Low-Dose NOACs Versus Standard-Dose NOACs or Warfarin on Efficacy and Safety in Asian Patients with NVAF: A Meta-Analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Li, Ze [1 ]
Zheng, Yingming [1 ]
Li, Dandan [1 ]
Wang, Xiaozhen [2 ]
Cheng, Sheng [1 ]
Luo, Xiao [1 ]
Wen, Aipin [1 ]
机构
[1] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Friendship Hosp, Dept Pharm, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Capital Med Univ, Xuanwu Hosp, Cent Lab, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
ANATOLIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY | 2022年 / 26卷 / 06期
关键词
Atrial fibrillation; NOACs; warfarin; meta-analysis; NONVALVULAR ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION; ANTAGONIST ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS; JAPANESE PATIENTS; BLEEDING RISK; VS; WARFARIN; RIVAROXABAN; DABIGATRAN; APIXABAN; EDOXABAN; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.5152/AnatolJCardiol.2022.1376
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials has illustrated that the efficacy of low-dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants is inferior compared with standard-dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants, though they are still frequently prescribed for Asian patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. We aimed to further investigate the efficacy and safety of low-dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants by carrying out a meta-analysis of all relevant randomized controlled trials and cohort studies. Methods: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and MEDLINE were systematically searched from the inception to September 9, 2021, for randomized controlled trials or cohorts that compared the efficacy and/or safety of low-dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in Asian patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. The primary outcomes were stroke and major bleeding, and the secondary outcomes were mortality, intracranial hemorrhage, and gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Hazard ratios and 95% CIs were estimated using the random-effect model. Results: Nineteen publications involving 371 574 Asian patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation were included. Compared with standard-dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants, low-dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants showed comparable risks of stroke (hazard ratio, 1.18; 95% CI 0.98 to 1.42), major bleeding (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% CI 0.83 to 1.21), intracranial hemorrhage (hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% CI 0.92 to 1.38), and gastrointestinal hemorrhage (hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% CI 0.87 to 1.31), though had a higher risk of mortality (hazard ratio, 1.34; 95% CI 1.05 to 1.71). Compared with warfarin, low-dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants were associated with lower risks of stroke (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI 0.67 to 0.79), mortality (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI 0.60 to 0.81), major bleeding (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% CI 0.51 to 0.75), intracranial hemorrhage (hazard ratio, 0.48; 95% CI 0.33 to 0.69), and gastrointestinal hemorrhage (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% CI 0.65 to 0.93). Conclusion: Low-dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants were superior to warfarin, and comparable to standard-dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants considering risks of stroke, major bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, and gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Further, high qualified studies are warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:424 / +
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Prasugrel, Ticagrelor, and Standard-Dose and High-Dose Clopidogrel in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Network Meta-analysis
    Singh, Sukhchain
    Singh, Mukesh
    Grewal, Navsheen
    Khosla, Sandeep
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THERAPEUTICS, 2016, 23 (01) : E52 - E62
  • [32] Efficacy and safety of low-dose versus high-dose hydrocortisone to treat hypotension in neonates: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sushko, Katelyn
    Al-Rawahi, Nada
    Watterberg, Kristi
    Van den Anker, John
    Litalien, Catherine
    Lacroix, Jacques
    Razak, Abdul
    Samiee-Zafarghandy, Samira
    [J]. BMJ PAEDIATRICS OPEN, 2021, 5 (01)
  • [33] Efficacy and safety of high-dose vs low-dose leucovorin in patients with colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hsu, C. Y.
    Chen, C. Y.
    Lin, Y. M.
    Tam, K. W.
    [J]. COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2020, 22 (01) : 6 - 17
  • [34] Comparison of low-dose deferoxamine versus standard-dose deferoxamine for treatment of aluminium overload among haemodialysis patients
    Kan, Wei-Chih
    Chien, Chih-Chiang
    Wu, Chia-Chun
    Su, Shih-Bin
    Hwang, Jyh-Chang
    Wang, Hsien-Yi
    [J]. NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 25 (05) : 1604 - 1608
  • [35] Efficacy and safety of low-dose sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Wen-Wen
    Jiang, Juan
    Gao, Jie
    Zhang, Xiu-Zhen
    Li, Yuan-Min
    Liu, Yan-Lin
    Dang, He-Qin
    [J]. CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 46 (03) : 296 - 303
  • [36] Alternative-Dose versus Standard-Dose Trivalent Influenza Vaccines for Immunocompromised Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Control Trials
    Lai, Jiun-Ji
    Lin, Chin
    Ho, Ching-Liang
    Chen, Po-Huang
    Lee, Cho-Hao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2019, 8 (05)
  • [37] The efficacy and safety of low-dose rituximab in immune thrombocytopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Yunjie
    Shi, Yuye
    He, Zhengmei
    Chen, Qiuni
    Liu, Zhenyou
    Yu, Liang
    Wang, Chunling
    [J]. PLATELETS, 2019, 30 (06) : 690 - 697
  • [38] LOW-DOSE VERSUS STANDARD-DOSE ALTEPLASE FOR THE TREATMENT OF HIGH-RISK PULMONARY EMBOLISM
    Haber, Ariel
    Jutba, Ada
    Kaseer, Haya
    Younis, Moustafa
    Ataya, Ali
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2024, 52
  • [39] Low-dose versus standard-dose normal temporal bone CT in children: a comparison study
    Rashma, R.
    Kumar, Jyoti
    Garg, Anju
    Batra, Radhika
    Meher, Ravi
    Phulia, Ankita
    [J]. EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2024, 55 (01):
  • [40] LOW-DOSE VERSUS STANDARD-DOSE DILTIAZEM BOLUS IN ATRIAL FIBRILLATION WITH RAPID VENTRICULAR RESPONSE
    Lambert, Kerry
    Lederer, Henry
    Chaudhari, Chirag
    Adamczyk, Michelle
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2021, 49 (01) : 159 - 159