction; survival; mortality; mortality risk prediction; reliability; clinical trajectory; prognostication; end-of-life preferences; advance planning; goals-of-care discussions; geriatric; nephrology provider; CHRONIC KIDNEY-DISEASE; PATIENTS STARTING DIALYSIS; SELF-RATED HEALTH; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; RENAL-DISEASE; PALLIATIVE CARE; COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; OLDER-ADULTS; COMPARATIVE SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.11.025
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Prognostic uncertainty is one barrier to engaging in goals-of-care discussions in chronic kidney disease (CKD). The surprise question ("Would you be surprised if this patient died in the next 12 months?") is a tool to assist in prognostication. However, it has not been studied in non-dialysis-dependent CKD and its reliability is unknown. Study Design: Observational study. Setting & Participants: 388 patients at least 60 years of age with non-dialysis-dependent CKD stages 4 to 5 who were seen at an outpatient nephrology clinic. Predictor: Trinary (ie, Yes, Neutral, or No) and binary (Yes or No) surprise question response. Outcomes: Mortality, test-retest reliability, and blinded inter-rater reliability. Measurements: Baseline comorbid conditions, Charlson Comorbidity Index, cause of CKD, and baseline laboratory values (ie, serum creatinine/estimated glomerular filtration rate, serum albumin, and hemoglobin). Results: Median patient age was 71 years with median follow-up of 1.4 years, during which time 52 (13%) patients died. Using the trinary surprise question, providers responded Yes, Neutral, and No for 202 (52%), 80 (21%), and 106 (27%) patients, respectively. About 5%, 15%, and 27% of Yes, Neutral, and No patients died, respectively (P < 0.001). Trinary surprise question inter-rater reliability was 0.58 (95% CI, 0.42-0.72), and test-retest reliability was 0.63 (95% CI, 0.54-0.72). The trinary surprise question No response had sensitivity and specificity of 55% and 76%, respectively (95% CIs, 38%-71% and 71%-80%, respectively). The binary surprise question had sensitivity of 66% (95% CI, 49%-80%; P = 0.3 vs trinary), but lower specificity of 68% (95% CI, 63%-73%; P = 0.02 vs trinary). Limitations: Single center, small number of deaths. Conclusions: The surprise question associates with mortality in CKD stages 4 to 5 and demonstrates moderate to good reliability. Future studies should examine how best to deploy the surprise question to facilitate advance care planning in advanced non2dialysis-dependent CKD. (C) 2017 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 101
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] "SURPRISE QUESTION": IS IT A USEFUL TOOL IN CKD STAGES 4 TO 5?
    Pepe, Bruno
    Prazeres, Teresa
    Carnevale, Andreia
    Calca, Rita
    Matias, Patricia
    Branco, Patricia
    Azeredo-Lopes, Sofia
    Pereira, Sofia Azeredo
    Martins, Ana Rita
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 38 : I582 - I582
  • [2] Preparation of the Dialysis Access in Stages 4 and 5 CKD
    Moist, Louise M.
    Al-Jaishi, Ahmed A.
    ADVANCES IN CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE, 2016, 23 (04) : 270 - 275
  • [3] The utility and value of the "surprise question" for patients with serious illness
    Romo, Rafael D.
    Lynn, Joanne
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2017, 189 (33) : E1072 - E1073
  • [4] Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With CKD Stages 4 to 5
    Holley, Jean L.
    Von Roenn, Jamie
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2010, 56 (05) : 820 - 822
  • [5] The Utility of the Surprise Question in Identifying Patients Most at Risk of Death
    Vick, Judith
    Pertsch, Nathan
    Hutchings, Mathilde
    Neville, Bridget
    Bernacki, Rachelle
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2016, 51 (02) : 342 - 342
  • [6] Utility of the "Surprise" question to identify dialysis patients with high mortality
    Moss, Alvin H.
    Ganjoo, Jesse
    Sharma, Sanjay
    Gansor, Julie
    Senft, Sharon
    Weaner, Barbara
    Dalton, Cheryl.
    MacKay, Karen
    Pellegrino, Beth
    Anantharaman, Priya
    Schmidt, Rebecca
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2008, 3 (05): : 1379 - 1384
  • [7] Utility of the "Surprise Question" in Critically Ill Emergency Department Patients
    Glick, J.
    Gallo, Marin B.
    Chelluri, J.
    Courtright, K.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2018, 72 (04) : S68 - S68
  • [8] Nephrology Provider Surprise Question Response and Hospitalizations in Older Adults with Advanced CKD
    Ramer, Sarah J.
    Baddour, Nicolas A.
    Siew, Edward D.
    Salat, Huzaifah
    Bian, Aihua
    Stewart, Thomas G.
    Wong, Susan P. Y.
    Jhamb, Manisha
    Abdel-Kader, Khaled
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEPHROLOGY, 2020, 51 (08) : 641 - 649
  • [9] Efficacy and Safety of Dapagliflozin in Patients with CKD Stages 4-5
    Hung Chi-Chih
    Chiu Yi-Wen
    Hwang Shang-Jyh
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2024, 35 (10):
  • [10] The authors respond to "The utility and value of the "surprise question' for patients with serious illness"
    Downar, James
    Goldman, Russell
    Pinto, Ruxandra
    Englesakis, Marina
    Adhikari, Neill
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2017, 189 (33) : E1074 - E1074