Unraveling the Causes of the Seismicity Induced by Underground Gas Storage at Castor, Spain

被引:33
|
作者
Vilarrasa, Victor [1 ,2 ,3 ]
De Simone, Silvia [1 ,4 ]
Carrera, Jesus [1 ,3 ]
Villasenor, Antonio [5 ]
机构
[1] Spanish Natl Res Council IDAFA CSIC, Inst Environm Assessment & Water Res, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Spanish Natl Res Council IMEDEA CSIC, Mediterranean Inst Adv Studies, Esporles, Spain
[3] UPC CSIC, Hydrogeol Grp, Associated Unit, Barcelona, Spain
[4] Univ Rennes, Ctr Sci Res, Geosci Rennes, Rennes, France
[5] Spanish Natl Res Council ICM CSIC, Inst Marine Sci, Barcelona, Spain
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
GEOLOGIC CARBON STORAGE; VALENCIA TROUGH; FLUID INJECTIONS; EARTHQUAKES; STRESS; FAULTS; SHEAR; GULF;
D O I
10.1029/2020GL092038
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The offshore Castor Underground Gas Storage (UGS) project had to be halted after gas injection triggered three M4 earthquakes, each larger than any ever induced by UGS. The mechanisms that induced seismicity in the crystalline basement at 5-10 km depth after gas injection at 1.7 km depth remain unknown. Here, we propose a combination of mechanisms to explain the observed seismicity. First, the critically stressed Amposta fault, bounding the storage formation, crept by the superposition of well-known overpressure effects and buoyancy of the relatively light injected gas. This aseismic slip brought an unmapped critically stressed fault in the hydraulically disconnected crystalline basement to failure. We attribute the delay between induced earthquakes to the pressure drop associated to expansion of areas where earthquakes slips cause further instabilities. Earthquakes occur only after these pressure drops have dissipated. Understanding triggering mechanisms is key to forecast induced seismicity and successfully design deep underground operations. Plain Language Summary Underground fluid injection for energy-related activities usually induces microseismicity (not felt earthquakes). But felt earthquakes are sometimes induced, which may cause public concern and project cancellation. This was the case of the offshore Castor underground gas storage (UGS), Spain. Gas injection induced numerous seismic events, including three with magnitudes around 4, larger than any other earthquake ever induced by UGS. These earthquakes occurred after the stop of injection in the crystalline basement, which is hydraulically disconnected from, and significantly deeper than the storage formation. To explain this seismicity, we propose a combination of mechanisms. First, the Amposta fault, bounding the site, crept (failed slowly, aseismically) because of pore pressure buildup induced by injection, which reduces the effective compression stabilizing faults, and stress variations caused by gas buoyancy. Aseismic slip of the Amposta fault provoked underground displacements, which reactivated a critically stressed unmapped fault in the crystalline basement. We attribute the delay between earthquakes of the sequence to rock expansion, and stabilizing pore pressure drop, in areas where slip displacement might cause new earthquakes. Earthquakes occur only after the pressure drop dissipates, which takes some time. Assessing fault stability prior to gas injection would have identified the risk of inducing seismicity.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] ECONOMICS OF UNDERGROUND STORAGE OF OIL AND GAS
    HINTERHU.HH
    JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY, 1971, 23 (NDEC): : 1450 - &
  • [42] Underground Storage of Gas and Petroleum.
    Schlumberger, E.
    Revue Francaise de l'Energie, 1973, 25 (257): : 97 - 105
  • [43] Seismological Investigations of Induced Earthquakes Near the Hutubi Underground Gas Storage Facility
    Zhou, Pengcheng
    Yang, Hongfeng
    Wang, Baoshan
    Zhuang, Jiancang
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2019, 124 (08) : 8753 - 8770
  • [44] Underground Gas Storage in a Partially Depleted Gas Reservoir
    Azin, R.
    Nasiri, A.
    Entezari, A. Jodeyri
    OIL & GAS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-REVUE D IFP ENERGIES NOUVELLES, 2008, 63 (06): : 691 - 703
  • [45] Modeling of underground gas storage in a depleted gas field
    Gumrah, F
    Izgec, Ö
    Gokcesu, U
    Bagci, S
    ENERGY SOURCES, 2005, 27 (10): : 913 - 920
  • [46] Underground gas storage in a partially depleted gas reservoir
    Soroush, M.
    Alizadeh, N.
    JOURNAL OF CANADIAN PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 47 (02): : 17 - 21
  • [47] Modeling of Gas Flows in Underground Gas Storage Facilities
    Iwaszczuk, Natalia
    Prytula, Myroslav
    Prytula, Nazar
    Pyanylo, Yaroslav
    Iwaszczuk, Aleksander
    ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (19)
  • [48] Monitoring and Balance of Gas Flow in Underground Gas Storage
    Danel, Roman
    Otte, Lukas
    Vancura, Vladislav
    Repka, Michal
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EARTH SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PROCEEDINGS, 2013, 6 : 485 - 491
  • [49] CORROSION OF UNDERGROUND-STORAGE TANKS - CAUSES AND CURES
    FITZGERALD, JH
    PLANT ENGINEERING, 1983, 37 (15) : 46 - 48
  • [50] Induced Seismicity Monitoring of an Underground Salt Cavern Prone to Collapse
    Mercerat, E. D.
    Driad-Lebeau, L.
    Bernard, P.
    PURE AND APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2010, 167 (1-2) : 5 - 25