Preventive healthcare for young children: A systematic review of interventions in primary care

被引:15
|
作者
Alexander, Karyn E. [1 ]
Brijnath, Bianca [1 ,2 ]
Biezen, Ruby [1 ]
Hampton, Kerry [1 ]
Mazza, Danielle [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Sch Primary Hlth Care, Dept Gen Practice, Bldg 1,270 Ferntree Gully Rd,Notting Hill, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Curtin Univ, Sch Occupat Therapy & Social Work, Fac Hlth Sci, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Systematic review; Family practice; Primary health care; Intervention; Child; preschool; Preventive health; Child development; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; EARLY-CHILDHOOD CARIES; SUPPORT READING ALOUD; KIDS CHECK; OBESITY PREVENTION; PRESCHOOL-CHILDREN; MANAGEMENT; SERVICES; IMPROVE; IMPLEMENTATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.02.024
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
High rates of preventable health problems amongst children in economically developed countries have prompted governments to seek pathways for early intervention. We systematically reviewed the literature to discover what primary care-targeted interventions increased preventive healthcare (e.g. review child development, growth, vision screening, social-emotional health) for preschool children, excluding vaccinations. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases were searched for published intervention studies, between years 2000 and 2014, which reflected preventive health activities for preschool children, delivered by health practitioners. Analysis included an assessment of study quality and the primary outcome measures employed. Of the 743 titles retrieved, 29 individual studies were selected, all originating from the United States. Twenty-four studies employed complex, multifaceted interventions and only two were rated high quality. Twelve studies addressed childhood overweight and 11 targeted general health and development. Most interventions reported outcomes that increased rates of screening, recording and recognition of health risks. Only six studies followed up children post-intervention, noting low referral rates by health practitioners and poor follow-through by parents and no study demonstrated clear health benefits for children. Preliminary evidence suggests that multi-component interventions, that combine training of health practitioners and office staff with modification of the physical environment and/or practice support, may be more effective than single component interventions. Quality Improvement interventions have been extensively replicated but their success may have relied on factors beyond the confines of individual or practice-led behaviour. This research reinforces the need for high quality studies of pediatric health assessments with the inclusion of clinical end-points. Crown Copyright (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:236 / 250
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Clinical preventive guidelines for school-aged children and adolescents in primary care: a protocol for a systematic review
    Patseadou, Magdalini
    Pfarrwaller, Eva
    Haller, Dagmar
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (12):
  • [32] Economic evidence of preventive interventions for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents - a systematic review
    Vartiainen, A. -K.
    Kuvaja-Kollner, V.
    Rantsi, M.
    Rissanen, E.
    Luntamo, T.
    Kurki, M.
    Sourander, A.
    Kankaanpaa, E.
    [J]. EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 65 : S684 - S684
  • [33] Financial Interventions to Improve Screening in Primary Care: A Systematic Review
    Matthews, Samantha
    Qureshi, Nabeel
    Levin, Jonathan S.
    Eberhart, Nicole K.
    Breslau, Joshua
    McBain, Ryan K.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2024, 67 (01) : 134 - 146
  • [34] Primary Care Interventions for Early Childhood Development: A Systematic Review
    Peacock-Chambers, Elizabeth
    Ivy, Kathryn
    Bair-Merritt, Megan
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2017, 140 (06)
  • [35] Regarding "Effectiveness of Intensive Primary Care Interventions: A Systematic Review"
    Edwards, Samuel T.
    Peterson, Kim
    Helfand, Mark
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 33 (07) : 994 - 994
  • [36] A systematic review of interventions to provide genetics education for primary care
    Milena Paneque
    Daniela Turchetti
    Leigh Jackson
    Peter Lunt
    Elisa Houwink
    Heather Skirton
    [J]. BMC Family Practice, 17
  • [37] DELAYING AND REVERSING FRAILTY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF PRIMARY CARE INTERVENTIONS
    Travers, John
    Romero-Ortuno, Roman
    Bailey, Jade
    Cooney, Therese
    [J]. AGE AND AGEING, 2018, 47
  • [38] MULTIDISCIPLINARY INTERVENTIONS FOR MULTISITE OSTEOARTHRITIS IN PRIMARY CARE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Finney, A.
    Healey, E.
    Ryan, S.
    Jordan, J.
    Dziedzic, K.
    [J]. OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2012, 20 : S190 - S191
  • [39] A systematic review of chronic disease management interventions in primary care
    Rebecca Reynolds
    Sarah Dennis
    Iqbal Hasan
    Jan Slewa
    Winnie Chen
    David Tian
    Sangeetha Bobba
    Nicholas Zwar
    [J]. BMC Family Practice, 19
  • [40] A systematic review of chronic disease management interventions in primary care
    Reynolds, Rebecca
    Dennis, Sarah
    Hasan, Iqbal
    Slewa, Jan
    Chen, Winnie
    Tian, David
    Bobba, Sangeetha
    Zwar, Nicholas
    [J]. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2018, 19