konfound: Command to quantify robustness of causal inferences

被引:96
|
作者
Xu, Ran [1 ]
Frank, Kenneth A. [2 ]
Maroulis, Spiro J. [3 ]
Rosenberg, Joshua M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Tech, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Falls Church, VA 22043 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Counseling Educ Psychol & Special Educ, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[3] Arizona State Univ, Sch Publ Affairs, Tempe, AR USA
[4] Univ Tennessee, Coll Educ Hlth & Human Sci, Knoxville, TN USA
来源
STATA JOURNAL | 2019年 / 19卷 / 03期
关键词
st0565; konfound; mkonfound; pkonfound; causal inferences; bias; confounding; robustness or sensitivity analyses; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; BIAS FORMULAS; SCHOOL; IMPACT; TRANSITIONS; PERFORMANCE; INCENTIVES; OWNERSHIP; NETWORKS;
D O I
10.1177/1536867X19874223
中图分类号
O1 [数学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Statistical methods that quantify the discourse about causal inferences in terms of possible sources of biases are becoming increasingly important to many social-science fields such as public policy, sociology, and education. These methods are also known as "robustness or sensitivity analyses". A series of recent works (Frank [2000, Sociological Methods and Research 29: 147-194]; Pan and Frank [2003, Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 28: 315- 337]; Frank and Min [2007, Sociological Methodology 37: 349-392]; and Frank et al. [2013, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 35: 437-460]) on robustness analysis extends earlier methods. We implement these recent developments in Stata. In particular, we provide commands to quantify the percent bias necessary to invalidate an inference from a Rubin causal model framework and the robustness of causal inferences in terms of correlations associated with unobserved variables.
引用
收藏
页码:523 / 550
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Causal Framework to Quantify the Robustness of Mathematical Reasoning with Language Models
    Stolfo, Alessandro
    Jin, Zhijing
    Shridhar, Kumar
    Scholkopf, Bernhard
    Sachan, Mrinmaya
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 61ST ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS, ACL 2023, VOL 1, 2023, : 545 - 561
  • [2] Quantifying the robustness of causal inferences: Sensitivity analysis for pragmatic social science
    Frank, Kenneth A.
    Lin, Qinyun
    Xu, Ran
    Maroulis, Spiro
    Mueller, Anna
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2023, 110
  • [3] What Would It Take to Change an Inference? Using Rubin's Causal Model to Interpret the Robustness of Causal Inferences
    Frank, Kenneth A.
    Maroulis, Spiro J.
    Duong, Minh Q.
    Kelcey, Benjamin M.
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSIS, 2013, 35 (04) : 437 - 460
  • [4] Beware of Causal Inferences
    Fiedler, Klaus
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL AND THEORETICAL ECONOMICS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR DIE GESAMTE STAATSWISSENSCHAFT, 2018, 174 (01): : 99 - 104
  • [5] Spontaneous causal inferences
    Hassin, RR
    Bargh, JA
    Uleman, JS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 38 (05) : 515 - 522
  • [6] Synthesizing Causal Inferences
    Briggs, Derek C.
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHER, 2008, 37 (01) : 15 - 22
  • [7] Causal Support: Modeling Causal Inferences with Visualizations
    Kale, Alex
    Wu, Yifan
    Hultman, Jessica
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VISUALIZATION AND COMPUTER GRAPHICS, 2022, 28 (01) : 1150 - 1160
  • [8] ANOVA and Alternatives for Causal Inferences
    Hahn, Sonja
    [J]. DATA ANALYSIS, MACHINE LEARNING AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY, 2014, : 343 - 350
  • [9] YOUNG CHILDRENS CAUSAL INFERENCES
    DASGUPTA, P
    BRYANT, PE
    [J]. CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1989, 60 (05) : 1138 - 1146
  • [10] CAUSAL INFERENCES AS PERCEPTUAL JUDGMENTS
    ANDERSON, JR
    SHEU, CF
    [J]. MEMORY & COGNITION, 1995, 23 (04) : 510 - 524