A narrative review shows the unvalidated use of self-report questionnaires for individual medication as outcome measures

被引:16
|
作者
Paterson, C
Britten, N
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Dept Social Med, Bristol BS8 2PR, Avon, England
[2] Peninsula Med Sch, Inst Clin Educ, Exeter, Devon, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
outcome; medication; medication diary; questionnaire; literature search; literature review;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.03.012
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Accurate individualized data on drug consumption is required for a number of purposes. While electronic medication event monitoring is the best objective measure available, self-report tools would be a useful alternative in certain situations. We searched for validated self-completion questionnaires suitable for measuring change in medication. Methods: A systematic search of the English language literature since 1980, and a narrative literature review. Results: Few articles described the development or use of self-report methods to measure change in medication over time. We found no questionnaire that was commonly used for this purpose, nor one that had been evaluated and published. Considerable work has been undertaken to develop questionnaires or diaries for individual projects, but because these tools and their validation are rarely published, they are not available for other researchers to use, and comparison across studies is difficult. Some work has been done developing diary formats and the Medication Quantification Scale converts complex medication change data to a single numerical score. Conclusion: Medication change is rarely considered as an outcome, and when it is measured, nonstandardized methods are used. More attention needs to be given to developing self-report tools and validating them across a range of criteria. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:967 / 973
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A systematic review of self-report measures of generalized shame
    Lear, M. Kati
    Lee, Eric B.
    Smith, Sarah M.
    Luoma, Jason B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 78 (07) : 1288 - 1330
  • [32] Systematic Review of Self-Report Family Assessment Measures
    Hamilton, Elena
    Carr, Alan
    [J]. FAMILY PROCESS, 2016, 55 (01) : 16 - 30
  • [33] Review article: self-report measures to evaluate constipation
    Mccrea, G. L.
    Miaskowski, C.
    Stotts, N. A.
    Macera, L.
    Hart, S. A.
    Varma, M. G.
    [J]. ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2008, 27 (08) : 638 - 648
  • [34] Respondent perspectives on self-report measures of condom use
    Geary, CW
    Tchupo, JP
    Johnson, L
    Cheta, C
    Nyama, T
    [J]. AIDS EDUCATION AND PREVENTION, 2003, 15 (06) : 499 - 515
  • [35] Self-Report Measures of Boredom: An Updated Review of the Literature
    Vodanovich, Stephen J.
    Watt, John D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 150 (02): : 194 - 226
  • [36] Comment on Patricia Moran: "Selecting self-report outcome measures for use in family and systemic therapy'
    Stratton, Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FAMILY THERAPY, 2017, 39 (01) : 57 - 59
  • [37] Use of Patient Self-Report Oral Health Outcome Measures in Assessment of Dental Treatment Outcomes
    Wright, Wanda G.
    Jones, Judith A.
    Spiro, Avron, III
    Rich, Sharron E.
    Kressin, Nancy R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH DENTISTRY, 2009, 69 (02) : 95 - 103
  • [38] Self-report measures of individual differences in regulatory focus: A cautionary note
    Summerville, Amy
    Roese, Neal J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 2008, 42 (01) : 247 - 254
  • [39] Systematic Review of Self-Report Measures of Maternal Self-Efficacy
    Jiramanee, Atchareya
    Driessnack, Martha
    Tilden, Ellen
    [J]. JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING, 2022, 51 (05): : 491 - 501