A narrative review shows the unvalidated use of self-report questionnaires for individual medication as outcome measures

被引:16
|
作者
Paterson, C
Britten, N
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Dept Social Med, Bristol BS8 2PR, Avon, England
[2] Peninsula Med Sch, Inst Clin Educ, Exeter, Devon, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
outcome; medication; medication diary; questionnaire; literature search; literature review;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.03.012
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Accurate individualized data on drug consumption is required for a number of purposes. While electronic medication event monitoring is the best objective measure available, self-report tools would be a useful alternative in certain situations. We searched for validated self-completion questionnaires suitable for measuring change in medication. Methods: A systematic search of the English language literature since 1980, and a narrative literature review. Results: Few articles described the development or use of self-report methods to measure change in medication over time. We found no questionnaire that was commonly used for this purpose, nor one that had been evaluated and published. Considerable work has been undertaken to develop questionnaires or diaries for individual projects, but because these tools and their validation are rarely published, they are not available for other researchers to use, and comparison across studies is difficult. Some work has been done developing diary formats and the Medication Quantification Scale converts complex medication change data to a single numerical score. Conclusion: Medication change is rarely considered as an outcome, and when it is measured, nonstandardized methods are used. More attention needs to be given to developing self-report tools and validating them across a range of criteria. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:967 / 973
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Weight Bias: A Systematic Review of Characteristics and Psychometric Properties of Self-Report Questionnaires
    Lacroix, Emilie
    Alberga, Angela
    Russell-Mathew, Shelly
    McLaren, Lindsay
    von Ranson, Kristin
    [J]. OBESITY FACTS, 2017, 10 (03) : 223 - 237
  • [42] Congruence of three self-report measures of medication adherence among HIV patients
    Gao, X
    Nau, DP
    [J]. ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2000, 34 (10) : 1117 - 1122
  • [43] Reasonable psychometric standards for self-report outcome measures in audiological rehabilitation
    Hyde, ML
    [J]. EAR AND HEARING, 2000, 21 (04): : 24S - 36S
  • [44] PREDICTING SCHIZOPHRENIA OUTCOME WITH SELF-REPORT MEASURES OF FAMILY-INTERACTION
    HAFNER, RJ
    MILLER, RM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 47 (01) : 33 - 41
  • [45] The use of response latencies to enhance self-report personality measures
    Siem, FM
    [J]. MILITARY PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 8 (01) : 15 - 27
  • [46] SELF-REPORT MEASURES TO EVALUATE SEXUAL DESIRE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Moyano, N.
    Rojas-Garcia, A.
    Sierra, J. C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2011, 8 : 296 - 296
  • [47] Experiences of Weight Stigmatization: A Review of Self-Report Assessment Measures
    DePierre, Jenny A.
    Puhl, Rebecca M.
    [J]. OBESITY FACTS, 2012, 5 (06) : 897 - 918
  • [48] Review of self-report symptom measures in pediatric oncology research
    Reeve, Bryce B.
    Baker, Justin
    Freyer, David
    Jacobs, Shana
    Keller, Susan
    Kohler, R. Kelly
    Lyons, Jessica C.
    Mack, Jennifer
    Mowbray, Catriona
    Sung, Lillian
    Tomlinson, Deborah
    Withycombe, Janice
    Hinds, Pamela
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2013, 22
  • [49] Assessment of anxiety in older adults: a review of self-report measures
    Balsamo, Michela
    Cataldi, Fedele
    Carlucci, Leonardo
    Fairfield, Beth
    [J]. CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS IN AGING, 2018, 13 : 573 - 593
  • [50] Self-report measures of secure attachment in adulthood: A systematic review
    Justo-Nunez, Miranda
    Morris, Lydia
    Berry, Katherine
    [J]. CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY & PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2022, 29 (06) : 1812 - 1842