Unraveling the Causes of the Seismicity Induced by Underground Gas Storage at Castor, Spain

被引:33
|
作者
Vilarrasa, Victor [1 ,2 ,3 ]
De Simone, Silvia [1 ,4 ]
Carrera, Jesus [1 ,3 ]
Villasenor, Antonio [5 ]
机构
[1] Spanish Natl Res Council IDAFA CSIC, Inst Environm Assessment & Water Res, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Spanish Natl Res Council IMEDEA CSIC, Mediterranean Inst Adv Studies, Esporles, Spain
[3] UPC CSIC, Hydrogeol Grp, Associated Unit, Barcelona, Spain
[4] Univ Rennes, Ctr Sci Res, Geosci Rennes, Rennes, France
[5] Spanish Natl Res Council ICM CSIC, Inst Marine Sci, Barcelona, Spain
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
GEOLOGIC CARBON STORAGE; VALENCIA TROUGH; FLUID INJECTIONS; EARTHQUAKES; STRESS; FAULTS; SHEAR; GULF;
D O I
10.1029/2020GL092038
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The offshore Castor Underground Gas Storage (UGS) project had to be halted after gas injection triggered three M4 earthquakes, each larger than any ever induced by UGS. The mechanisms that induced seismicity in the crystalline basement at 5-10 km depth after gas injection at 1.7 km depth remain unknown. Here, we propose a combination of mechanisms to explain the observed seismicity. First, the critically stressed Amposta fault, bounding the storage formation, crept by the superposition of well-known overpressure effects and buoyancy of the relatively light injected gas. This aseismic slip brought an unmapped critically stressed fault in the hydraulically disconnected crystalline basement to failure. We attribute the delay between induced earthquakes to the pressure drop associated to expansion of areas where earthquakes slips cause further instabilities. Earthquakes occur only after these pressure drops have dissipated. Understanding triggering mechanisms is key to forecast induced seismicity and successfully design deep underground operations. Plain Language Summary Underground fluid injection for energy-related activities usually induces microseismicity (not felt earthquakes). But felt earthquakes are sometimes induced, which may cause public concern and project cancellation. This was the case of the offshore Castor underground gas storage (UGS), Spain. Gas injection induced numerous seismic events, including three with magnitudes around 4, larger than any other earthquake ever induced by UGS. These earthquakes occurred after the stop of injection in the crystalline basement, which is hydraulically disconnected from, and significantly deeper than the storage formation. To explain this seismicity, we propose a combination of mechanisms. First, the Amposta fault, bounding the site, crept (failed slowly, aseismically) because of pore pressure buildup induced by injection, which reduces the effective compression stabilizing faults, and stress variations caused by gas buoyancy. Aseismic slip of the Amposta fault provoked underground displacements, which reactivated a critically stressed unmapped fault in the crystalline basement. We attribute the delay between earthquakes of the sequence to rock expansion, and stabilizing pore pressure drop, in areas where slip displacement might cause new earthquakes. Earthquakes occur only after the pressure drop dissipates, which takes some time. Assessing fault stability prior to gas injection would have identified the risk of inducing seismicity.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Seismicity at the Castor gas reservoir driven by pore pressure diffusion and asperities loading
    Simone Cesca
    Daniel Stich
    Francesco Grigoli
    Alessandro Vuan
    José Ángel López-Comino
    Peter Niemz
    Estefanía Blanch
    Torsten Dahm
    William L. Ellsworth
    Nature Communications, 12
  • [22] Seismicity at the Castor gas reservoir driven by pore pressure diffusion and asperities loading
    Cesca, Simone
    Stich, Daniel
    Grigoli, Francesco
    Vuan, Alessandro
    Angel Lopez-Comino, Jose
    Niemz, Peter
    Blanch, Estefania
    Dahm, Torsten
    Ellsworth, William L.
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 12 (01)
  • [23] UNDERGROUND-STORAGE OF OIL AND GAS
    JANSSON, G
    UNDERGROUND SPACE, 1983, 7 (4-5): : 275 - 277
  • [24] Optimal design of underground gas storage
    Kravanja, S.
    Zlender, B.
    HIGH PERFORMANCE STRUCTURES AND MATERIALS V, 2010, 112 : 389 - 399
  • [25] Wingas expands underground gas storage
    不详
    OIL & GAS JOURNAL, 1999, 97 (37) : 44 - 44
  • [26] UNDERGROUND STORAGE OF OIL AND GAS.
    Bergman, S.Magnus
    Journal of Energy Engineering, 1984, 110 (03) : 181 - 190
  • [27] Mechanical analysis on underground gas storage
    Jianghan Shiyou Xueyuan Xuebao/Journal of Jianghan Petroleum Institute, 2000, 22 (01): : 46 - 47
  • [28] A method for increasing underground gas storage
    Melikyan, Z
    EXPLORING ENERGY & FACILITIES MANAGEMENT OPPORTUNITIES IN A CHANGING MARKETPLACE, 1999, : 125 - 128
  • [29] Cost optimization of the underground gas storage
    Zlender, Bojan
    Kravanja, Stojan
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2011, 33 (09) : 2554 - 2562
  • [30] BACTERIOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF STORAGE OF GAS UNDERGROUND
    PANKHURST, ES
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED BACTERIOLOGY, 1968, 31 (03): : 311 - +