Preventive healthcare for young children: A systematic review of interventions in primary care

被引:15
|
作者
Alexander, Karyn E. [1 ]
Brijnath, Bianca [1 ,2 ]
Biezen, Ruby [1 ]
Hampton, Kerry [1 ]
Mazza, Danielle [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Sch Primary Hlth Care, Dept Gen Practice, Bldg 1,270 Ferntree Gully Rd,Notting Hill, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Curtin Univ, Sch Occupat Therapy & Social Work, Fac Hlth Sci, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Systematic review; Family practice; Primary health care; Intervention; Child; preschool; Preventive health; Child development; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; EARLY-CHILDHOOD CARIES; SUPPORT READING ALOUD; KIDS CHECK; OBESITY PREVENTION; PRESCHOOL-CHILDREN; MANAGEMENT; SERVICES; IMPROVE; IMPLEMENTATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.02.024
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
High rates of preventable health problems amongst children in economically developed countries have prompted governments to seek pathways for early intervention. We systematically reviewed the literature to discover what primary care-targeted interventions increased preventive healthcare (e.g. review child development, growth, vision screening, social-emotional health) for preschool children, excluding vaccinations. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases were searched for published intervention studies, between years 2000 and 2014, which reflected preventive health activities for preschool children, delivered by health practitioners. Analysis included an assessment of study quality and the primary outcome measures employed. Of the 743 titles retrieved, 29 individual studies were selected, all originating from the United States. Twenty-four studies employed complex, multifaceted interventions and only two were rated high quality. Twelve studies addressed childhood overweight and 11 targeted general health and development. Most interventions reported outcomes that increased rates of screening, recording and recognition of health risks. Only six studies followed up children post-intervention, noting low referral rates by health practitioners and poor follow-through by parents and no study demonstrated clear health benefits for children. Preliminary evidence suggests that multi-component interventions, that combine training of health practitioners and office staff with modification of the physical environment and/or practice support, may be more effective than single component interventions. Quality Improvement interventions have been extensively replicated but their success may have relied on factors beyond the confines of individual or practice-led behaviour. This research reinforces the need for high quality studies of pediatric health assessments with the inclusion of clinical end-points. Crown Copyright (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:236 / 250
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Delaying and reversing frailty: a systematic review of primary care interventions
    Travers, John
    Romero-Ortuno, Roman
    Bailey, Jade
    Cooney, Marie-Therese
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2019, 69 (678): : E61 - E69
  • [42] A systematic review of interventions to provide genetics education for primary care
    Paneque, Milena
    Turchetti, Daniela
    Jackson, Leigh
    Lunt, Peter
    Houwink, Elisa
    Skirton, Heather
    [J]. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2016, 17
  • [43] Regarding “Effectiveness of Intensive Primary Care Interventions: A Systematic Review”
    Samuel T. Edwards
    Kim Peterson
    Mark Helfand
    [J]. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2018, 33 : 994 - 994
  • [44] Effects of educational interventions on primary dementia care: A systematic review
    Perry, M.
    Draskovic, I.
    Lucassen, P.
    Vernooij-Dassen, M.
    van Achterberg, T.
    Rikkert, M. Olde
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2011, 26 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [45] Primary Care Interventions to Support Breastfeeding Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force
    Patnode, Carrie D.
    Henninger, Michelle L.
    Senger, Caitlyn A.
    Perdue, Leslie A.
    Whitlock, Evelyn P.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 316 (16): : 1694 - 1705
  • [46] Mental health interventions for children in foster care: A systematic review
    Hambrick, Erin P.
    Oppenheim-Weller, Shani
    N'zi, Amanda M.
    Taussig, Heather N.
    [J]. CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2016, 70 : 65 - 77
  • [47] Sexual health interventions for young people in state care: a systematic review
    Hammarstrom, Sofia
    Stenqvist, Karin
    Lindroth, Malin
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 46 (08) : 817 - 834
  • [48] Efficacy of Interventions to Improve Motor Development in Young Children: A Systematic Review
    Riethmuller, Annaleise M.
    Jones, Rachel A.
    Okely, Anthony D.
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2009, 124 (04) : E782 - E792
  • [49] Social Validity Assessment in Behavior Interventions for Young Children: A Systematic Review
    Park, Eun-Young
    Blair, Kwang-Sun Cho
    [J]. TOPICS IN EARLY CHILDHOOD SPECIAL EDUCATION, 2019, 39 (03) : 156 - 169
  • [50] Noncompliance Assessments, Interventions, and Ethical Considerations for Young Children: A Systematic Review
    Malone, Elisabeth J.
    Zimmerman, Kathleen N.
    [J]. TOPICS IN EARLY CHILDHOOD SPECIAL EDUCATION, 2023,