Long-Term Results After Immediate Loading of Platform-Switched Implants in Smokers Versus Nonsmokers with Full-Arch Restorations

被引:26
|
作者
Romanos, Georgios E. [1 ,2 ]
Gaertner, Kathrin [3 ]
Aydin, Erhan [2 ]
Nentwig, Georg-Hubertus [2 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Stony Brook, Sch Dent Med, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[2] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Sch Dent, Dept Oral Surg & Implantol, D-60054 Frankfurt, Germany
[3] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Sch Dent, Dept Operat Dent, D-60054 Frankfurt, Germany
关键词
dental implants; immediate loading; platform switching; smoking; success; LOADED IMPLANTS; CIGARETTE-SMOKING; DENTAL IMPLANTS; MULTICENTER; SURVIVAL; MAXILLA; TISSUE;
D O I
10.11607/jomi.3223
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: Few studies have compared the effects of immediate loading on implant prognoses in smokers and nonsmokers. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the long-term success of immediately loaded platform-switched implants placed in smokers and nonsmokers with edentulous jaws. Materials and Methods: Platform-switched implants were placed using the same treatment protocol in the healed edentulous jaws of two groups of patients: group A patients had smoked at least 20 cigarettes a day for more than 10 years, and group B consisted of nonsmokers. All implants were loaded immediately with provisional fixed prostheses, and definitive cement-retained restorations were delivered 4 to 6 weeks later without removing the abutments. In a standardized follow-up protocol, the implants were evaluated clinically and radiographically at the start of loading, 4 to 6 weeks later, and annually thereafter. Results: Sixty-six implants (36 in the maxilla and 30 in the mandible) were placed in eight smokers. Twelve nonsmokers received 97 implants (55 in the maxilla and 42 in the mandible). During an average loading period of 62.53 (+/- 44.13) months for the smokers and 98.20 (+/- 19.53) months for the nonsmokers, three implants failed. Two failed in group A (one because of overloading and one because of peri-implanitis) and one failed in group B (overloading), resulting in implant survival rates of 97% and 99%, respectively. No significant differences were found between groups regarding plaque, bleeding, probing pocket depths, or crestal bone loss, either mesially or distally, resulting in success rates of 92.42% for group A and 98.00% for group B. Conclusions: Long-term clinical outcomes for immediately loaded platform-shifted implants placed in heavy smokers appear to be comparable to those for nonsmokers if the abutments are placed on the day of surgery and never removed.
引用
收藏
页码:841 / 845
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Immediate Versus Nonimmediate Placement of Implants for Full-Arch Fixed Restorations: A Preliminary Study
    Penarrocha-Diago, Maria A.
    Maestre-Ferrin, Laura
    Demarchi, Carla Leandro
    Penarrocha-Oltra, David
    Penarrocha-Diago, Miguel
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2011, 69 (01) : 154 - 159
  • [2] Long-term follow-up of full-arch immediate implant-supported restorations in edentulous jaws: a clinical study
    Werbelow, Laura
    Weiss, Michael
    Schramm, Alexander
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2020, 6 (01)
  • [3] Four-year post-loading results of full-arch rehabilitation with immediate placement and immediate loading implants: A retrospective controlled study
    Simonpieri, Alain
    Gasparro, Roberta
    Pantaleo, Giuseppe
    Mignogna, Jolanda
    Riccitiello, Francesco
    Sammartino, Gilberto
    QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 48 (04): : 315 - 324
  • [4] Long-term follow-up of full-arch immediate implant-supported restorations in edentulous jaws: a clinical study
    Laura Werbelow
    Michael Weiss
    Alexander Schramm
    International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 6
  • [5] Crestal bone resorption around platform-switched dental implants with fine threaded neck after immediate and delayed loading
    Heinemann, Friedhelm
    Hasan, Istabrak
    Schwahn, Christian
    Biffar, Reiner
    Mundt, Torsten
    BIOMEDIZINISCHE TECHNIK, 2010, 55 (06): : 317 - 321
  • [6] Medium- and Long-Term Complications in Full-Arch Rehabilitations Supported by Upright and Tilted Implants
    Francetti, Luca
    Corbella, Stefano
    Taschieri, Silvio
    Cavalli, Nicolo
    Del Fabbro, Massimo
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2015, 17 (04) : 758 - 764
  • [7] Bone Level Changes Around Axial and Tilted Implants in Full-Arch Fixed Immediate Restorations. Interim Results of a Prospective Study
    Francetti, Luca
    Romeo, Davide
    Corbella, Stefano
    Taschieri, Silvio
    Del Fabbro, Massimo
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2012, 14 (05) : 646 - 654
  • [8] Unconventional Implants for Distal Cantilever Fixed Full-Arch Prostheses: A Long-Term Evaluation of Four Cases
    Minoretti, Roger
    Triaca, Albino
    Saulacic, Nikola
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2012, 32 (02) : 203 - 204
  • [9] Long-term evaluation of Astra Tech and Branemark implants in patients treated with full-arch bridges. Results after 12-15years
    Ravald, Nils
    Dahlgren, Simon
    Teiwik, Anders
    Grondahl, Kerstin
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2013, 24 (10) : 1144 - 1151
  • [10] Immediate versus early loading of flapless-placed implants supporting maxillary full-arch prostheses: a randomised controlled clinical trial
    Cannizzaro, Gioacchino
    Torchio, Cinzia
    Leone, Michele
    Esposito, Marco
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2008, 1 (02) : 127 - 139