Utility of the "Surprise" question to identify dialysis patients with high mortality

被引:242
|
作者
Moss, Alvin H. [1 ,2 ]
Ganjoo, Jesse
Sharma, Sanjay
Gansor, Julie
Senft, Sharon
Weaner, Barbara
Dalton, Cheryl.
MacKay, Karen
Pellegrino, Beth
Anantharaman, Priya
Schmidt, Rebecca
机构
[1] W Virginia Univ, Sch Med, Ctr Eth & Law, Dept Med,Sect Nephrol, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
[2] W Virginia Univ, Robert C Byrd Hlth Sci Ctr, Ctr Hlth Eth & Law, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2215/CJN.00940208
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and objectives: Dialysis patients are increasingly characterized by older age, multiple comorbidities, and shortened life expectancy. This study investigated whether the "surprise" question, "Would I be surprised if this patient died in the next year?" identifies patients who are at high risk for early mortality. Design, setting, participants, & measurements: This prospective cohort study of 147 patients in three hemodialysis dialysis units classified patients into "yes" and "no" groups on the basis of the "surprise" question response and tracked patient status (alive or dead) at 12 mo. Demographics, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, and Karnofsky Performance Status score were measured. Results: Initially, 34 (23%) patients were classified in the "no" group. Compared with the 113 patients in the "yes" group, the patients in the "no" group were older (72.5 +/- 12.8 versus 64.5 +/- 14.9), had a higher comorbidity score (7.1 +/- 2.3 versus 5.8 +/- 2.1), and had a lower performance status score (69.7 +/- 17.1 versus 81.6 +/- 15.8). At 12 mo, 22 (15%) patients had died; the mortality rate for the "no" group was 29.4% and for the "yes" group was 10.6%. The odds of dying within I yr for the patients in the "no" group were 3.5 times higher than for patients in the "yes" group, (odds ratio 3.507, 95% CI 1.356 to 9.067, P = 0.01). Conclusions: The "surprise" question is effective in identifying sicker dialysis patients who have a high risk for early mortality and should receive priority for palliative care interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:1379 / 1384
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validation of the Surprise Question in an Ethnically Diverse Population to Identify Seriously Ill Dialysis Patients
    Moss, Alvin H.
    Harbert, Glenda
    Aldous, Annette
    Nicklas, Amanda C.
    Lupu, Dale
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2021, 32 (10): : 287 - 287
  • [2] Integrating the Surprise Question, Palliative Care Screening Tool, and Clinical Risk Models to Identify Peritoneal Dialysis Patients With High One-Year Mortality
    Lai, Chun-Fu
    Cheng, Ching-, I
    Chang, Chin-Hao
    Chen, Yi-Ting
    Hwang, Hsiau-Chien
    Lin, Shuei-Liong
    Huang, Jenq-Wen
    Huang, Sheng-Jean
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2020, 60 (03) : 613 - +
  • [3] No Surprise: The Surprise Question Works in an Ethnically Diverse Dialysis Patient Population to Identify Seriously Ill
    Moss, Alvin
    Lupu, Dale
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2022, 63 (05) : 908 - 909
  • [4] PREDICTING 12-MONTH MORTALITY FOR PERITONEAL DIALYSIS PATIENTS USING THE "SURPRISE" QUESTION
    Pang, Wing-Fai
    Kwan, Bonnie Ching-Ha
    Chow, Kai-Ming
    Leung, Chi-Bon
    Li, Philip Kam-Tao
    Szeto, Cheuk-Chun
    PERITONEAL DIALYSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 33 (01): : 60 - 66
  • [5] The utility and value of the "surprise question" for patients with serious illness
    Romo, Rafael D.
    Lynn, Joanne
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2017, 189 (33) : E1072 - E1073
  • [6] IS THE SURPRISE QUESTION USEFUL AS A PREDICTOR OF MORTALITY IN HEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS?
    Kasabji, Jorge Estifan
    Lucas, Cristina
    Sastre, Arancha
    De Leon, Benjamin
    Barnes, Carmen
    Monfa, Elena
    Barcia, Veronica
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 35 : 1452 - 1452
  • [7] The Utility of the Surprise Question in Identifying Patients Most at Risk of Death
    Vick, Judith
    Pertsch, Nathan
    Hutchings, Mathilde
    Neville, Bridget
    Bernacki, Rachelle
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2016, 51 (02) : 342 - 342
  • [8] Utility of the "Surprise Question" in Critically Ill Emergency Department Patients
    Glick, J.
    Gallo, Marin B.
    Chelluri, J.
    Courtright, K.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2018, 72 (04) : S68 - S68
  • [9] Identifying Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis at High Risk of Transfer to Hemodialysis Using a Modified Surprise Question
    Anwaar, Ayesha
    Abra, Graham E.
    Nielsen, Hatsumi
    Sun, Sumi J.
    Liu, Sai
    Montez-Rath, Maria E.
    Schiller, Brigitte
    Hussein, Wael F.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2021, 32 (10): : 328 - 328
  • [10] The authors respond to "The utility and value of the "surprise question' for patients with serious illness"
    Downar, James
    Goldman, Russell
    Pinto, Ruxandra
    Englesakis, Marina
    Adhikari, Neill
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2017, 189 (33) : E1074 - E1074