Evaluation of the environmental and economic impacts of electric propulsion systems onboard ships: case study passenger vessel

被引:22
|
作者
Ammar, Nader R. [1 ,2 ]
Seddiek, Ibrahim S. [3 ]
机构
[1] King Abdulaziz Univ, Fac Maritime Studies, Dept Marine Engn, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
[2] Alexandria Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Naval Architecture & Marine Engn, Alexandria 21544, Egypt
[3] Arab Acad Sci Technol & Maritime Transport, Coll Maritime Transport & Technol, Dept Marine Engn Technol, Alexandria 1029, Egypt
关键词
Passenger ships; IMO regulations; Diesel electric propulsion; COGES propulsion; Ship emissions; Cost-effectiveness analysis;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-021-13271-4
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The International Maritime Organization (IMO) announced that maritime transport share by 2.89% in global greenhouse gases. Electric propulsion system appears as a promising option for reducing ship emissions, especially for high-powered vessels. The aim of the current paper is to investigate the environmental and economic impact of using electric propulsion systems. Simple eco-environmental model was presented to assess the best propulsion system for passenger ships. A comparison between diesel electric (DE) and combined gas turbine electric and steam (COGES) propulsion systems is conducted. As a case study, one of the cruise ships is selected. The results showed specific environmental benefits of COGES over DE propulsion option. From the design and operational viewpoints, COGES propulsion system is more energy efficient than DE by 9.3% and 27.55%, respectively. Economically, the values of the life cycle costs are 5,013 and 6,042 $/kW for DE and COGES systems, respectively. Finally, COGES seems as a greener option with a life-cycle cost-effectiveness of 612, 1970, and 6 $/ton for NOx, SOx, and CO2 emissions, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:37851 / 37866
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Holistic Assessment of Social, Environmental and Economic Impacts of Pipe Breaks: The Case Study of Vancouver
    Sinaei, Armine
    Dziedzic, Rebecca
    Creaco, Enrico
    WATER, 2025, 17 (02)
  • [42] Regional economic and environmental impacts of wind power developments: A case study of a German region
    Jenniches, Simon
    Worrell, Ernst
    Fumagalli, Elena
    ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 132 : 499 - 514
  • [43] Economic and Environmental Evaluation of Aluminium Recycling based on a Belgian Case Study
    Soo, Vi Kie
    Peeters, Jef R.
    Compston, Paul
    Doolan, Matthew
    Duflou, Joost R.
    SUSTAINABLE MANUFACTURING FOR GLOBAL CIRCULAR ECONOMY, 2019, 33 : 639 - 646
  • [44] Modelling and valuing the environmental impacts of arable, forestry and agroforestry systems: a case study
    de Jalon, Silvestre Garcia
    Graves, Anil
    Palma, Joao H. N.
    Williams, Adrian
    Upson, Matt
    Burgess, Paul J.
    AGROFORESTRY SYSTEMS, 2018, 92 (04) : 1059 - 1073
  • [45] Modelling and valuing the environmental impacts of arable, forestry and agroforestry systems: a case study
    Silvestre García de Jalón
    Anil Graves
    Joao H. N. Palma
    Adrian Williams
    Matt Upson
    Paul J. Burgess
    Agroforestry Systems, 2018, 92 : 1059 - 1073
  • [46] A case study of the potential environmental impacts of different dairy production systems in Georgia
    Belflower, Jeff B.
    Bernard, John K.
    Gattie, David K.
    Hancock, Dennis W.
    Risse, Lawrence M.
    Rotz, C. Alan
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2012, 108 : 84 - 93
  • [47] Environmental and economic benefits of electric, hybrid and conventional vehicle treatment: A case study of Lithuania
    Petrauskiene, Kamile
    Tverskyte, Rasa
    Dvarioniene, Jolanta
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2022, 140 : 55 - 62
  • [48] Comparative economic and environmental analysis of conventional, hybrid and electric vehicles - the case study of Greece
    Nanaki, Evanthia A.
    Koroneos, Christopher J.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2013, 53 : 261 - 266
  • [49] The Economic and Technical Impacts of Houston's Electric Vehicles on the Texas Transmission System: A Case Study
    Wert, Jessica L.
    Chang, Heather
    Safdarian, Farnaz
    Overbye, Thomas J.
    Xu, Yanzhi
    2022 IEEE KANSAS POWER AND ENERGY CONFERENCE (KPEC 2022), 2022,
  • [50] Life cycle environmental impacts and carbon emissions: A case study of electric and gasoline vehicles in China
    Yu, Ang
    Wei, Yiqun
    Chen, Wenwen
    Peng, Najun
    Peng, Lihong
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 65 : 409 - 420