Immediate Versus Conventional Loading with Fixed Full-Arch Prostheses in Mandibles with Failing Dentition: A Prospective Controlled Study

被引:23
|
作者
Penarrocha-Oltra, David [1 ]
Covani, Ugo [2 ]
Penarrocha, Miguel [3 ]
Penarrocha-Diago, Maria [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valencia, Sch Med & Dent, Dept Stomatol, Oral Surg & Implantol, E-46003 Valencia, Spain
[2] Univ Pisa, Dept Surg, I-56100 Pisa, Italy
[3] Univ Valencia, Sch Med & Dent, Dept Stomatol, E-46003 Valencia, Spain
[4] Univ Valencia, Sch Med & Dent, Dept Stomatol, Oral Surg, E-46003 Valencia, Spain
关键词
controlled clinical trial; full-arch prosthesis; immediate loading; immediate implants; loading protocols; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; IMPLANT PLACEMENT; TILTED IMPLANTS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; RISK-FACTORS; REHABILITATION; SURVIVAL; MAXILLA; RESTORATIONS; FRESH;
D O I
10.11607/jomi.3534
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare immediate and conventional loading protocols for fixed full-arch mandibular prostheses supported by immediate and nonimmediate implants. Materials and Methods: A prospective controlled nonrandomized study with 12 months of follow-up included patients requiring fixed full-arch rehabilitations supported by immediate and nonimmediate implants. Eighteen patients were treated with conventional loading (control group), and 18 were treated with immediate loading (test group). Each patient received four to six implants; implants with insertion torque < 35 Ncm were excluded from the study and loaded conventionally. The following variables were assessed: implant success, biologic and prosthetic complications, success of the immediately loaded provisional prostheses, and marginal bone loss. Statistical analysis was performed with nonparametric tests (chi-square, Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis) with an alpha value of.05. Results: Thirtysix patients consecutively enrolled in the study. Two control group patients failing to attend control visits and 12 implants that did not achieve an insertion torque of 35 Ncm were excluded. The final sample consisted of 34 patients and 183 implants (98 test and 85 control implants). Implant success rates were 99.0% (test) and 97.6% (control). Within the test group, success rates for immediate and nonimmediate implants were 100% and 97.6%, respectively. Differences were not statistically significant. All immediately loaded prostheses were successful. Five provisional fixed prostheses presented with loosened screws; all control group patients reported discomfort with the provisional denture. Average bone loss was 0.71 mm (standard deviation 0.25 mm) in the test group and 0.60 mm (standard deviation 0.28 mm) in the control group. Conclusion: No significant differences were seen in implant success and peri-implant marginal bone loss between immediate and conventional loading of mandibular fixed full-arch prostheses supported by immediate and nonimmediate implants. Biologic and prosthetic complications were rare, and all immediately loaded provisional fixed prostheses performed successfully.
引用
收藏
页码:427 / 434
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Transition from Failing Dentition to Full-Arch Fixed Implant-Supported Prosthesis with a Staged Approach Using Removable Partial Dentures: A Case Series
    Gonzalez Cortes, Arthur Rodriguez
    Cortes, Djalma Nogueira
    No-Cortes, Juliana
    Arita, Emiko Saito
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2014, 23 (04): : 328 - 332
  • [42] Seven-Year Follow-up of Full-Arch Prostheses Supported by Four Implants: A Prospective Study
    Ayub, Karen Vaz
    Ayub, Eduardo Antonio
    do Valle, Accacio Lins
    Bonfante, Gerson
    Pegoraro, Thiago
    Pegoraro, Luiz Fernando
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2017, 32 (06) : 1351 - 1358
  • [43] Immediate versus early or conventional loading dental implants with fixed prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials
    Chen, Jie
    Cai, Min
    Yang, Jiajun
    Aldhohrah, Taghrid
    Wang, Yan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2019, 122 (06): : 516 - 536
  • [44] The accuracy of conventional versus digital (intraoral scanner or photogrammetry) impression techniques in full-arch implant-supported prostheses: a systematic review
    Joensahakij, Nitchakul
    Serichetaphongse, Pravej
    Chengprapakorn, Wareeratn
    [J]. EVIDENCE-BASED DENTISTRY, 2024,
  • [45] Immediate versus non-immediate implantation for full arch fixed reconstruction: A retrospective comparative study.
    SchwartzArad, D
    Gulyaev, N
    Chaushu, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1997, 76 (05) : 1163 - 1163
  • [46] Three-year data from a randomized, controlled study of early loading of single-stage dental implants supporting maxillary full-arch prostheses
    Fischer, K
    Stenberg, T
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2006, 21 (02) : 245 - 252
  • [47] Long-Term Results After Immediate Loading of Platform-Switched Implants in Smokers Versus Nonsmokers with Full-Arch Restorations
    Romanos, Georgios E.
    Gaertner, Kathrin
    Aydin, Erhan
    Nentwig, Georg-Hubertus
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2013, 28 (03) : 841 - 845
  • [48] Immediate versus conventional loading of mandibular implant-supported fixed prostheses in edentulous patients: 10-year report of a randomised controlled trial
    Alfadda, Sara Abdulaziz
    Chvartszaid, David
    Tulbah, Huda Ismail
    Finer, Yoav
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2019, 12 (04) : 431 - 446
  • [49] Immediate Loading Implant-Supported Fixed Full-Arch Rehabilitation Using a New Clinical Decision-Support System: A Case Series
    Bahaa, Ahmed
    Bahaa, Abdallah
    El-Bagoury, Nada
    Khaled, Nora
    El-Mohandes, Wael A.
    Ibrahim, Ahmed M.
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (08)
  • [50] A Prospective Study of Implant-Supported Full-Arch Yttria-Stabilized Tetragonal Zirconia Polycrystal Mandibular Fixed Dental Prostheses: Three-Year Results
    Larsson, Christel
    von Steyern, Per Vult
    Nilner, Krister
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2010, 23 (04) : 364 - 369