The Use of a Novel, Nonsurgical Bone Conduction Hearing Aid System for the Treatment of Conductive Hearing Loss

被引:11
|
作者
Kuthubutheen, Jafri [1 ]
Broadbent, Chris [1 ,2 ]
Marino, Roberta [1 ,2 ]
Tavora-Vieira, Dayse [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Fiona Stanley Hosp, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Perth, WA, Australia
[2] Fiona Stanley Hosp, Dept Audiol, Perth, WA, Australia
[3] Univ Western Australia, Sch Med, Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Perth, WA, Australia
关键词
Adhesive device; Bone conduction hearing aid; Nonsurgical option; Novel device;
D O I
10.1097/MAO.0000000000002657
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Conventional bone conduction hearing aid solutions often require a cumbersome retention system such as a headband or cap. This study aims to determine if a novel, nonsurgical bone conduction aid utilizing an adhesive attachment over the mastoid is equivalent to the conventional bone conduction hearing aid (BCHA) for the management of conductive hearing loss. Study Design: Prospective, single-subject randomized, crossover trial. Setting: Tertiary referral center. Patients: Eleven adults and 1 child between 11 and 70 years of age with unilateral conductive hearing loss were enrolled. Intervention: Patients had their baseline hearing assessed and were randomized to receive either the novel device or BCHA headband system. Hearing loss etiologies were varied and included cholesteatoma, otosclerosis, chronic otitis media, and previous head and neck surgery. Patients had their baseline hearing assessed and trialled both the novel device or the BCHA headband system. Patients were randomly assigned one device which was worn for 2 weeks followed by a 2-week trial with the alternate device. Main Outcome Measure: Pure-tone thresholds and speech discrimination in quiet and noise were tested and patients also completed the short form of the Speech Spatial and Quality of Hearing (SSQ) questionnaire. Results: The mean unaided 4 frequency pure-tone average (PTA) air conduction threshold was 53.9 dB, bone conduction was 11.9 dB, and the mean air bone gap was 42 dB in the target ear. One patient with an adhesive skin reaction could not complete the protocol. Aided PTA and threshold testing between 250 Hz to 8000 Hz showed statistically equivalent results between both devices. The aided CNC word score, signal-to-noise ratio, and SSQ scores were also equivalent between both devices. Conclusion: The novel bone conduction aid demonstrates equivalent performance to the conventional BCHA headband solution. The novel device should be considered an alternative option where the cosmetic and comfort issues of a headband worn device are a concern.
引用
收藏
页码:948 / 955
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] EARLY BONE CONDUCTION HEARING AID DEVICES
    BERGER, KW
    ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 1976, 102 (05) : 315 - 318
  • [22] Experimental Evaluation of the Adhear, a Novel Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Hearing Aid
    Dobrev, Ivo
    Farahmandi, Tahmine Sadat
    Huber, Alexander M.
    Roeoesli, Christof
    LARYNGO-RHINO-OTOLOGIE, 2021, 100 (10) : 811 - 817
  • [23] Audiometric and Surgical Outcomes of a Novel Bone-Conduction Hearing Aid
    Quimby, Alexandra E.
    Park, Jino
    Brant, Jason A.
    Eliades, Steven J.
    Kaufman, Hannah S.
    Bigelow, Douglas C.
    Ruckenstein, Michael J.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2022, 43 (09) : 995 - 999
  • [24] The effect of anatomical variables and use of the Lifts system on hearing outcomes after implantation of an active transcutaneous bone conduction device in bilateral congenital conductive hearing loss
    Yang, Jinsong
    Zhao, Chunli
    Liu, Yujie
    Gao, Mengdie
    Ren, Ran
    Wang, Danni
    Huang, Zhigang
    Zhao, Shouqin
    JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2020, 49 (01)
  • [25] The effect of anatomical variables and use of the Lifts system on hearing outcomes after implantation of an active transcutaneous bone conduction device in bilateral congenital conductive hearing loss
    Jinsong Yang
    Chunli Zhao
    Yujie Liu
    Mengdie Gao
    Ran Ren
    Danni Wang
    Zhigang Huang
    Shouqin Zhao
    Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, 49
  • [26] When is a conductive hearing loss not a conductive hearing loss? Causes of a mismatch in air-bone threshold measurements or a "pseudoconductive" hearing loss
    Bance, M
    JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2004, 33 (02): : 135 - 138
  • [27] Bonebridge® bone conduction implant. Hearing outcomes and quality of life in patients with conductive/mixed hearing loss
    Carnevale, Claudio
    Morales-Olavarria, C.
    Til-Perez, G.
    Sarria-Echegaray, P.
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2023, 280 (04) : 1611 - 1619
  • [28] Rehabilitation of patients with conductive hearing loss and moderate mental retardation by means of a bone-anchored hearing aid
    Kunst, Sylvia J. W.
    Hol, Myrthe K. S.
    Snik, Ad F. M.
    Mylanus, Emmanuel A. M.
    Cremers, Cor W. R. J.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2006, 27 (05) : 653 - 658
  • [29] Bonebridge® bone conduction implant. Hearing outcomes and quality of life in patients with conductive/mixed hearing loss
    Claudio Carnevale
    C. Morales-Olavarría
    G. Til-Pérez
    P. Sarría-Echegaray
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2023, 280 : 1611 - 1619
  • [30] A COMPARISON OF HEARING-AID BENEFIT IN CONDUCTIVE AND SENSORINEURAL HEARING-LOSS
    CARLIN, WV
    LAWSON, E
    GATEHOUSE, S
    BROWNING, GG
    CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 1985, 10 (02): : 114 - 114