Reliability and Utility of the Surprise Question in CKD Stages 4 to 5

被引:44
|
作者
Javier, Andrei D. [1 ,2 ]
Figueroa, Rocio [3 ]
Siew, Edward D. [1 ,2 ]
Salat, Huzaifah [1 ,2 ]
Morse, Jennifer [4 ]
Stewart, Thomas G. [4 ]
Malhotra, Rakesh [5 ]
Jhamb, Manisha [6 ]
Schell, Jane O. [6 ,7 ]
Cardona, Cesar Y. [8 ]
Maxwell, Cathy A. [9 ]
Ikizler, T. Alp [1 ,2 ]
Abdel-Kader, Khaled [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Div Nephrol & Hypertens, 1161 21st Ave S,MCN S-3223, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Ctr Kidney Dis, Nashville, TN USA
[3] Univ New Mexico, Div Nephrol, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
[4] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Biostat, 1161 21st Ave S,MCN S-3223, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
[5] Univ Calif San Diego, Div Nephrol, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[6] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Renal Electrolyte Div, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[7] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Sect Palliat Care & Med Eth, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[8] Meharry Med Coll, Div Nephrol, Nashville, TN 37208 USA
[9] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Nursing, 1161 21st Ave S,MCN S-3223, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Chronic kidney disease (CKD); non-dialysis-dependent CKD; advanced CKD; subjective health measure; clinical prediction; survival; mortality; mortality risk prediction; reliability; clinical trajectory; prognostication; end-of-life preferences; advance planning; goals-of-care discussions; geriatric; nephrology provider; CHRONIC KIDNEY-DISEASE; PATIENTS STARTING DIALYSIS; SELF-RATED HEALTH; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; RENAL-DISEASE; PALLIATIVE CARE; COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; OLDER-ADULTS; COMPARATIVE SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.11.025
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Prognostic uncertainty is one barrier to engaging in goals-of-care discussions in chronic kidney disease (CKD). The surprise question ("Would you be surprised if this patient died in the next 12 months?") is a tool to assist in prognostication. However, it has not been studied in non-dialysis-dependent CKD and its reliability is unknown. Study Design: Observational study. Setting & Participants: 388 patients at least 60 years of age with non-dialysis-dependent CKD stages 4 to 5 who were seen at an outpatient nephrology clinic. Predictor: Trinary (ie, Yes, Neutral, or No) and binary (Yes or No) surprise question response. Outcomes: Mortality, test-retest reliability, and blinded inter-rater reliability. Measurements: Baseline comorbid conditions, Charlson Comorbidity Index, cause of CKD, and baseline laboratory values (ie, serum creatinine/estimated glomerular filtration rate, serum albumin, and hemoglobin). Results: Median patient age was 71 years with median follow-up of 1.4 years, during which time 52 (13%) patients died. Using the trinary surprise question, providers responded Yes, Neutral, and No for 202 (52%), 80 (21%), and 106 (27%) patients, respectively. About 5%, 15%, and 27% of Yes, Neutral, and No patients died, respectively (P < 0.001). Trinary surprise question inter-rater reliability was 0.58 (95% CI, 0.42-0.72), and test-retest reliability was 0.63 (95% CI, 0.54-0.72). The trinary surprise question No response had sensitivity and specificity of 55% and 76%, respectively (95% CIs, 38%-71% and 71%-80%, respectively). The binary surprise question had sensitivity of 66% (95% CI, 49%-80%; P = 0.3 vs trinary), but lower specificity of 68% (95% CI, 63%-73%; P = 0.02 vs trinary). Limitations: Single center, small number of deaths. Conclusions: The surprise question associates with mortality in CKD stages 4 to 5 and demonstrates moderate to good reliability. Future studies should examine how best to deploy the surprise question to facilitate advance care planning in advanced non2dialysis-dependent CKD. (C) 2017 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 101
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Low mortality and improved outcomes in a cohort of subjects with CKD stages 4 and 5 followed prospectively for 2 years in an academic CKD clinic.
    Serrano, A
    Nishi, L
    Gangavathi, A
    Madhan, V
    Ghossein, C
    Paparello, J
    Ahya, S
    Khosla, N
    Batlle, D
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2005, 45 (04) : A47 - A47
  • [32] Antihypertensive Treatment Patterns in CKD Stages 3 and 4: The CKD-REIN Cohort Study
    Costes-Albrespic, Margaux
    Liabeuf, Sophie
    Laville, Solene
    Jacquelinet, Christian
    Combe, Christian
    Fouque, Denis
    Laville, Maurice
    Frimat, Luc
    Pecoits-Filho, Roberto
    Lambert, Oriane
    Massy, Ziad A.
    Sautenet, Benedicte
    de Pinho, Natalia Alencar
    KIDNEY MEDICINE, 2024, 6 (12)
  • [33] Lifetime Incidence of CKD Stages 3-5 in the United States
    Grams, Morgan E.
    Chow, Eric K. H.
    Segev, Dorry L.
    Coresh, Josef
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2013, 62 (02) : 245 - 252
  • [34] RENOPROTECTIVE EFFECT OF PENTOXIFYLLINE AT PATIENTS WITH CKD 2-5 STAGES
    Mansurova, Inkar
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 31 : 169 - 169
  • [35] Prognosis of IgA Nephropathy with Stages 3b-5 CKD
    Wu, Zhanfei
    Li, Hongfen
    Liu, Youxia
    Wang, Fanghao
    Xing, Yue
    Li, Wenying
    Jia, Junya
    Yan, Tiekun
    KIDNEY & BLOOD PRESSURE RESEARCH, 2024, 49 (01): : 273 - 285
  • [37] AUTONOMOUS HYPERPARARHYROIDISM IN CKD STAGES 3-4 TREATED WITH CINACALCET
    Reyes, Joselyn
    Dasilva, Iara
    Furlano, Monica
    Calero, Francesca
    Montanes, Rosario
    Ayasreh, Nadia
    Del Pozo, Maitane
    Estorch, M.
    Rousaud, Ferran
    Ballarin, Jose A.
    Bover, Jordi
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 27 : 156 - 156
  • [38] Prevalence of ambulatory hypotension in elderly patients with CKD stages 3 and 4
    Tomlinson, Laurie A.
    Holt, Stephen G.
    Leslie, Allison R.
    Rajkumar, Chakravarthi
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 24 (12) : 3751 - 3755
  • [39] Paricalcitol capsule for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in stages 3 and 4 CKD
    Coyne, D
    Acharya, M
    Qiu, P
    Abboud, H
    Batlle, D
    Rosansky, S
    Fadem, S
    Levine, B
    Williams, L
    Andress, DL
    Sprague, SM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2006, 47 (02) : 263 - 276
  • [40] Stage 5-CKD under nephrology care: to dialyze or not to dialyze, that is the question
    Mario Pacilio
    Roberto Minutolo
    Carlo Garofalo
    Maria Elena Liberti
    Giuseppe Conte
    Luca De Nicola
    Journal of Nephrology, 2016, 29 : 153 - 161