Comparative study between local anesthesia and general anesthesia in the treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax

被引:13
|
作者
Jung, Joonho [1 ]
Kim, Do Hyung [2 ]
Son, Joohyung [2 ]
Lee, Sung Kwang [2 ]
Son, Bong Soo [2 ]
机构
[1] Ajou Univ Hosp, Dept Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg, Suwon, South Korea
[2] Pusan Natl Univ, Med Res Inst, Yangsan Hosp, Dept Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg, Busan, South Korea
关键词
Bullectomy; non-intubated; video-assisted thoracoscopic (VAT); pneumothorax; ASSISTED THORACIC-SURGERY; THORACOSCOPIC SURGERY;
D O I
10.21037/atm.2019.09.89
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: There is increasing interest in non-intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). At present, this method is used in various types of thoracic surgery. Especially, simple wedge resection via VATS is thought to be an optimal indication of non-intubated VATS. This study was performed to evaluate the usefulness of VATS bullectomy under local anesthesia by comparison with bullectomy under general anesthesia. Methods: A total of 183 cases of wedge resection under general anesthesia and 52 cases of wedge resection under local anesthesia were examined. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed to assess the feasibility, usability, and cost effectiveness of wedge resection under local anesthesia. The preoperative clinical parameters, including age, sex, and the number of pneumothorax episodes and previous operations, were used to match cases and controls. Results: There were no significant differences between the local and general anesthesia groups in operative time (57.5 +/- 23.1 and 56.6 +/- 25.6 min, respectively; P=0.857), type of operation [single-incision thoracoscopic surgery (SITS), n=48 and n=47, respectively; multi-port-VATS (M-VATS), n=4 and n=5, respectively; P=0.730], or chest tube indwelling time (3.6 +/- 1.5 and 4.4 +/- 2.5 days, respectively; P=0.064). The mean times from arrival at the operating room (OR) to skin incision (16.4 +/- 12.3 and 46.4 +/- 17.2 min, respectively; P<0.001), and from the end of surgery to arrival at the general ward (36.0 +/- 25.6 and 58.1 +/- 20.9 min, respectively; P<0.001) were significantly shorter in the local anesthesia group than the general anesthesia group. The total cost was significantly lower in the local anesthesia group than in the general anesthesia group (4,890.6 +/- 717.1 and 5,739.1 +/- 1,154.6, respectively; P<0.001). Conclusions: Local anesthesia shortened the overall hospital stay by reducing the interval between admission and surgery, allowing immediate ambulation after surgery. In addition, this method reduced costs by avoiding the need for anesthesia.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Thoracoscopic treatment for primary spontaneous pneumothorax at a general hospital
    H. J. C. Klaue
    S. Schneider
    E. Bauer
    Der Chirurg, 1999, 70 : 36 - 41
  • [22] Comparative study between general and thoracic spinal anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Ellakany, Mohamed
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2013, 29 (04) : 375 - 381
  • [23] A comparative study between propofol and etomidate in patients under general anesthesia
    Aggarwal, Supriya
    Goyal, Vipin Kumar
    Chaturvedi, Shashi Kala
    Mathur, Vijay
    Baj, Birbal
    Kumar, Alok
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA, 2016, 66 (03): : 237 - 241
  • [24] COMPARATIVE STUDY OF GENERAL ANESTHESIA VERSUS DROPERIDOL AND KETAMINE ANESTHESIA IN BURNED CHILDREN
    MILLER, B
    SRINIVASAGAM, N
    AANA JOURNAL-AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSE ANESTHETISTS, 1974, 42 (03): : 236 - 240
  • [25] Is local anesthesia an affordable alternative to general anesthesia for minilaparoscopy?
    Zupi, E
    Marconi, D
    Sbracia, M
    Solima, E
    Zullo, F
    Dauri, M
    Romanini, C
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GYNECOLOGIC LAPAROSCOPISTS, 2000, 7 (01): : 111 - 114
  • [26] Evipal anesthesia and the combination of intravenous with general and local anesthesia
    Widenhorn, HL
    SURGERY GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1937, 64 : 89 - 93
  • [27] General Anesthesia Versus Local Anesthesia for Carotid Surgery
    Komotar, Ricardo J.
    Syed, Omar N.
    Connolly, E. Sander, Jr.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2009, 64 (05) : N10 - N11
  • [28] GENERAL-ANESTHESIA VERSUS CONTINUOUS EPIDURAL-ANESTHESIA IN PRIMARY CESAREAN-SECTION - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY
    KRAUS, H
    DICK, W
    TRAUB, E
    TOLLNER, U
    BURGHARD, R
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GEBURTSHILFE UND PERINATOLOGIE, 1983, 187 (04): : 194 - 199
  • [29] No difference between local or general anesthesia for carotid surgery
    Mazighi, Mikael
    SANG THROMBOSE VAISSEAUX, 2009, 21 (03): : 109 - 109
  • [30] COMPARATIVE STUDIES ON GENERAL-ANESTHESIA VERSUS PERIDURAL ANESTHESIA IN PRIMARY CESAREAN-SECTION
    TRAUB, E
    DICK, W
    KNOCHE, E
    MUCK, J
    KRAUS, H
    TOLLNER, U
    ANAESTHESIST, 1984, 33 (01): : 15 - 24