Buying and building success: Perceptions of organizational strategies for improvement

被引:0
|
作者
Gillath, Omri [1 ]
Crandall, Christian S. [1 ]
Wann, Daniel L. [2 ]
White, Mark H., II [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kansas, Dept Psychol, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
[2] Murray State Univ, Dept Psychol, Murray, KY 42071 USA
关键词
ability; attributions; bought; built; cohesiveness; effort; sports teams; HUMAN-RESOURCE ARCHITECTURE; WORK; ACHIEVEMENT; BEHAVIOR; ABILITY; SPORT; COHESIVENESS; ATTRIBUTION; VALIDATION; EXISTENCE;
D O I
10.1111/jasp.12755
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
What makes people like a team? We suggest and test here whether people's perceptions of teams and organizations differ as a function of the strategy the teams pick on their way to success. Two main strategies are compared: (1) Development is a strategy focused on building and enhancing the abilities of current team members; and (2) Acquisition is a strategy focused on buying talent from outside the organization. Does the way to success matter? In other words, will the strategy a team endorse affects how much people like the team? In five studies (N = 1,672) we tested whether people prefer teams that were successful by being (a) built through long-term development of team members or (b) bought by acquiring expensive personal developed elsewhere. Across the five studies, people preferred built teams over bought teams, including sport teams and law firms. Effort and group cohesion were more attributed to build than to bought teams. In a "mediators contest," effort attributions proved most robust. People like built teams more than bought ones, mostly because they value the effort and hard work that built teams represent.
引用
收藏
页码:534 / 546
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条