Proton arc therapy increases the benefit of proton therapy for oropharyngeal cancer patients in the model based clinic

被引:12
|
作者
Jong, Bas A. [1 ,3 ]
Korevaar, Erik W. [1 ]
Maring, Anneke [1 ]
Werkman, Chimene I. [1 ]
Scandurra, Daniel [1 ]
Janssens, Guillaume [2 ]
Both, Stefan [1 ]
Langendijk, Johannes A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Radiat Oncol, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Ion Beam Applicat SA, Louvain La Neuve, Belgium
[3] Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Radiat Oncol, POB 30001, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
Proton arc therapy; Model based clinic; Head and neck cancer; Static arc; Patient selection; Proton therapy; INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY; NECK-CANCER; HEAD; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109670
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: In the model-based approach, patients qualify for proton therapy when the reduction in risk of toxicity (ANTCP) obtained with IMPT relative to VMAT is larger than predefined thresholds as defined by the Dutch National Indication Protocol (NIPP). Proton arc therapy (PAT) is an emerging technology which has the potential to further decrease NTCPs compared to IMPT. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential impact of PAT on the number of oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) patients that qualify for proton therapy.Materials and methods: A prospective cohort of 223 OPC patients subjected to the model-based selection procedure was investigated. 33 (15%) patients were considered unsuitable for proton treatment before plan comparison. When IMPT was compared to VMAT for the remaining 190 patients, 148 (66%) patients qualified for protons and 42 (19%) patients did not. For these 42 patients treated with VMAT, robust PAT plans were generated.Results: PAT plans provided better or similar target coverage compared to IMPT plans. In the PAT plans, integral dose was significantly reduced by 18% relative to IMPT plans and by 54% relative to VMAT plans. PAT decreased the mean dose to numerous organs-at-risk (OARs), further reducing NTCPs. The ANTCP for PAT relative to VMAT passed the NIPP thresholds for 32 out of the 42 patients treated with VMAT, resulting in 180 patients (81%) of the complete cohort qualifying for protons.Conclusion: PAT outperforms IMPT and VMAT, leading to a further reduction of NTCP-values and higher ANTCP-values, significantly increasing the percentage of OPC patients selected for proton therapy.(c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. Radiotherapy and Oncology 184 (2023) 109670 This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Spot scanning proton arc therapy reduces toxicity in oropharyngeal cancer patients
    de Jong, Bas A.
    Battinelli, Cecilia
    Free, Jeffrey
    Wagenaar, Dirk
    Engwall, Erik
    Janssens, Guillaume
    Langendijk, Johannes A.
    Korevaar, Erik W.
    Both, Stefan
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 50 (03) : 1305 - 1317
  • [2] Impact of model and dose uncertainty on model-based selection of oropharyngeal cancer patients for proton therapy
    Bijman, Rik G.
    Breedveld, Sebastiaan
    Arts, Tine
    Astreinidou, Eleftheria
    de Jong, Martin A.
    Granton, Patrick V.
    Petit, Steven F.
    Hoogeman, Mischa S.
    [J]. ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2017, 56 (11) : 1444 - 1450
  • [3] Individualized quality of life benefit and cost-effectiveness estimates of proton therapy for patients with oropharyngeal cancer
    N. Patrik Brodin
    Rafi Kabarriti
    Clyde B. Schechter
    Mark Pankuch
    Vinai Gondi
    Shalom Kalnicki
    Madhur K. Garg
    Wolfgang A. Tomé
    [J]. Radiation Oncology, 16
  • [4] Individualized quality of life benefit and cost-effectiveness estimates of proton therapy for patients with oropharyngeal cancer
    Brodin, N. Patrik
    Kabarriti, Rafi
    Schechter, Clyde B.
    Pankuch, Mark
    Gondi, Vinai
    Kalnicki, Shalom
    Garg, Madhur K.
    Tome, Wolfgang A.
    [J]. RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2021, 16 (01)
  • [5] Proton Therapy in the Clinic
    DeLaney, Thomas F.
    [J]. IMRT IGRT SBRT- ADVANCES IN THE TREATMENT PLANNING AND DELIVERY OF RADIOTHERAPY, 2011, 43 : 465 - 485
  • [6] Xerostomia Impacts Dysgeusia in Oropharyngeal Cancer Patients Treated with Proton Therapy
    Deshpande, T. S.
    Gunn, G. B.
    Fuller, C. D.
    Ye, R.
    Rosenthal, D. I.
    Garden, A. S.
    Morrison, W. H.
    Phan, J.
    Reddy, J. P.
    Sturgis, E. M.
    Lu, C.
    Chambers, M. S.
    Hutcheson, K. A.
    Wang, L.
    Zhang, X.
    Zhu, X. R.
    Stieb, S.
    Foote, R. L.
    Frank, S. J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2019, 105 (01): : E414 - E415
  • [7] Proton Therapy Improves Toxicity for Oropharyngeal Cancer: An Outcomes and Predictive Model-based Approach
    Rwigema, J. C.
    Langendijk, J. A.
    van der Laan, H. P.
    Lukens, J. N.
    Swisher-McClure, S. D.
    Lin, A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2017, 99 (02): : S135 - S136
  • [8] Potential benefit of robust ITV-based proton therapy in cervical cancer patients
    Gort, E. M.
    Beukema, J. C.
    Spijkerman-Bergsma, M. J.
    De Vries-de Groot, M. L.
    Both, S.
    Langendijk, J. A.
    Matysiak, W. P.
    Brouwer, C. L.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 152 : S892 - S893
  • [9] The impact of treatment accuracy on proton therapy patient selection for oropharyngeal cancer patients
    Arts, Tine
    Breedveld, Sebastiaan
    de Jong, Martin A.
    Astreinidou, Eleftheria
    Tans, Lisa
    Keskin-Cambay, Fatma
    Krol, Augustinus D. G.
    van de Water, Steven
    Bijman, Rik G.
    Hoogeman, Mischa S.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2017, 125 (03) : 520 - 525
  • [10] Proton therapy patient selection for oropharyngeal cancer patients: the impact of treatment accuracy
    Hoogeman, M.
    Breedveld, S.
    De Jong, M.
    Astreinidou, E.
    Tans, L.
    Keskin-Cambay, F.
    Bijman, R.
    Krol, S.
    Van de Water, S.
    Arts, T.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2017, 123 : S77 - S78