共 50 条
A narrative review shows the unvalidated use of self-report questionnaires for individual medication as outcome measures
被引:16
|作者:
Paterson, C
Britten, N
机构:
[1] Univ Bristol, Dept Social Med, Bristol BS8 2PR, Avon, England
[2] Peninsula Med Sch, Inst Clin Educ, Exeter, Devon, England
基金:
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词:
outcome;
medication;
medication diary;
questionnaire;
literature search;
literature review;
D O I:
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.03.012
中图分类号:
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Objective: Accurate individualized data on drug consumption is required for a number of purposes. While electronic medication event monitoring is the best objective measure available, self-report tools would be a useful alternative in certain situations. We searched for validated self-completion questionnaires suitable for measuring change in medication. Methods: A systematic search of the English language literature since 1980, and a narrative literature review. Results: Few articles described the development or use of self-report methods to measure change in medication over time. We found no questionnaire that was commonly used for this purpose, nor one that had been evaluated and published. Considerable work has been undertaken to develop questionnaires or diaries for individual projects, but because these tools and their validation are rarely published, they are not available for other researchers to use, and comparison across studies is difficult. Some work has been done developing diary formats and the Medication Quantification Scale converts complex medication change data to a single numerical score. Conclusion: Medication change is rarely considered as an outcome, and when it is measured, nonstandardized methods are used. More attention needs to be given to developing self-report tools and validating them across a range of criteria. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:967 / 973
页数:7
相关论文