The Use of a Novel, Nonsurgical Bone Conduction Hearing Aid System for the Treatment of Conductive Hearing Loss

被引:11
|
作者
Kuthubutheen, Jafri [1 ]
Broadbent, Chris [1 ,2 ]
Marino, Roberta [1 ,2 ]
Tavora-Vieira, Dayse [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Fiona Stanley Hosp, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Perth, WA, Australia
[2] Fiona Stanley Hosp, Dept Audiol, Perth, WA, Australia
[3] Univ Western Australia, Sch Med, Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Perth, WA, Australia
关键词
Adhesive device; Bone conduction hearing aid; Nonsurgical option; Novel device;
D O I
10.1097/MAO.0000000000002657
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Conventional bone conduction hearing aid solutions often require a cumbersome retention system such as a headband or cap. This study aims to determine if a novel, nonsurgical bone conduction aid utilizing an adhesive attachment over the mastoid is equivalent to the conventional bone conduction hearing aid (BCHA) for the management of conductive hearing loss. Study Design: Prospective, single-subject randomized, crossover trial. Setting: Tertiary referral center. Patients: Eleven adults and 1 child between 11 and 70 years of age with unilateral conductive hearing loss were enrolled. Intervention: Patients had their baseline hearing assessed and were randomized to receive either the novel device or BCHA headband system. Hearing loss etiologies were varied and included cholesteatoma, otosclerosis, chronic otitis media, and previous head and neck surgery. Patients had their baseline hearing assessed and trialled both the novel device or the BCHA headband system. Patients were randomly assigned one device which was worn for 2 weeks followed by a 2-week trial with the alternate device. Main Outcome Measure: Pure-tone thresholds and speech discrimination in quiet and noise were tested and patients also completed the short form of the Speech Spatial and Quality of Hearing (SSQ) questionnaire. Results: The mean unaided 4 frequency pure-tone average (PTA) air conduction threshold was 53.9 dB, bone conduction was 11.9 dB, and the mean air bone gap was 42 dB in the target ear. One patient with an adhesive skin reaction could not complete the protocol. Aided PTA and threshold testing between 250 Hz to 8000 Hz showed statistically equivalent results between both devices. The aided CNC word score, signal-to-noise ratio, and SSQ scores were also equivalent between both devices. Conclusion: The novel bone conduction aid demonstrates equivalent performance to the conventional BCHA headband solution. The novel device should be considered an alternative option where the cosmetic and comfort issues of a headband worn device are a concern.
引用
收藏
页码:948 / 955
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluating the effectiveness of bone conduction hearing implants in rehabilitation of hearing loss
    Jaydip Ray
    Essam Wanees
    Moustafa Mohamed Dawoud
    Heba Abu Elnaga
    Tarek A. Abdelhafez
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2023, 280 : 3987 - 3996
  • [42] Preoperative Headband Assessment for Semi-Implantable Bone Conduction Hearing Devices in Conductive Hearing Loss: Is it Useful or Misleading?
    Rainsbury, James W.
    Williams, Blair A.
    Gulliver, Mark
    Morris, David P.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2015, 36 (02) : e58 - e62
  • [43] Identification of induced and naturally occurring conductive hearing loss in mice using bone conduction
    Chhan, David
    McKinnon, Melissa L.
    Rosowski, John J.
    HEARING RESEARCH, 2017, 346 : 45 - 54
  • [44] Bilateral adhesive bone conduction devices in patients with congenital bilateral conductive hearing loss
    Liu, Yujie
    Wang, Yuan
    Yang, Lin
    Zhu, Jikai
    Wang, Danni
    Zhao, Shouqin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2023, 44 (04)
  • [45] Using a Bone Conduction Hearing Device as a Tactile Aid
    Kompis, Martin
    Langmair, Manfred
    Mantokoudis, Georgios
    Weder, Stefan
    Gawliczek, Tom
    Caversaccio, Marco Domenico
    AUDIOLOGY RESEARCH, 2023, 13 (03) : 459 - 465
  • [46] MODIFICATION OF THE TRADITIONAL BONE CONDUCTION HEARING-AID
    ROSS, DF
    VALLINO, LD
    GALLOWAY, C
    KELLER, P
    CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 1993, 30 (03): : 328 - 329
  • [47] Speech in Noise With Bilateral Active Bone Conduction Implant for Conductive and Mixed Hearing Loss
    Canale, Andrea
    Ndrev, Drita
    Sapino, Silvia
    Bianchi, Carlotta
    Bordino, Valerio
    Albera, Andrea
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2022, 43 (09) : 1000 - 1004
  • [48] The Effects of Utilizing Cartilage Conduction Hearing Aids among Patients with Conductive Hearing Loss
    Kakuki, Takuya
    Miyata, Ryo
    Yoshida, Yurie
    Kaizaki, Aya
    Kimura, Ayami
    Kurashima, Kaede
    Kuwata, Rui
    Takano, Kenichi
    AUDIOLOGY RESEARCH, 2023, 13 (03) : 408 - 417
  • [49] Nonsurgical management of hearing loss
    Mansour-Shousher, R
    Mansour, WN
    CLINICS IN GERIATRIC MEDICINE, 1999, 15 (01) : 163 - +
  • [50] THE HEARING PERFORMANCE INVENTORY AND HEARING-AID USE IN PROFOUND HEARING-LOSS
    OWENS, E
    FUJIKAWA, S
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1980, 23 (02): : 470 - 479