Economic and Environmental Evaluation of Aluminium Recycling based on a Belgian Case Study

被引:28
|
作者
Soo, Vi Kie [1 ]
Peeters, Jef R. [2 ]
Compston, Paul [1 ]
Doolan, Matthew [1 ]
Duflou, Joost R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Res Sch Engn, Coll Engn & Comp Sci, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Mech Engn, Celestijnenlaan 300A, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium
关键词
Al recycling; End-of-Life; Recycling efficiency; Life Cycle Assessment; Economic evaluation; IMPACT; OPTIMIZATION; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.promfg.2019.04.080
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The increasing demand for aluminium (Al) has led to the significant growth of secondary Al production. Although Al is one of the most recycled metal streams, the presence of impurities, such as iron, silicon and copper, has limited the environmental and economic benefits of recycling Al. These competing interests have led to the choice of recycling options that is suboptimal This paper evaluates the economic and environmental effects of recycling different Al scrap qualities based on data collected from a Belgian recycling facility. Observations from the case study show that the profit-driven recycling market has led to a recycling system that does not produce the best environmental impact outcome. Maximising the environmental benefits of material recycling is often secondary to profit generation from the recyclers' perspective. There is a need for stricter measures, such as environmental tax on primary Al production, to address the environmental and economic challenges in the current recycling systems. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:639 / 646
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Lifecycle assessment and economic evaluation of recycling: A case study
    Craighill, AL
    Powell, JC
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 1996, 17 (02) : 75 - 96
  • [2] Lifecycle assessment and economic evaluation of recycling: a case study
    Univ of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom
    Resour Conserv Recycl, 2 (75-96):
  • [3] An assessment of the recycling potential of materials based on environmental and economic factors; case study in South Korea
    Kim, Junbeum
    Hwang, Yongwoo
    Park, Kwangho
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2009, 17 (14) : 1264 - 1271
  • [4] Environmental and economic analysis of aluminium recycling through life cycle assessment
    Olivieri, Gennana
    Romani, Annalisa
    Neri, Paolo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND WORLD ECOLOGY, 2006, 13 (04): : 269 - 276
  • [5] The effects of recycling loops in food waste management in Japan: Based on the environmental and economic evaluation of food recycling
    Takata, Miki
    Fukushima, Kazuyo
    Kino-Kimata, Noriko
    Nagao, Norio
    Niwa, Chiaki
    Toda, Tatsuki
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 432 : 309 - 317
  • [6] Environmental and economic benefit of recycling model of packaging waste:a case study on aluminum
    Huang Pingsha Department of Environmental Science
    ChineseJournalofPopulation,ResourcesandEnvironment, 2004, ResourcesandEnvironment.2004 (03) : 30 - 36
  • [7] Energy, Economic and Environmental Savings by Waste Recycling: A Case Study of Madinah City
    Nizami, Abdul-Sattar
    Rehan, Mohammad
    Naqvi, Muhammad
    Ouda, Omar
    Shahzad, Khurram
    Syamsiro, Mohammad
    Waqas, Muhammad
    Miandad, Rashid
    Asam, Zaki-ul-Zaman
    Ismail, Iqbal Mohammad
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 142 : 910 - 915
  • [8] Environmental and economic evaluation of solar panel wastes recycling
    Gonen, Cagdas
    Kaplanoglu, Elif
    WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2019, 37 (04) : 412 - 418
  • [9] Economic and environmental feasibility evaluation study of hydrometallurgical recycling methods for perovskite solar cells
    Oh, Hyunmin
    Bae, Jongil
    Han, Jeehoon
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2025, 489
  • [10] Economic and environmental evaluation of transporting imported pellet: A case study
    Paolotti, L.
    Martino, G.
    Marchini, A.
    Pascolini, R.
    Boggia, A.
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2015, 83 : 340 - 353