The impact of treatment accuracy on proton therapy patient selection for oropharyngeal cancer patients

被引:24
|
作者
Arts, Tine [1 ]
Breedveld, Sebastiaan [1 ]
de Jong, Martin A. [2 ]
Astreinidou, Eleftheria [2 ]
Tans, Lisa [1 ]
Keskin-Cambay, Fatma [1 ]
Krol, Augustinus D. G. [2 ]
van de Water, Steven [1 ]
Bijman, Rik G. [1 ]
Hoogeman, Mischa S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, POB 5201, NL-3008 AE Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] LUMC, Dept Radiat Oncol, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
Proton therapy; Head and neck cancer; Oropharyngeal cancer; IMRT; IMPT; Robust optimization; INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY; COMPLICATION PROBABILITY; NECK-CANCER; SETUP UNCERTAINTIES; SALIVARY-GLANDS; HEAD; OPTIMIZATION; ROBUSTNESS; MODEL; MARGINS;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2017.09.028
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: The impact of treatment accuracy on NTCP-based patient selection for proton therapy is currently unknown. This study investigates this impact for oropharyngeal cancer patients. Materials and methods: Data of 78 patients was used to automatically generate treatment plans for a simultaneously integrated boost prescribing 70 Gy(RBE)/54.25 Gy(RBE) in 35 fractions. IMRT treatment plans were generated with three different margins; intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plans for five different setup and range robustness settings. Four NTCP models were evaluated. Patients were selected for proton therapy if NTCP reduction was >= 10% or >= 5% for grade II or III complications, respectively. Results: The degree of robustness had little impact on patient selection for tube feeding dependence, while the margin had. For other complications the impact of the robustness setting was noticeably higher. For high-precision IMRT (3 mm margin) and high-precision IMPT (3 mm setup/3% range error), most patients were selected for proton therapy based on problems swallowing solid food (51.3%) followed by tube feeding dependence (37.2%), decreased parotid flow (29.5%), and patient-rated xerostomia (7.7%). Conclusions: Treatment accuracy has a significant impact on the number of patients selected for proton therapy. Therefore, it cannot be ignored in estimating the number of patients for proton therapy. (c) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:520 / 525
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Proton therapy patient selection for oropharyngeal cancer patients: the impact of treatment accuracy
    Hoogeman, M.
    Breedveld, S.
    De Jong, M.
    Astreinidou, E.
    Tans, L.
    Keskin-Cambay, F.
    Bijman, R.
    Krol, S.
    Van de Water, S.
    Arts, T.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2017, 123 : S77 - S78
  • [2] Impact of model and dose uncertainty on model-based selection of oropharyngeal cancer patients for proton therapy
    Bijman, Rik G.
    Breedveld, Sebastiaan
    Arts, Tine
    Astreinidou, Eleftheria
    de Jong, Martin A.
    Granton, Patrick V.
    Petit, Steven F.
    Hoogeman, Mischa S.
    [J]. ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2017, 56 (11) : 1444 - 1450
  • [3] Patient selection for proton therapy using Normal Tissue Complication Probability with deep learning dose prediction for oropharyngeal cancer
    Huet-Dastarac, Margerie
    Michiels, Steven
    Rivas, Sara Teruel
    Ozan, Hamdiye
    Sterpin, Edmond
    Lee, John A. A.
    Barragan-Montero, Ana
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 50 (10) : 6201 - 6214
  • [4] Proton arc therapy increases the benefit of proton therapy for oropharyngeal cancer patients in the model based clinic
    Jong, Bas A.
    Korevaar, Erik W.
    Maring, Anneke
    Werkman, Chimene I.
    Scandurra, Daniel
    Janssens, Guillaume
    Both, Stefan
    Langendijk, Johannes A.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 184
  • [5] Xerostomia Impacts Dysgeusia in Oropharyngeal Cancer Patients Treated with Proton Therapy
    Deshpande, T. S.
    Gunn, G. B.
    Fuller, C. D.
    Ye, R.
    Rosenthal, D. I.
    Garden, A. S.
    Morrison, W. H.
    Phan, J.
    Reddy, J. P.
    Sturgis, E. M.
    Lu, C.
    Chambers, M. S.
    Hutcheson, K. A.
    Wang, L.
    Zhang, X.
    Zhu, X. R.
    Stieb, S.
    Foote, R. L.
    Frank, S. J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2019, 105 (01): : E414 - E415
  • [6] Spot scanning proton arc therapy reduces toxicity in oropharyngeal cancer patients
    de Jong, Bas A.
    Battinelli, Cecilia
    Free, Jeffrey
    Wagenaar, Dirk
    Engwall, Erik
    Janssens, Guillaume
    Langendijk, Johannes A.
    Korevaar, Erik W.
    Both, Stefan
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 50 (03) : 1305 - 1317
  • [7] Modeling the Potential Benefits of Proton Therapy for Patients With Oropharyngeal Head and Neck Cancer
    Lester-Coll, Nataniel H.
    Margalit, Danielle N.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2019, 104 (03): : 563 - 566
  • [8] Proton Therapy in Breast Cancer: A Review of Potential Approaches for Patient Selection
    Wu, Xiao-Yu
    Chen, Mei
    Cao, Lu
    Li, Min
    Chen, Jia-Yi
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2024, 23
  • [9] Preoperative accuracy of gastric cancer staging in patient selection for neoadjuvant therapy
    Ikoma, Naruhiko
    Elimova, Elena
    Blum, Mariela A.
    Ajani, Jaffer A.
    Chiang, Y. Sabrina
    Fournier, Keith F.
    Mansfield, Paul F.
    Badgwell, Brian D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (04)
  • [10] Reduced radiation-induced toxicity by using proton therapy for the treatment of oropharyngeal cancer
    Meijer, Tineke W. H.
    Scandurra, Dan
    Langendijk, Johannes A.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 93 (1107):